Good <time-of-day>!
I'm writing code coverage analysis tool for C++ which uses GCOV as a
source of coverage information. My program is written in C++ and it
heavily uses Boost libraries.
As a result of trying to run compile my program and Boost with GCOV
support I've found that GCOV does not work well with complex C++ programs.
For example, GCC produces ICE when Boost.Program_Options is compiled as
a dynamic library, Boost.Serialization compiles only if I make some
modifications to xml_grammar.cpp file, etc.
I've tracked down a couple of bugs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25351 and another one which
I can't remember :)
I don't see any progress on GCOV, so I assume it's up to me to fix these
bugs. I'm writing here to cooperate with GCOV developers to avoid
duplicate work.
--
With respect,
Alex Besogonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
