Louis LeBlanc wrote:
I also found, to my delight and surprise, that the same code appears to perform between 10% and 20% better - in a rough, fairly imprecise environment.
why surprise?
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
I also found, to my delight and surprise, that the same code appears to perform between 10% and 20% better - in a rough, fairly imprecise environment.
why surprise?