On Wednesday 29 October 2003 00:42, you wrote:
> I just checked the FreeBSD site and do not see any release 5.2
It is not release yet :)
> Once i can hurl this obsticle, i think FreeBSD might be a viable
> solution for me.
Well, let be it then... I'm running -CURRENT with dynamic root and it wor
David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails
with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected
soon?
Is this an ISA or PCI card?
it is an easy i/o 8 PCI card. i hav
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:58:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the
> available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at
> sector 63 and ending on cylinder boundary). This is completely useless
> on servers and
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:11:53AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
> >
> >>i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails
> >>with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected
> >>soon?
> >
> >
It seems David Gilbert wrote:
> I have tried several times in recent days to burn DVDs with burncd,
> growisofs and cdrecord ... all of which worked before atang.
> Growisofs complains that it can't flush it's buffers. Burncd doesn't
> complain ... but the resulting disk is not mountable.
>
> I t
Donald Creel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) :
> This has been reproducible for the last few weeks. System will crash if
> I am strictly from ttyv(n) or using KDE3.x and drag and drop.
I have no crashes but i see locks of gbde file systems (no more
activity, system idle 100%, file systems un
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
TL>Harti Brandt wrote:
TL>> When applying "%*d%d" to the string "123" the first 'd' format matches
TL>> the string "123" and the conversion yields the number 123. This is then
TL>> thrown away because assignment is suppressed. The next format specified
TL>
Hi,
are anyone familiar with conditions where postfix may bring a 5.1-p10
server to a halt, making the server accept incoming ports (such as 22) but
serve nothing, making getty(8) become non-respondent (pressing enter
doesn't give any feedback) and making the server ignore ctrl-alt-del etc?
I've g
I thought the wizards who can do math would find this amusing:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
11 root -160 0K12K RUN451:16 101.56% 101.56% idle
738 sean760 52836K 39620K select 16:46 0.78% 0.78% kope
Hello. I've experienced some crashes here with FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT from
October 7th. I tried yesterday to upgrade to a more recent CURRENT but it
crashed (the 2nd. crash here).
Both crashes stop at different places, but they both refer to
Xint0x80_syscall - I don't know if this is relevant or no
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:45, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> A ULE UP kernel compiled fresh tonight (2003-10-28). Not critical,
> but certainly interesting. -sc
Anybody running ULE + KSE on an SMP kernel without any problems?
My symptoms are as such:
- idle and total cpu usage never goes above 54%
> Hi,
> are anyone familiar with conditions where postfix may bring a 5.1-p10
> server to a halt, making the server accept incoming ports (such as 22) but
> serve nothing, making getty(8) become non-respondent (pressing enter
> doesn't give any feedback) and making the server ignore ctrl-alt-del e
David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:11:53AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails
with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected
soon?
I
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:51:59PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to
> > on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice. This behavior on 5.X breaks
> > RFC2553/3493, and the change wa
Sam Leffler wrote:
Any chance you can get a stack trace the next time this happens? The LOR by
itself is hard to go from...
Hi Sam,
i get a slightly different LOR.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc2dd6c90 rtentry (rtentry) @ /space/src/sys/net/route.c:182
2nd 0xc2d4887c radix node head (radix node
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:18:39AM +0100, Bernhard Valenti wrote:
> hi,
>
> a buildworld with a de_AT locale fails in src/lib/libedit, the file
> fcnl.h that gets created is broken. i found that problem in the mailing
> list(april this year), and wonder if this has still not been fixed?
It alre
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:45:49 +1000
matti k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:36:56 +0200
> Eirik Oeverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I might also point out that there are two distinct kinds of
> > distortion happening: The click/pop/crackle kind of distortion,
> > and one w
On 28 Oct 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> It is NOT useless. Why do you think it is? Perhaps you don't relize
> that some BIOS's wont boot from a hard disk that isn't partitioned to
> agree with the specifications of the PeeCee. If you want to treat your
> PC as a Sun, don't -- buy a Sun, FreeBSD r
On 29 Oct 2003, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote:
> are anyone familiar with conditions where postfix may bring a 5.1-p10
> server to a halt, making the server accept incoming ports (such as 22) but
> serve nothing, making getty(8) become non-respondent (pressing enter
> doesn't give any feedb
I don't know if this is a known problem, but...
lock order reversal
1st 0xc25cb818 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1319
2nd 0xc0934b40 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @
/usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pag
er.c:1835
3rd 0xc1033534 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of
FreeBSD 5.2.
