Re: [Freedos-devel] Silly me

2016-01-12 Thread Maarten Vermeulen
Hi, My package updating is really bad. Not really enough time. I had much problems with everything. Which are hopfully now fixed. I am going to make time today for this. Maarten -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: "Jerome E. Shidel Jr." Verzonden: ‎12-‎1-‎2016 22:07 Aan: "Technical discussi

Re: [Freedos-devel] Command.com DIR

2016-01-12 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:04 PM, wrote: > On Jan 12, 2016 1:37 PM, "Tom Ehlert" wrote: >> >> just wondering what the 'official' most recent version of COMMAND.COM >> is. AFAIK, the latest stable is old 0.84-pre2 XMS_Swap from 2006 or so. There is no active maintainer. The Software List sa

Re: [Freedos-devel] Command.com DIR

2016-01-12 Thread perditionc
On Jan 12, 2016 1:37 PM, "Tom Ehlert" wrote: > > Hi, > > just wondering what the 'official' most recent version of COMMAND.COM > is. > > is it http://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/freecom/trunk/ ? > > I remember that Bart ported command.com 'mostly' to WATCOM; is the > port now finished,

[Freedos-devel] Silly me

2016-01-12 Thread Jerome E. Shidel Jr.
Hello again all you FDEV’s, I was feeling a little bored, so by adding 6 lines to FDI, I enabled “install from directory” support. Kinda, sorta. Basically, you do an xcopy /e a:\*.* . into a subdirectory for both the FDI boot image and Mateusz’s ALL_CD.iso. And it works… Mostly, that is. Well

[Freedos-devel] Command.com DIR

2016-01-12 Thread Tom Ehlert
Hi, just wondering what the 'official' most recent version of COMMAND.COM is. is it http://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/freecom/trunk/ ? I remember that Bart ported command.com 'mostly' to WATCOM; is the port now finished, and working great? just wondering because http://www.ibiblio

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Build Tools

2016-01-12 Thread Antony Gordon
Hi, There are a lot of libraries that are used to BUILD FreeDOS from source. If those libraries were all together, it would make the build process easier. I also think that it would encourage some code re-use because the library to do (x) function is readily available to be included instead of sea