Philipp Marek writes:
> I already asked that on gcc-help@ but got no answer, so I'm trying again here.
Sorry, this is the wrong mailing list, and so is gcc-help.
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is for discussion of development of gcc. You are asking
a question about the assembler. The assembler is part of the
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:44 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I'm happy to report that the gcc-in-cxx branch can now bootstrap. That
>> is, the code in gcc proper can now be compiled with a C++ compiler.
>
> Hi, did you test with Ada enabled? There are some C files in th
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" writes:
> I'm curious whether there are any detectable differences in the resulting
> compiler when built with g++ rather than gcc. E.g. testsuite regressions,
> changes in the speed or size of cc1, etc. Also, is cc1 linked with
> libstdc++.so ? Stuff like that.
>
> Would you
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> We try to have a sensible default setting that doesn't prevent constant
> folding (which -frounding-math does).
-ftrapping-math implemented according to its specification would prevent a
lot of constant folding (at least, the "inexact" and other exc
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
> > The defaults are deliberate decisions
> > (and as such the adoption of those decisions cannot meaningfully be
> > considered a regression: it's not a bug but a feature), but are more
> > li
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> The defaults are deliberate decisions
> (and as such the adoption of those decisions cannot meaningfully be
> considered a regression: it's not a bug but a feature), but are more
> likely to change in the other direction from what you want
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Sylvain Pion wrote:
> this pragma. I nevertheless try to find grants for funding
> people to implement some related things in GCC. And I also
> contribute time to help in the guidance of GCC with my
> expertise in this particular area, even if it requires a lot
> of time to c
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Sylvain Pion
wrote:
Joseph S. Myers a écrit :
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Sylvain Pion wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00104.html
introduced the -frounding-math option, and changed
the default behavior of GCC to optimize "unsaf
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Sylvain Pion
wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers a écrit :
>>
>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Sylvain Pion wrote:
>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00104.html
>>> introduced the -frounding-math option, and changed
>>> the default behavior of GCC to optimize "unsafely
Joseph S. Myers a écrit :
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Sylvain Pion wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00104.html
introduced the -frounding-math option, and changed
the default behavior of GCC to optimize "unsafely".
That is a misleading description. The cautionary text added by that
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trunk on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi (compile farm gcc50) currently fails
> about 1000 C tests:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg00810.html
>
> 99% of those fail are neon FAIL:
>
> ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_
Hi,
Trunk on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi (compile farm gcc50) currently fails
about 1000 C tests:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg00810.html
99% of those fail are neon FAIL:
...
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu32.c scan-assembler vst4.32[ \\t]+\\
\\{(([dD][0-9]+[[0-9]+]-
Toon Moene wrote:
> There is considerable anxiety about the "we're waiting for the FSF ...
> run-time library license" - at the very least in the Fortran community,
>
> Certainly, waiting on a license decision doesn't force us to wait to
> branch (yes, I know it's twice as much work after branchi
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Sylvain Pion wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00104.html
> introduced the -frounding-math option, and changed
> the default behavior of GCC to optimize "unsafely".
That is a misleading description. The cautionary text added by that patch
is still present
Mark Mitchell wrote:
The trunk remains Stage 4, so only fixes for regressions (and changes
to documentation) are allowed.
As stated previously, the GCC 4.4 branch will be created when there
are no open P1s and the total number of P1, P2, and P3 regressions is
under 100. We've achieved that, bu
I would like to argue that the default behavior should
be -frounding-math, which is safer than the opposite
used currently.
Back in 2003, the following patch by Roger Sayle :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00104.html
introduced the -frounding-math option, and changed
the default beh
gcc -S tmp.S for some reason prints to stdout, so gcc -S tmp.S > tmp.s
is what you need
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Carl wrote:
> you could run cpp on it by itself, or I suspect gcc -S tmp.s will also
> work, im in a rush though cant test this.
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Philipp Mare
you could run cpp on it by itself, or I suspect gcc -S tmp.s will also
work, im in a rush though cant test this.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Philipp Marek wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I already asked that on gcc-help@ but got no answer, so I'm trying again here.
>
>
> I'm looking for a way t
I sent this message to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org yesterday, but have not
gotten any mail on any thread from them? Are they active? Is there a
problem with the mail server? Anyway
I wrote a program, and when I compile it, I get:
mich...@camille OurRPG $ make
g++ -O2 -W -Wall -pedantic `sdl-config --
Hi,
thanks for support ;)
I have to look into the other things mentioned in the thread and decide
how to proceed with this idea.
> > we are however lost when we have pointer to those struct since there
> > is no means describing "there is no memory location for this pointer,
> > but it would be poi
Hello everybody,
I already asked that on gcc-help@ but got no answer, so I'm trying again here.
I'm looking for a way to get inbetween the assembler macro processor and the
assembler.
I'd like to get the assembler sources mostly as-is, but with the macros used
therein already expanded.
I've a
21 matches
Mail list logo
