Hi!
7--2006 13:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[email protected]:
>>MD> to "EMM386 may never get build subsystem".
>> Yes, I fear, it may never get _working_ build subsystem.
MD> You mean working for Arkady?
For me too.
MD> Ok, if you're sure that you
Hi!
7-Авг-2006 03:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[email protected]:
EA> Current FreeCOM does not support "; ..." comments, only "rem ...",
EA> why that? Is that a bug?
Why it should?
>echo ; this is comment>test.bat
>test
>; this is comment
Bad command or file
At 11:07 PM 8/5/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>MD> I still can't read your list mails very well,
>
> In this letter, there shouldn't be 8-bit characters, so recoding
>through base64 shouldn't happen. Is it readable to you?
Yes.
>MD> to "EMM386 may never get build subsystem".
>
>
At 12:12 PM 8/7/2006 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
> But I'm not sure why you're using 2.11, anyway. It's at least a couple of
> > iterations back...
>
>Argh. I said 2.11 while I meant 2.21 of course... You also have
>to replace 2.10 by 2.20 in my previous mail to get things right.
Well, since 386SWAT
Hi Michael,
>> There are new EMM386 2.11 troubles: Jazz Jackrabbit
>> crashes (returns to DOS) with either a page fault or
>> a GPF as soon as you use the NOEMS option of EMM386
>> now. Lemmings 3d needs a page frame anyway, so it
>> "cannot find EMS" if you use the NOEMS option...
>> The Stargun
> Is it meant that there is a new disk image there?
No, I only worked on config and autoexec on the virtual
boot disk and on config and autoexec which are installed.
>> A small editor (TED3 for example) and LBACACHE should be added
>> to the virtual boot disk. Maybe also MEM and PG and MORESYS.
