Hi,
My package updating is really bad. Not really enough time. I had much problems
with everything. Which are hopfully now fixed.
I am going to make time today for this.
Maarten
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: "Jerome E. Shidel Jr."
Verzonden: 12-1-2016 22:07
Aan: "Technical discussi
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2016 1:37 PM, "Tom Ehlert" wrote:
>>
>> just wondering what the 'official' most recent version of COMMAND.COM
>> is.
AFAIK, the latest stable is old 0.84-pre2 XMS_Swap from 2006 or so.
There is no active maintainer.
The Software List sa
On Jan 12, 2016 1:37 PM, "Tom Ehlert" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just wondering what the 'official' most recent version of COMMAND.COM
> is.
>
> is it http://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/freecom/trunk/ ?
>
> I remember that Bart ported command.com 'mostly' to WATCOM; is the
> port now finished,
Hello again all you FDEV’s,
I was feeling a little bored, so by adding 6 lines to FDI, I enabled “install
from directory” support. Kinda, sorta.
Basically, you do an xcopy /e a:\*.* . into a subdirectory for both the FDI
boot image and Mateusz’s ALL_CD.iso.
And it works… Mostly, that is.
Well
Hi,
just wondering what the 'official' most recent version of COMMAND.COM
is.
is it http://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/freecom/trunk/ ?
I remember that Bart ported command.com 'mostly' to WATCOM; is the
port now finished, and working great?
just wondering because
http://www.ibiblio
Hi,
There are a lot of libraries that are used to BUILD FreeDOS from source. If
those libraries were all together, it would make the build process easier.
I also think that it would encourage some code re-use because the library
to do (x) function is readily available to be included instead of sea