Hum, well, only partially solved. I get a failure on c99-stdint-1.c,
which I can reduce to:
$ cat u.c
#include <stdint.h>
void
test_ptr (void)
{
__typeof__(INTPTR_MIN) a;
__typeof__((intptr_t)0 + 0) *b = &a;
}
$ ./gcc/xgcc -B./gcc u.c -std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors -S
u.c: In function ‘test_ptr’:
u.c:7: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type
This is because, for 32-bit for example, intptr_t is "long" and
INTPTR_MIN is (-2147483647-1), which is of type "int".
The same thing happens on 64-bit, because INTPTR_MIN is
(-9223372036854775807LL-1), which is of type "long long", while
intptr_t is still "long".
Is this a bug in darwin's headers?
FX
