> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached a patch I built to add stdint-related
> information
> to GCC configuration for the mingw target (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg0.html
> for more details about why).
Thanks for this. I am just in the process of doning a testsuite run on e
Nicholas Yue wrote:
> Hi,
>
>On the page http://gcc.gnu.org, it mentions that as of 13 March 2009,
> the current release is the 4.4.0 series and there is now a 4.5.0
> development snapshot.
Actually, it's misleading. When that status message was sent, 4.4.0 series
was actually in the lowes
I was just reading this page: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
May I humbly draw your attention to this bullet point:
-Wparentheses now warns about expressions such as (!x | y) and (!x &
y). Using explicit parentheses, such as in ((!x) | y)), silences this
warning
Note the extra parenthesi
Hi,
On the page http://gcc.gnu.org, it mentions that as of 13 March
2009, the current release is the 4.4.0 series and there is now a 4.5.0
development snapshot.
Given that the information was three weeks old, I am not sure if the
failure of 4.4.0 appearing in the release (mirror) was a
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
And report your results along with the versions of target
triplet/compiler/gmp/mpfr that you used.
I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based on
GCC test results. Please help if you can.
- powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4.5.0 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3
Hi Rainer,
Here's a patch to add knowledge about C99 stdint.h types to the target
configuration for IRIX. I did that from the system headers of a
IRIX6.5 box, but can't bootstrap or regtest (I have very limited
access, can't run anything on it). If you can bootstrap and confirm
that tests
I thought this syntax, issued in $objdir
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="-all gcc.dg/dg.exp=c99-stdint-*"
would only run testcases that matched the pattern after the equals sign, but
right now on trunk for me it's running everything in gcc.dg/dg.exp:
=== gcc tests ===
Schedul
> "Frank" == Frank Ch Eigler writes:
>> [...] Since the FSF is the copyright owner, even if your reading
>> is held by someone to be correct, then the FSF's FAQ would count
>> as an additional permission. [...]
Frank> Is anyone else uncomfortable that an important license is to
Frank> r
Hi all,
Please find attached a patch I built to add stdint-related information
to GCC configuration for the mingw target (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg0.html
for more details about why). I built it from looking at the mingw
headers, because I have them on my laptop, I'm in a
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:33:59PM -0700, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> > [...] Earlier Bradley Kuhn had indicated that this would be covered
> > in the updated FAQ, but I don't really see it there. I sent him a
> > separate message asking him to update it.
>
> Joe Bu
This is a patch that should add stdint support on darwin. It should
work on both i386 and ppc, for Mac OS >= 10.3 (don't think we support
10.2 or earlier, anyway). Because I only have a laptop at hand and
poor connectivity for the next 10 days, the following needs doing:
-- bootstrap and r
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> [...] Earlier Bradley Kuhn had indicated that this would be covered
>> in the updated FAQ, but I don't really see it there. I sent him a
>> separate message asking him to update it.
>
> Joe Buck wrote:
>
>> [...] Since the
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Exactly the same happens on trunk.
GCC 4.5 _is_ trunk :-), so that explains this aspect, I believe.
Gerald
Nathan Froyd wrote:
> If you're going to seriously consider doing this, you may want to take:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01091.html
>
> as a starting point.
I certainly might, thank you !
cheers,
DaveK
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> [...] Earlier Bradley Kuhn had indicated that this would be covered
> in the updated FAQ, but I don't really see it there. I sent him a
> separate message asking him to update it.
Joe Buck wrote:
> [...] Since the FSF is the copyright owner, even if your reading is
>
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Also, windows doesn't have signal handlers. Except on Cygwin, which would
>> have to deal with this in its own way.
>
> Does Windows have any asynchronous signalling mechanism which can
> trigger an SEH-style exception? Or does SEH only trigger on a certain
> class
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:05:47PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > No fundamental difficulty that I know of. Lots of tedious work for
> > every backend setting RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P and adding
> > REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR notes to the manually constructed epilogue insns.
>
> I
Dave Korn writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> No fundamental difficulty that I know of. Lots of tedious work for
>> every backend setting RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P and adding
>> REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR notes to the manually constructed epilogue insns.
>>
>> And, in fact, I was wrong in saying that
FX wrote:
> Hum, well, only partially solved. I get a failure on c99-stdint-1.c,
> which I can reduce to:
> u.c:7: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> This is because, for 32-bit for example, intptr_t is "long" and
> INTPTR_MIN is (-2147483647-1), which is of type "int".
> The
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> No fundamental difficulty that I know of. Lots of tedious work for
> every backend setting RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P and adding
> REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR notes to the manually constructed epilogue insns.
