Updates:
Status: NeedsInfo
Labels: -Version Version-TRUNK
Comment #2 on issue 257 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Database password
retrieval error and abort in IDE
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=257
There is a problem with Gnome keyring. Do you run Gnome3 ?
--
Updates:
Status: NeedsInfo
Labels: -Version Version-TRUNK
Comment #1 on issue 258 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Expander and slider combo
issues
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=258
Can you provide me a screenshot of your problem?
--
Does it work in revision #4847?
/Emil
2012/6/18 Jussi Lahtinen
> Starting program: /usr/local/bin/gbx3
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
> gbx3: ExecutionEngine.cpp:165: void
> llvm::ExecutionEngine::addG
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/gbx3
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
gbx3: ExecutionEngine.cpp:165: void
llvm::ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(const llvm::GlobalValue*, void*):
Assertion `(CurVal == 0 || Add
Hi. Can you please provide more information? A gdb backtrace or something,
because I get no errors at all. Everything seems to work for me ...
/Emil
2012/6/18 Jussi Lahtinen
> OK, I found it. See attachment.
>
> Jussi
>
>
>
>
> On 17 June 2012 23:36, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
>
> > OK, that is fix
OK, I found it. See attachment.
Jussi
On 17 June 2012 23:36, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> OK, that is fixed, and I cannot see any problems with compare method
> anymore.
>
> But with my big project, I got this with signal 6;
> gbx3: ExecutionEngine.cpp:165: void
> llvm::ExecutionEngine::addGlobal
> Some systems do not use sudo. Maybe they find it unsecure.
>
Hmmm... I don't know any reason for sudo being insecure compared to su.
Do you mean sudo exist, but it's use is restricted like su in Ubuntu..?
Otherwise, if sudo doesn't exist then use "su -c", if this also fails,
then I don't know
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 19:22 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Some systems do not use sudo. Maybe they find it unsecure.
Dancing with Android Linux with root MIA and directory permission
structures like a maze, is a challenge to say the least. Besides all
that, I was able to get ScriptBasic running
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 18/06/2012 19:15, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
> >> Maybe it would be possible to write a graphical su entirely in Gambas?
> >> The first difficulty I see is how to know if we must use 'su' or 'sudo'
> >> to run the command...
> >>
> >>
> > I have never
Le 18/06/2012 19:15, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
>> Maybe it would be possible to write a graphical su entirely in Gambas?
>> The first difficulty I see is how to know if we must use 'su' or 'sudo'
>> to run the command...
>>
>>
> I have never run into need for su, I always use sudo.
> Example in Ubun
> Maybe it would be possible to write a graphical su entirely in Gambas?
> The first difficulty I see is how to know if we must use 'su' or 'sudo'
> to run the command...
>
>
I have never run into need for su, I always use sudo.
Example in Ubuntu as default, you cannot do "su root".
So su is useful
> As far as know, at least CentOS doesn't have a graphical authorisation
> utility for sudo.
>
Seems so, weird.
As far as I know, on some mandriva related distros with gnome desktops
> installed, it still bumps the user privileges even if -c is used.
>
Also strange...
Hmm. I have seen gks
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 16:24 +0300, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> > No, xdg-su is no longer part of xdg-utils.
> >
>
> Do you know reason for this?
No, I just look at the latest releases.
>
>
>
> > I have not used the xdg-su script for privilege escalation, but a quick
> > (and I mean quick!) look th
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Version Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any
Desktop-Any GUI-Any
New issue 258 by r...@cyberjunky.nl: Expander and slider combo issues
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=258
1) Describe the problem.
I know that not long ago the widt
Comment #1 on issue 257 by r...@cyberjunky.nl: Database password retrieval
error and abort in IDE
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=257
Additional info: you get the abort if you right click the connection and
choose properties.
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 22:39 +0930, Bruce wrote:
> Try this:
> Create a new command line project in the IDE.
> Add a new class "Application" with the following contents
>
> ' Gambas class file
>
> Create Static
> Inherits Application
> Export
>
>
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Version Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any
Desktop-Any GUI-Any
New issue 257 by r...@cyberjunky.nl: Database password retrieval error and
abort in IDE
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=257
1) Describe the problem.
I'm trying ou
You don't need to call alloca(). Simply use something like this:
CLASS *her[get_the_size()];
It is valid in C99.
2012/6/18 Benoît Minisini
> Le 18/06/2012 14:32, Emil Lenngren a écrit :
> > Even if most projects don't need more than depth 16, there might be
> some
> > very large projects (lik
The previous topic has reminded me of something.
Contrary to what is said or implied in section 3.2 of the "Object Model"
help topic, it is not possible to override several if not many native
classes.
Two particular instances leap to mind, "Application" and "Error".
Try this:
Create a new comman
Haha lol.
I looked up the class hierarchy for LLVM, which is a quite large project,
and the longest chain had 9 classes.
/Emil
2012/6/18 Bruce
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 14:32 +0200, Emil Lenngren wrote:
> > Even if most projects don't need more than depth 16, there might be some
> > very large pr
Le 18/06/2012 14:32, Emil Lenngren a écrit :
> Even if most projects don't need more than depth 16, there might be some
> very large projects (like Bruce's) that need it. Even well-designed
> projects can have a large class tree.
>
> And it is relatively easy to make that algorithm max depth-inde
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 14:32 +0200, Emil Lenngren wrote:
> Even if most projects don't need more than depth 16, there might be some
> very large projects (like Bruce's) that need it. Even well-designed
> projects can have a large class tree.
>
> And it is relatively easy to make that algorithm max
Even if most projects don't need more than depth 16, there might be some
very large projects (like Bruce's) that need it. Even well-designed
projects can have a large class tree.
And it is relatively easy to make that algorithm max depth-independent.
First see at what depth the current class is a
Le 18/06/2012 13:24, Emil Lenngren a écrit :
> What is the real reason for limiting inheritance to max 16 levels? I see no
> problem having no limit at all.
>
> /Emil
>
16 is arbitrary, but a limit is necessary for one algorithm in class
inheritance management.
Anyway if you need more than 16 in
What is the real reason for limiting inheritance to max 16 levels? I see no
problem having no limit at all.
/Emil
2012/6/18 Bruce
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 18:06 +0200, Emil Lenngren wrote:
> > Instead of overriding, why not simply create a module that does things
> with
> > your array instead?
>
Le 18/06/2012 12:41, Bruce a écrit :
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 12:19 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Le 17/06/2012 12:59, Bruce a écrit :
>>> No bugs or questions this time. Just some observations.
>>>
>>> 1) Using a library that contains an exposed form.
>>>
>>> If a library exposes a form then wh
Le 17/06/2012 12:59, Bruce a écrit :
> No bugs or questions this time. Just some observations.
>
> 1) Using a library that contains an exposed form.
>
> If a library exposes a form then when using that library in the IDE in
> another project, I see a "magical" method called $Load is exposed. I'm
27 matches
Mail list logo
