Re: Sched_Ule

I ran with SCHED_ULE for a couple days recently and had trouble beyond just sluggishness. When doing really intensive tasks such as buildworld or installworld, the computer would actually stall. The first time was immediately after booting single user after building the world and kernel. I star

Re: UDMA33 on older acer aladdin chips

It seems Daniel Rock wrote: > > I recently decided to update my alpha UP1000 to today's current from a > > mid-July build. However, UDMA33 did not work on a hard disk attached > > to the built-in Acer Aladdin controller (verbose dmesg appended). > > > > I think I have narrowed the problem down to

Re: ipnat memory leak?

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:51:52PM -0600, Vector wrote: > I was using ipfw and natd but I wanted to move nat into the kernel so I > recompiled with ipfilter and ipnat. Now, after terminating natd, and > setting up ipnat rules in /etc/ipnat.rules, I see memory increase at a rate > of just under 1MB

panic: vm_map_wire: lookup failed

Hi, The latest development source of ntpd started to use setrlimit() before using mlockall(). This combination proves fatal on -current. The code in ntpd/ntpd.c looks like this: ### #if defined(HAVE_MLOCKALL) && defined(MCL_CURRENT) && defined(MCL_FUTURE) # ifdef HAVE_SETRLIMIT /*

Re: Why is em nic generating interrupts?

"Michael O. Boev" wrote: > I've got a [uniprocessor 5.1-RELEASE] router machine with fxp and em nics. > I've built my kernel with the following included: > > options DEVICE_POLLING > options HZ=2500 > > and enabled polling in /etc/sysctl.conf. [ ... ] > What's happening? Is pollin

Re: Nvidia driver

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 19:53, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Justin Smith wrote: > If you hook up a serial console, are there any messages that get printed > out? Unfortunately, I have no way of doing this on the machine that has the nvidia card. I think the "random" crashes

Re: Nvidia driver

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thursday 09 October 2003 01:41, Justin Smith wrote: > > > Ahh! > > > Here is a fragment of my loader.conf.. > > > nvidia_load="YES" > > > machdep.disable_mtrrs="1" > > > hw.nvidia.registry.ReqAGPRate="1" > > > > Although this fix alloes me to

11b/g PCMCIA

Hi, does it plan to support PCMCIA card Proxim Orinoco model 8471-WD in FreeBSD? There isn't in 'man ath' ... Tin INVEXOVÉ CENOVÉ ŠÍLENSTVÍ V DEXXU - superakční našlapaná sestava DEXX Narsil 18a za neuvěřitelných 1

ATA broken as of yesterday?

A machine I had recompiled with a CVSUP as of yesterday (and again today, to no avail) can't mount root from a HPT370 (/dev/ar0s1a) RAID 1 array anymore, with the saved old kernel (two weeks or so I think) it boots without any trouble. Regards, Gabriel ___

Buildkernel with SCHED_ULE fails

Hi, Can someone tell me what is needed to play with the new scheduler these days? I seem to be completely unable to compile my kernel with it enabled, getting lots of undefined references to sched_*. Have I missed some critical information? /Eirik __

Re: UDMA33 on older acer aladdin chips

Soren Schmidt writes: > > Yep, thats close, I have a patch out for testing that looks semilar, > if you can confirm it works, I'll commit it asap: > > And yes pointy hat to me :) > This fixes my box with the acer aladdin chip. Thanks! Drew __

RE: Why is em nic generating interrupts?

> -Original Message- > From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:19 PM > To: Michael O. Boev > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why is em nic generating interrupts? > > > "Michael O. Boev" wrote: > > I've got a [uniprocessor 5.1-RELEASE] router

Re: Sched_Ule

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 11:28 pm, Scott Sipe wrote: > Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes > this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment > practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is very slow, feels > 10x more sluggi

panic: pmap_enter: attempted pmap_enter on 4MB page

Hi, this panic just happened on a i386/SMP box with yesterday's current: %% Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #6: Thu O

SMBFS with EMC Celerra

Gordon, did you ever get a resolution for this? We have an EMC NS600 and are migrating macs to the Celerra. Jim Kunysz ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL

Re: ipnat memory leak?

Quoting Vector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Several reasons: > > Having it in the kernel improves performance It also avoids at least 2 context switches per packet... one when the packet goes into natd and one when it goes back to the kernel. > > natd chokes on the latest windoze worms and I have imple

Re: Sched_Ule

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Evan Dower wrote: > I ran with SCHED_ULE for a couple days recently and had trouble beyond just > sluggishness. When doing really intensive tasks such as buildworld or > installworld, the computer would actually stall. The first time was > immediately after booting single user

RE: Why is em nic generating interrupts?

From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Michael O. Boev" wrote: > > I've got a [uniprocessor 5.1-RELEASE] router machine with > fxp and em nics. > > I've built my kernel with the following included: > > > > options DEVICE_POLLING > > options HZ=2500 > > > > and enabled p

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

> "Daniel" == Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> The only reason most people will ever touch /dev is to either Daniel> make devices (hence no longer necessary with devfs), or change Daniel> permissions. The later is more difficult with devfs, but IMHO Daniel> the tradeoff is w

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, David Gilbert wrote: DG>> "Daniel" == Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DG> DG>Daniel> The only reason most people will ever touch /dev is to either DG>Daniel> make devices (hence no longer necessary with devfs), or change DG>Daniel> permissions. The later is more

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Gilbert writes: >But filesystems also have persistence. In the trivial case, the >persistence of the object (say ... a disk) preserved the filesystems >node. But if I walk into /dev and change the permissions on a node, >this persists only until the next reb

