On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Laurent GUERBY <laur...@guerby.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Trunk on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi (compile farm gcc50) currently fails > about 1000 C tests: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg00810.html > > 99% of those fail are neon FAIL: > > ... > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu32.c scan-assembler vst4.32[ \\t]+\\ > \\{(([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]-[dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\])|([dD][0-9]+\ > \\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], > [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]))\\\\}, \\\\[[rR][0-9]+\\\\]!?([ \ > \...@[a-za-z0-9 ]+)?\\n > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu8.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu8.c scan-assembler vst4.8[ > \\t]+\\\\{(([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]-[dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\])|([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], > [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], > [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]))\\\\}, \\\\[[rR][0-9]+\\\\]!?([ \\...@[a-za-z0-9 > ]+)?\\n > > A while ago I opened (but there were far less neon FAIL): > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38697 > > There is also: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39361 > > arm-eabi is listed as primary platform here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html > > Do you know why all these tests are failing?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00442.html Richard. > Thanks in advance, > > Laurent > >
