2009/9/30 Richard Henderson :
> On 09/29/2009 07:32 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>>
>> My question is my definition of strict correct?
>> or should it be reload_in_progress || reload_completed?
>
> I'm tempted to say it should be the later, but I'm not sure it really makes
> any difference since reload
On 09/29/2009 04:23 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
The PowerPC 32-bit ELF ABI says that a struct is passed as a pointer
to an object or a copy of the object. Classes are treated the same
as classes. Does the C++ ABI have rules about classes like
std::complex that would cause them to be treated differ
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> And this was caused by Dave Korn's change on the 2009-09-22.
> He added -no-undefined to libgij_la_LDFLAGS which causes libtool to
> remove -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup from the link line.
Ow, sorry about that, I didn't know it would change things for Darwin. I'll
wh
And this was caused by Dave Korn's change on the 2009-09-22.
He added -no-undefined to libgij_la_LDFLAGS which causes libtool to
remove -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup from the link line.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Hi,
Sometime between revision 151933 and 152300, libjava is broken on
i386-darwin8.11.
libgij.so fails to build with the following error:
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/ld: Undefined symbols:
_libiconv
_libiconv_close
_libiconv_open
_environ
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Here wa
Thanks Bingfeng.
We are now facing the following problem:
We are trying to get the .dfa output file, showing details about the
automaton constructed. However we are unable to do so.
We tried
(a.)uncommenting - (automata_option "v") - in ia64.md file
(b.)adding v_flag = 1 in gen_automata_option(
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20090929 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20090929/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> We have ~48 hours left for stage 1 and I can't be confident of getting
> it reviewed in the remaining time, so I'd like to make a special
> request: can you, as RM, please say that this is OK in principle and
> that if I can get v3 approval (it already has
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> The trunk is in Stage 1. Stage 1 will end on Sep 30th.
Richard, I've got a patch for adding what I think (but may be wrong) counts
as a new feature - shared library libstdc++ as DLLs on windows platforms - and
it's been stuck in review limbo for tw
On 09/29/2009 01:49 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 13:37 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
haven't yet f
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 13:37 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
> > replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
> > haven't yet found it. Any suggestions?
>
> cp_
On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
haven't yet found it. Any suggestions?
cp_genericize?
Though I'm not sure what to do about global variables...
r~
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 18:39 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:27 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:29 +0200, Richard Guenther w
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 14:21 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/23/2009 02:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > The class types for std::decimal::decimal32 and friends do have the
> > proper modes. I suppose I could special-case aggregates of those modes
> > but the plan was to pass these particula
I'm very interested in your results. Also, which version would you be
trying to patch? Version 4.4.1, or the current development branch?
Thanks...
Todd
Speech recognition in use. It makes mistakes. I correct the ones I
notice...
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@tec
On 09/29/2009 07:32 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
My question is my definition of strict correct?
or should it be reload_in_progress || reload_completed?
I'm tempted to say it should be the later, but I'm not sure it really
makes any difference since reload does not query the operand predicates;
i
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 09/29/2009 06:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
the appended.
>>>
>>> What about just alway
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Can't we use graphite to re-roll loops? That is, compress the
> polyhedron by introducing a new parameter? But maybe I am
> not good at guessing what your initial bloat issue looks like.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that there is enough
tschere...@micron.com writes:
> I posted the following question about GCC and Solaris locale support to
> both gcc-help and libstdc++:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-09/msg00212.html
>
> It was recommended I try darwin, or ieee_1003.1-2001 for
> --enable-clocale when building GCC. None
Hi,
I have a zero-extension elimination patch that has been reviewed and needs
one minor fix before it is ready for submission. I can get this in by Thursday,
October 1st. Would it be alright to submit this patch then ?
Thanks,
-Sriraman.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Richard Guenther
Hi.
On Darwin we've got some difficulties with the guality testsuite
components.
first there are a couple of changes needed to get the basic
check_gualityXXX.exe to run
(a) we have to detect Darwin in the same category as unix for the
redirect.
(b) we need "-save-temps" to find the debug
On 09/29/2009 06:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
the appended.
What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
>> when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
>> the appended.
>
> What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
That will just cause everybody to always
So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
the appended.
What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
Paolo
My question is my definition of strict correct?
or should it be reload_in_progress || reload_completed?
This is not my area of expertise, but "reload_completed" is definitely
too weak.
I actually think strict should always be true when testing for
satisfaction of constraints.
Paolo
Профессиональное решение компьютерных проблем, установка Windows XP(SP3,SP2),
Vista (SP1,SP2), Office (2003/2007), И другой софт. Облуживание организаций,
заключение договоров, все документы. Выезд на место работы. /информация, цены,
контакты на w w w .i p t ele com .h 18 .r u (удалите пробелы м
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:47, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
> when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
> the appended.
Thanks. Testing.
Diego.
daniel tian writes:
> when I build the libgcc2.c, an unrecognizable RTL exist. Its about subreg.
> Here is the info:
>
> ../../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__mulvsi3':
> ../../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:169: error: unrecognizable
> insn:
> (insn 24 26 25
"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
>> - libiberty
>> I need help with this one. When the linker plugin is
>> enabled (if GCC is configured to use gold), LTO can
>> detect LTO objects inside archives via the callbacks it
>> gets from the li
Hello all,
I am doing a port for a 32bit target in GCC 4.4.0.
I have defined memory_constraints in predicates.c like this
(define_memory_constraint "Sr0"
"Memory refrence through base registers"
(match_test "target_mem_constraint (\"r0\", op)"))
In the function target_mem_constraint i have
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
I have successfully bootstrapped on
{i586,x86_64,ppc,ppc64,ia64,s390,s
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 22:00, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> You say "tested on x86_64". More detail is needed. Have you tested both
Sorry, I completely spaced out and forgot to mention this. Various
folks are testing the branch. I sent a request for testing the branch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> The summary is as follows, extra errors compared to a run
>> without the merge patch applied:
>>
>> i586:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error)
>> FAIL: gcc.
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The summary is as follows, extra errors compared to a run
> without the merge patch applied:
>
> i586:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:46:29PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > gets from the linker. Since the linker plugin is a shared
> > object, and it uses libiberty functions, it needs to use a
> > shared libiberty.
>
> Why can't they just link a static libiberty?
This comment from opcodes
Hello!
> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
>
> If anyone has free cycles I would appreciate results from other
> ELF-capable targets.
>
> $ svn co svn://gcc.gnu.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
>>> the branch on various platforms. Richi is cu
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
>> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
>> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
>
> I h
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
I have bootstrapped and tested i586, x86_64, ppc, ppc64, ia64,
s390 (o
39 matches
Mail list logo
