On Jul 26, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
I think the RA may be missing the concept that memory might be faster
than any possible register
will dig further.
Yes, it is. The following fixes my problem, and causes a couple of
3DNow-specific regressions
in the testsuite which I
Mark Cuss wrote:
> I'm pretty certain that I'm not the only person who struggles with the "Oh,
> that app was built on RH 8 so it won't run on RH 7.3" problems, so I'm
> trying to find a solution where I can configure my build system in such a
> way that I can distribute a set of libraries with
Mark Cuss wrote:
>
> I'm pretty certain that I'm not the only person who struggles with the "Oh,
> that app was built on RH 8 so it won't run on RH 7.3" problems, so I'm
> trying to find a solution where I can configure my build system in such a
> way that I can distribute a set of libraries wi
Simon Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where can I download gcc binary code for Linux? What's
> URL?
This is actually the wrong mailing list for this question. Can you
tell us why you wrote to this list, so that we can encourage people to
write to the correct list instead? Thanks. The right
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:15:20PM -0700, Simon Tsai wrote:
> Where can I download gcc binary code for Linux? What's
> URL?
You're best off using the gcc package that is designed to work with
your distribution. Please ask a list that is devoted to your GNU/Linux
distribution to find out how to do
Hi,
Where can I download gcc binary code for Linux? What's
URL?
Thanks.
simon
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 20:08 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> tree level is fine too, it was just that the RTL level already had a
> host of counters being inserted. One implementation question if I may
> ask, so at the tree level how do I create a call to my function.
build_function_call_expr.
Lo
tree level is fine too, it was just that the RTL level already had a
host of counters being inserted. One implementation question if I may
ask, so at the tree level how do I create a call to my function. I
know how to insert it into the tree but some how all my creations
attempts with build_functi
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:42 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> What doesnt exist very long - the references ?
By RTL, they've been expanded to pointer accesses.
> At RTL level, I just want to insert a counter for each one of
> these.
Why do it at the rtl level.
Why not do it at the tree lev
Snapshot gcc-3.4-20050726 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/3.4-20050726/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 3.4 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-3_4-20050726
You'll
What doesnt exist very long - the references ?
At RTL level, I just want to insert a counter for each one of
these. One alternative I saw is inserting a dummy functiion call.
Would that work ? If so, for a given name, how do I create a
corresponding function expression for it ?
thanks f
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:39 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
> I am not sure if I unerstand ...can you elaborate please ? So what I
> need is if I identify say a reference a[i] inside a loop, I want to
> identify the corresponding RTL.
What are you trying to do at the RTL level with array reference
I am not sure if I unerstand ...can you elaborate please ? So what I
need is if I identify say a reference a[i] inside a loop, I want to
identify the corresponding RTL. What I find now is that
these get transformed for example
D.1065_17 = a_matrix[i_24][k_30]; // I have identified
On Jul 26, 2005, at 12:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Dale Johannesen wrote:
With -march=pentium4 -mfpmath=sse -O2, we get an extra move for code
like
double d = atof(foo);
int i = d;
callatof
fstpl -8(%ebp)
movsd -8(%ebp), %xmm0
cvttsd2si %xmm
On 07/26/05 05:52 PM, Robert Dewar sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > I also found, to my delight and surprise, that the same code appears
> > to perform between 10% and 20% better - in a rough, fairly imprecise
> > environment.
>
> why surprise?
I wasn't aware it was poss
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
I also found, to my delight and surprise, that the same code appears
to perform between 10% and 20% better - in a rough, fairly imprecise
environment.
why surprise?