>
> And, in fact, I was wrong in saying that exception could only occur
>
Piotr Wyderski wrote:
>> Snapshot gcc-4.5-20090402 is now available on
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20090402/
>> and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
>
> When building on Cygwin/WinXP configured as:
>
> $ ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.5-200904
Hum, well, only partially solved. I get a failure on c99-stdint-1.c,
which I can reduce to:
$ cat u.c
#include
void
test_ptr (void)
{
__typeof__(INTPTR_MIN) a;
__typeof__((intptr_t)0 + 0) *b = &a;
}
$ ./gcc/xgcc -B./gcc u.c -std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors -S
u.c: In function ‘test_ptr
2009/4/3 Ian Lance Taylor :
> "Vincent R." writes:
>
>> Once again what I describe above is simplified because when seh is used,
>> there is a mechanism
>> called virtual unwiding that I didn't explained but that is the reason to
>> store the prologue length.
>
> It's worth noting that in gcc the
> I.e. we need (primaries) x86-freebsd, x86-darwin, sparc-solaris2.10 and
> (secondaries) hppa-hpux11, ppc-aix5.2, ppc-darwin, x86-mingw32 and
> s390-linux-gnu.
I tested on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11, hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, ia64-hp-hpux11.23,
and ia64-debian-linux-gnu using GCC 4.2.1, MPFR 2.3.1, and GMP
> Snapshot gcc-4.5-20090402 is now available on
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20090402/
> and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
When building on Cygwin/WinXP configured as:
$ ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.5-20090402 -v --enable-bootstrap --enable
I have been criticized for inserting a mail from a public mail list
into this mail list. My position is that if a guy contradicts himself
in two different public mail lists, it is a reason to point to this.
Public mail list is a 'public' mail list. It is a source of reference,
for books for example
Dave Korn writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> First, an exception can occur while executing an instruction which
>> accesses memory or does a division (admittedly only within a __try
>> block). The raise exception call, on the other hand, can only occur
>> during a function call. gcc's -fasy
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Kirill Kononenko writes:
There have been mentioned a couple of ideas indeed. But I would not
like to spend a lot of my precious time on telling my thoughts and
suggestions, if the topic is already decided elsewhere. So I basically
want asking question which exactly J
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:54, Kirill Kononenko
wrote:
> What I want to identify is how both a VM engine(ILDJIT,
> .NET for example, Mono, Portable.NET), gcc and libJIT could be
> extended with minimal changes to both, for best user experience for
> example, is it speed performance, benchmark, cod
Hi Ian,
Thank you a lot for your reply.
>
>> There have been mentioned a couple of ideas indeed. But I would not
>> like to spend a lot of my precious time on telling my thoughts and
>> suggestions, if the topic is already decided elsewhere. So I basically
>> want asking question which exactly J
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> First, an exception can occur while executing an instruction which
> accesses memory or does a division (admittedly only within a __try
> block). The raise exception call, on the other hand, can only occur
> during a function call. gcc's -fasynchronous-unwind-tables opt
"Vincent R." writes:
> Once again what I describe above is simplified because when seh is used,
> there is a mechanism
> called virtual unwiding that I didn't explained but that is the reason to
> store the prologue length.
It's worth noting that in gcc the "prologue length" is normally an
unde
Kirill Kononenko writes:
> There have been mentioned a couple of ideas indeed. But I would not
> like to spend a lot of my precious time on telling my thoughts and
> suggestions, if the topic is already decided elsewhere. So I basically
> want asking question which exactly JITing support GCC need
I have been asked by many private emails to more precisely specify
what I mean in my proposal. The formula above in the topic,
illustrates shortly my idea. I already have a lot of work to do on
both coding, research, and documentation so please let me know as more
precisely as possible your thought
Hi Laurent,
The license wording will soon be changed and Ada gcc/ada/scn.adb
(function Determine_License) currently checks about licence.
Any change to the wording breaks Ada bootstrap as Jakub found out.
How should we proceed?
I have already changed the patch under development so that the te
Dave Korn writes:
> Really, it's all pretty much the same as DW2, except that rather than
> calling a raise exception function in libgcc, it begins with a real processor
> exception that then ends up routing into the unwinder. From there it's all
> fairly analagous.
It sounds like it is diffe
> The license wording will soon be changed and Ada gcc/ada/scn.adb
> (function Determine_License) currently checks about licence.
> Any change to the wording breaks Ada bootstrap as Jakub found out.
>
> How should we proceed?
scn.adb needs to be updated to recognize the new text I assume.
What wo
Hi
The license wording will soon be changed and Ada gcc/ada/scn.adb
(function Determine_License) currently checks about licence.
Any change to the wording breaks Ada bootstrap as Jakub found out.
How should we proceed? What will happen with existing
installed compilers?