FreeBSD 5.2 Op
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:00:22AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list.
> The live version of this list is available at:
>
> Desired features for 5.2-RELEASE
>
> +-
> Test for scheduling buildworlds:
>
> cd /usr/src/usr.bin
> for i in obj depend all
> do
> MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i
> done >/tmp/zqz 2>&1
>
> (Run this with an empty /somewhere/obj. The all stage doesn't quite
> finish.) On an ABI
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
If we ship with a default of v6only off, then people will
not fix software to open two sockets. This in turn means that
turning v6only on will break this software.
I find the notion of making people "fix" their software to not rely on
RFC-defined behaviour problemati
Hi,
i have similar problems described in .
Two differnet Servers:
A) PIII 1 GHz Dual, Scsi, 1 GB RAM
B) XEON 3.06 GHz Dual, Adaptec SCSI Raid, 4 GB RAM
A runs fine, B crashes once a day between 12 and 24 hours uptime.
B has Apache (2.0.47) with SSL, now i will log incoming https
connections, m
I wrote:
I find the notion of making people "fix" their software to not rely on
RFC-defined behaviour problematic. I'm actually glad to see NetBSD
reversed their unfortunate decision regarding the default (and OpenBSD's
stunt of not even providing a knob is very evil indeed).
I understand that
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:00:33AM +0800, Clive Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen lots of messages on rescent -CURRENT
>
> malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
> exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0 (0xe044eca8) locked @
> /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:351
> malloc() of "1
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first
> slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation
> system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP.
> Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0
< said:
> initial complaints, I do think that fdisk/disklabel in sysinstall
> need to be improved upon. They do not handle multi-terabyte disk
> arrays properly at all
You should probably use GPT on multi-terabyte disk arrays.
-GAWollman
___
[EMAIL P
Doug White wrote:
"Missing operating system" comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the
BIOS.
Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then.
Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead.
This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact
system up with
On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Oct 28), John Baldwin said:
>> On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote:
>> > I've gotten the following panic twice in the last few days. I'm
>> > pretty sure truss has something to do with it, since I just started
>> > trussing something when it pan
Usually if networking locks up like this, you should check the mbuf
usage. It is possible for resource starvation to cause a situation where
TCP connections are accepted, but can't be sent data. "netstat -m"
If that doesn't work, I would recommend cvsup'ping one of the machines
to -current.
On 29 Oct 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
> > initial complaints, I do think that fdisk/disklabel in sysinstall
> > need to be improved upon. They do not handle multi-terabyte disk
> > arrays properly at all
>
> You should probably use GPT on multi-terabyte disk arrays.
At first,
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Test for scheduling buildworlds:
> >
> > cd /usr/src/usr.bin
> > for i in obj depend all
> > do
> > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i
> > done >/tmp/zqz 2>&1
> >
> > (Run this with an empty /somewhere/obj.
Hi,
i am using current. Similar problems *without* postfix. Login via ssh
results in print motd, but nothing more.
Login on local console results in nothing after pressing enter on
username.
Andy
You (Tom) wrote:
>
> Usually if networking locks up like this, you should check the mbuf
> usage
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead.
> > This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact
> > system up with redhat on the first disk and it works perfectly.
>
> Grub do not supporting UFS2. S
In the last episode (Oct 29), John Baldwin said:
> On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Oct 28), John Baldwin said:
> >> On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote:
> >> > The fault address is 0x24 so it looks like a null pointer
> >> > dereference of some sort. I've added asserts to
> >
All the time or sometimes? An unresponsive local console means that the
entire machine is blocked though, not just networking. I'm using
5-current right now, and obviously I'm able to type this e-mail.
Tom
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Andy Hilker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i am using current. Similar probl
Hi Tom,
not all the time, sorry about my bad english :) Sometimes, mostly
once a day... see another mail to list from me, sent a few hours
ago. This mail describes the problems more detailed.
This night i will change RAM to see if it was faulty. But i do not
think so.
