Re: gcc-4.2-20060304 is now available

On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 10:53 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Andrew Pinski wrote: > > >>> gcc-core-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 15703096 > >>> gcc-g++-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 3905138 > >>> gcc-objc-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 191280 > >>> gcc-fortran-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 793478 >

Re: NOPs inserting problem in GCC 4.1.x

Sorry. The example of previous post was wrong. I just corrected it in this post. I'm porting GCC 4.1.1 to a VLIW processor. The processor couldn't solve any hazards itself so we should insert explicit NOPs after insn scheduling. I have implemented this functionality in the hook `TARGET_MACHINE

NOPs inserting problem in GCC 4.1.x

I'm porting GCC 4.1.1 to a VLIW processor. The processor couldn't solve any hazards itself so we should insert explicit NOPs after insn scheduling. I have implemented this functionality in the hook `TARGET_MACHINE_DEPENDENT_REORG' (pass 52: mach). Then I noticed that the pass 56 (split3) will el

Multiple errors with GCOV

Good ! I'm writing code coverage analysis tool for C++ which uses GCOV as a source of coverage information. My program is written in C++ and it heavily uses Boost libraries. As a result of trying to run compile my program and Boost with GCOV support I've found that GCOV does not work well wi

Re: Patch for i386-darwin: test suite results

On 17/mar/2006, at 00:57, Andrew Pinski wrote: Actually it looks like libffi is still not working as you no longer have eh info for x86-darwin. This is why all the gij tests fail. I have implemented EH for Darwin/x86 and now much more tests pass: Test Run By sandro on Sun Mar 19 10:12:14 20