Thanks in advance,
Laure
Dave Korn wrote:
> FX wrote:
>>> LOL, I forgot to attach mine didn't I? It's basically the same, I
>>> copied
>>> and pasted the newlib version and tweaked a couple of the definitions
>>> so they
>>> were identical to Cygwin's stdint.h. I suspect we're simply missing some
>>> needed definition s
There have been mentioned a couple of ideas indeed. But I would not
like to spend a lot of my precious time on telling my thoughts and
suggestions, if the topic is already decided elsewhere. So I basically
want asking question which exactly JITing support GCC needs, that I
don't spend my time in th
Kirill Kononenko wrote:
> Do I understand it correctly that there are no useful thoughts or
> ideas with-out- flaming and flooding about LLVM?
I will admit that I don't have any ideas, but I thought there were a couple
of positive suggestions in there.
It's possible there's a bit of "library
FX wrote:
>> LOL, I forgot to attach mine didn't I? It's basically the same, I
>> copied
>> and pasted the newlib version and tweaked a couple of the definitions
>> so they
>> were identical to Cygwin's stdint.h. I suspect we're simply missing some
>> needed definition somewhere, so I won't send
LOL, I forgot to attach mine didn't I? It's basically the same, I
copied
and pasted the newlib version and tweaked a couple of the
definitions so they
were identical to Cygwin's stdint.h. I suspect we're simply missing
some
needed definition somewhere, so I won't send mine now you've sent
Do I understand it correctly that there are no useful thoughts or
ideas with-out- flaming and flooding about LLVM?
Thanks,
Kirill
>
> 2009/4/1 Kirill Kononenko :
>> Please, let collect together all useful ideas and concrete thoughts? I
>> am sure many people already have thought about which JIT
Vincent R. wrote:
>> Really, it's all pretty much the same as DW2, except that rather than
>> calling a raise exception function in libgcc, it begins with a real
>> processor exception that then ends up routing into the unwinder. From
>> there it's all fairly analagous.
I should have added th
Hello Everyone
Do I understand it correctly that there are no useful thoughts or
ideas with flamimg and flooding about LLVM?
Thanks,
Kirill
2009/4/1 Kirill Kononenko :
> Please, let collect together all useful ideas and concrete thoughts? I
> am sure many people already have thought about whic
FX wrote:
>>> for some reason identifier_global_value() on it returns NULL.
>> ... and this is presumably because it should have /already/ been
> declared somehow.
>
> I have exactly the same issue on darwin, it segfaults on:
>
>> char16_type_node = TREE_TYPE (identifier_global_value
>> (char16
Life,
I had a chance to meet a lot of people. I interviewed First Lady Mrs.Obama, Paul Kaupas, Nancy Schultz Voots, Mayor Roger Claar (Bolingbrook), Mayor Joseph Broda (Lisle), Mayor Art Schultz (Joliet), Marilyn Miglin, Senator AJ Wilhelmi and more. I like to talk to Marilyn Miglin. She always
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> The trunk will be frozen for the merge of the alias-improvements branch
> tomorrow, Friday, April 3rd starting 8am UTC. I will do a last merge
> to the branch at that point, do a bootstrap & regtest cycle and
> finally commit the merge to trunk.
>
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:00:33 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> With SEH you can catch that kind of errors and that's why it's so
>>> interesting in embedded world
>>
>> That's also why SEH is a major pain for optimization. The compiler
>> would have to identify every instruction t
>> for some reason identifier_global_value() on it returns NULL.
> ... and this is presumably because it should have /already/ been
declared somehow.
I have exactly the same issue on darwin, it segfaults on:
char16_type_node = TREE_TYPE (identifier_global_value
(char16_type_node));
beca
Dave Korn wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> First attempt (attached) didn't go so well. When building libgcc2, I get
>> an ICE in the preprocessor, here:
>
>> As far as I can tell, CHAR16_TYPE is:
>>
>> (gdb) x/s 0x1fdb0f6 0x1fdb0f6 <__FUNCTION__.59453+167>: "unsigned
>> short" (gdb)
>>
>> Is
Hi,
> I.e. we need (primaries) x86-freebsd, x86-darwin, sparc-solaris2.10 and
> (secondaries) hppa-hpux11, ppc-aix5.2, ppc-darwin, x86-mingw32 and
> s390-linux-gnu.
I've tested with:
gmp-4.2.2-7 (fedora core 9)
mpfr-2.4.1 (vanilla)
gcc 4.3.2
mpc-0.6
The mpc testsuite is clean on s390-linux-
Cary Coutant wrote:
>> With SEH you can catch that kind of errors and that's why it's so
>> interesting in embedded world
>
> That's also why SEH is a major pain for optimization. The compiler
> would have to identify every instruction that may trigger an
> exception,
Isn't that what the "__tr
54 matches
Mail list logo