Andy
You (Tom) wrote:
>
I'm committing changes to mark various network drivers' interrupt handlers
MPSAFE. To insure folks have a way to backout if they hit problems I've also
added a tunable that lets you disable this w/o rebuilding your kernel. By
default all network drivers that register an interrupt handler INTR_M
Doug White wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
this was fixed last night in:
src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8
src/lib/msun/src/e_scalb.c,v1.10
The fix was to use the old versions of isnan() and isinf()
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> Doug White wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
> >>this was fixed last night in:
> >>
> >>src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8
> >>src/
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:24:28PM -0500, Mathew Kanner wrote:
> Hello All,
> I tried to fix some LOR in -current and attached you will find
> some patches.
> I sent these to the -sound list but I didn't get a response.
> (Maybe I should mention that I'm also part of the -sound list).
Robert Watson wrote:
I had a fair amount of time over the last week running in disconnected
operation, and realized I had too many cables under my desk, so I spent a
bit of time exploring the FreeBSD console code.
Robert,
I just tried this out (version 0.4) and I like it!! Thanks for the
great w
On Oct 29, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:24:28PM -0500, Mathew Kanner wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > I tried to fix some LOR in -current and attached you will find
> > some patches.
> > I sent these to the -sound list but I didn't get a response.
> > (Maybe I should mention t
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> > Doug White wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
> > >>this was fixed last night in:
>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
Doug White wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
this was fixed last night in:
src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8
src/l
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an
> issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe
> libm.so is stil
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> > > Doug White wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted
00"
> set hint.fe.0.at="isa"
> set hint.fe.0.disabled="1"
> set hint.fe.0.port="0x300"
> set hint.le.0.at="isa"
> set hint.le.0.disabled="1"
> set hint.le.0.port="0x300"
> set hint.le.0.irq="5"
> set hin
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:07:27PM -0700, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install 5.1-R or 5.1-C from floppies redirected output to serial port
> and it won't boot to the install screen. 4.9-R floppies with output redirected to
> serial port works and installs properly. This
I followed the instructions found in the handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-advanced.html
I've used this method for all my SuperMicro 6013P-8 servers some running
5.1-R and others 4.8-R
Thanks,
Stephane.
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:15:00PM -0700, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
> I followed the instructions found in the handbook.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-advanced.html
>
> I've used this method for all my SuperMicro 6013P-8 servers some running
> 5.1-R and oth
Hi,
Using todays current, I'm finding that FreeBSD locks up completely on
boot if I don't have a disk in my LS-120 drive. There is no panic, it
just seems to freeze. I have included a dmesg from a boot with a disk in
the drive and indicated the point at which it freezes without the disk
in. It
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Doug White wrote:
> > "Missing operating system" comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the
> > BIOS.
>
> Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then.
It means you were barking up the wrong tree :)
>
> > Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use
Hi There,
Any time I try to install my 5.1 current version I have got this error:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
and I need install all again
someone can help me please
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
_
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an
> issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe
> libm.so is stil
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:53:44PM +1300, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
> Hi There,
> Any time I try to install my 5.1 current version I have got this error:
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
> and I need install all again
> someone can help me please
It sounds like you've
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote:
> > > On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > > As far as debugging prints, add the following printfs to
> > > > acpi_cmbat_get_bif():
> > > >
> > > > printf("Before getting BIF\n");
> > > > as = AcpiEvaluateObject(h, "_BIF", NULL, &bif_bu
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an
issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe
l
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:07:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>
> > I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> > the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an
> > issue with both
dear all,
i wanna patch my kernel so that my freebsd support SATA
but, when i tried to download the patch, the patch wasn't completed
http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/sata.patch
+ return 0;
}
if (ch->flags & ATA_DMA_ACTIVE) {
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:40:29PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:07:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> > > I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> > > the libm fix from a f
I am trying to get my Palm Tungsten-E to sync with my FreeBSD
4.8-STABLE from October 23 (about a week ago). I seem not to be able to
access /dev/ucom0 from pilot-xfer or jpilot, and the PPP workaround that
others have suggested I can't seem to quite get working. I have heard
rumors that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
FreeBSD 5.1-p10 (and also possible other 5.1-pX version) can be remotely
locked up if the following criteria is met:
+ apache2 has mod_ssl loaded and enabled
+ apache2 has the following configuration directives set to the
following values:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:37:56AM +0100, "Branko F. Gra?nar" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> FreeBSD 5.1-p10 (and also possible other 5.1-pX version) can be remotely
> locked up if the following criteria is met:
>
> + apache2 has mod_ssl loaded and enabled
> + apache2 has the following configuration directives
66 matches
Mail list logo