On 07/26/05 12:28 AM, Giovanni Bajo sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I added the -fstack-check switch to my makefile and recompiled with
> > various optimizations. I was pretty surprised at the file sizes that
> > showed up:
> >
> > No Optimization:
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:21:51PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
>I am trying to find out how to insert annotations for certain array
> references identified in tree-loop-linear.c so that when converting to
>
In the ARRAY_REFs themselves? I would build a hash table on the
side. If it's on th
Hi,
I am trying to find out how to insert annotations for certain array
references identified in tree-loop-linear.c so that when converting to
RTL they can be handled differently. I find that simply inserting a
flag in the tree node is not enough as optimizations later on can lead
to the node b
Oh! I didn't know you could do that! Thanks very much!
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Haren Visavadia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Cuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for
ld-li
--- Mark Cuss wrote:
>
> For #1, if I build with --static, then no libraries
> can be linked in
> dynamically at runtime... I need to do this for
> some custom Qt libraries
> and plugins, so I can't just make a completely
> static executable. This is
> unfortunate - the resulting binaries wou
I appreciate your help, but I don't really appreciate the way you insinuate
that I didn't do some leg work before running off to the mailing list. I
*DID* RTFM, thank you very much. I found the -rpath option, tried it, and
it didn't work. I mentioned this in my original post - I was confused
Ok - thanks.
For #1, if I build with --static, then no libraries can be linked in
dynamically at runtime... I need to do this for some custom Qt libraries
and plugins, so I can't just make a completely static executable. This is
unfortunate - the resulting binaries would be big, but they'd w
I was wondering if any addition work had been completed toward pragma
support for the autovectorization branch (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01560.html)?
Thanks..
Chad Rosier
Jan,
That's going to be rather difficult given that the app
has over 1000 files. Is there a way I can turn off the
"default" options one at a time ?
Thx
-girish
--- Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have done quite a few experiments with this to
> > narrow down the problem. The perform
>
> All,
>
> Is there a way to exclude a given directory, for example,
> libjava, from multilibing? There are certainly cases where
> it may make sense to have the C/C++ runtime be multilibbed
> one way, but not have libjava multilibed the same way.
> I looked for something like this in the docs
All,
Is there a way to exclude a given directory, for example,
libjava, from multilibing? There are certainly cases where
it may make sense to have the C/C++ runtime be multilibbed
one way, but not have libjava multilibed the same way.
I looked for something like this in the docs and didn't
find
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:16:48AM -0400, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
> Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>
> > I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> > external static or dynamic library.
>
> > In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> > implement
Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
> I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> external static or dynamic library.
> In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> implementation (in my example, for "write"). But if the linker or
> dynamic linker resolves
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:19:43AM -0400, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>
> I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> external static or dynamic library.
>
> In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> implementation (in my example, for "write").
I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
external static or dynamic library.
In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
implementation (in my example, for "write"). But if the linker or
dynamic linker resolves it, the symbol definition from an
Hi,
nios2 has a set of custom registers for custom instructions. They all
start with "c", like
custom 1 c4, c2, c0
I want to define a peephole to replace a sequence of codes with this
above custom instruction.
custom instruction is defined as following in nios2.md
(define_insn "custom_inii"
Dale Johannesen wrote:
With -march=pentium4 -mfpmath=sse -O2, we get an extra move for code like
double d = atof(foo);
int i = d;
callatof
fstpl -8(%ebp)
movsd -8(%ebp), %xmm0
cvttsd2si %xmm0, %eax
(This is Linux, Darwin is similar.) I thi
Paolo, could you go back and think about the bootstrapping problem
from MinGW's perspective?
I had considered cygwin, that had some problems because of the
executable-file extension. I had also thought of using batch files via
config.build, but got stuck because Windows. does not have as f
Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > The full list of bugs is produced below. Maintainers, please look
| > into any of those and see which ones you can fix or give guidance for
| > fixes in ways that are suitable for a stable branch.
|
| This m68k patch
> I have done quite a few experiments with this to
> narrow down the problem. The performance numbers are
> slower compared to *No Feedback optimization with just
> -O3* Here are some of them. All the experiments were
> done on a new build-area in order to eliminate effects
> of old feedback files
36 matches
Mail list logo