Re: Sched_Ule

Dual AMD Athlon MP 1900+s actually, on an Asus motherboard. -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL P

backup doesn't compare to primary bootblock

I`m getting that error when trying to run fsck_msdos on one of my partitions. This also make my system not-bootable(that is, i can boot, but i have to run fsck manually.) the part will mount, no problem there :/ Running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10. -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Sols

Re: 11b/g PCMCIA

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > does it plan to support PCMCIA card Proxim Orinoco model 8471-WD in FreeBSD? If someone wants to work on it and can get specs, sure. Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org

Re: Buildkernel with SCHED_ULE fails

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone tell me what is needed to play with the new scheduler these > days? I seem to be completely unable to compile my kernel with it > enabled, getting lots of undefined references to sched_*. Replace SCHED_4BSD with SCHED_ULE in your kern

Re: backup doesn't compare to primary bootblock

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Christer Solskogen wrote: > I`m getting that error when trying to run fsck_msdos on one of my > partitions. This also make my system not-bootable(that is, i can boot, but > i have to run fsck manually.) > the part will mount, no problem there :/ Sounds like fsck_msdos has beco

Re: backup doesn't compare to primary bootblock

> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Christer Solskogen wrote: > >> I`m getting that error when trying to run fsck_msdos on one of my >> partitions. This also make my system not-bootable(that is, i can boot, >> but >> i have to run fsck manually.) >> the part will mount, no problem there :/ > > Sounds like fsck_

Re: Nvidia driver

On Oct 09, "Justin Smith" wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 19:53, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Justin Smith wrote: > > > If you hook up a serial console, are there any messages that get printed > > out? > > Unfortunately, I have no way of doing this on the machine that has

Re[2]: Sched_Ule

JR> Do you have P4's with hyper threading? Why? Are there particular issues with HT and ULE? The normal scheduler doesn't seem to utilize the second "virtual" processor at all (as long as I trust in what top tells me). Any suggestions how to build a desktop system (i.e. with X, audio/video etc.) k

Re: ipnat memory leak?

At 12:56 AM -0600 2003/10/09, Vector wrote: natd chokes on the latest windoze worms and I have implemented some DoS prevention/worm protection in ipnat but I'm seeing this memory leak without my improvements there at all. If it's in the kernel, ipnat is kept under control when natd would norma

Re: ATA broken as of yesterday?

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:36:12 +0200 Gabriel Ambuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A machine I had recompiled with a CVSUP as of yesterday (and again > today, to no avail) can't mount root from a HPT370 (/dev/ar0s1a) > RAID 1 array anymore, with the saved old kernel (two weeks or so I > think) it boot

ATA_IDENTITY soft error

Did a -CURRENT buildworld this AM, and restarted on the new kernel. On detecting ad0, it throws an error: ad0: 38166MB [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA 100 ata1-master: WARNING - ATA_IDENTITY soft error (ECC corrected) What's this? Patrick ___ [EMAIL

Re: panic: vm_map_wire: lookup failed

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:59:35AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > The latest development source of ntpd started to use setrlimit() before > using mlockall(). This combination proves fatal on -current. The code > in ntpd/ntpd.c looks like this: [snip] I'll look into this. BMS ___

ATAng errors on compaq proliant 330e

hi this verbosed dmesg is from my box maybe it help you have a nice day -- Archeologists near mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated in Bonn. If genuine it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is bel

Re: ATAng errors on compaq proliant 330e

It seems Radko Keves wrote: > hi > > this verbosed dmesg is from my box maybe it help you Uhm, and what exactly is the problem ? -Søren ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send an

failed -current build

Today I attempted to build the latest -current but got the following when trying to compile the kernel: ../../../dev/cardbus/cardbus.c:380: error: `card_cis_read_desc' undeclared here (not in a function) ../../../dev/cardbus/cardbus.c:380: error: initializer element is not constant ../../../dev/ca

Re: Sched_Ule

On (2003/10/09 00:28), Scott Sipe wrote: > Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes > this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment > practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is very slow, feels > 10x more sluggish than normal.

Re: Sched_Ule

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2003/10/09 00:28), Scott Sipe wrote: > > > Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes > > this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment > > practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is

Re: Sched_Ule

On (2003/10/09 16:57), Jeff Roberson wrote: > > For me, the sluggish mouse problem manifests under these conditions: > > > > 1) Use a USB mouse, not a PS2 mouse. > > Is this _only_ with usb? For me, yes. -CURRENT gets a little sluggish with either scheduler, but the noticible difference between

Problem building net-snmp on 5.1-release-p10

Hello I'm trying to build net-snmp but I get this build error: mv -f host/.libs/hr_system.lo host/hr_system.lo /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -I../../include -I../../include -I. -I../.. -I. -I./../.. -I./../../snmplib -I./.. -I.. -DINET6 -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Dfreebsd5 -c -o ho

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1 TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/alpha TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/alpha/alpha ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscr

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2003-10-09 20:32:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-10-09 20:32:02 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-09 20:34:28 - building world TB

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/i386/pc98 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/sparc64 TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/sparc64/sparc64 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Sched_Ule

On Thursday 09 October 2003 22:57, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On (2003/10/09 00:28), Scott Sipe wrote: > > > Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file > > > makes this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X > > > envir

include/xmmintrin.h

Hi, include/xmmintrin.h defines __v4si twice, once in line 45, and once again in line 1113 inside an __SSE2__ ifdef block. This causes errors when building ports that define __SSE2__. I locally fixed this by removing the second definition of __v4si. Not sure what the right solution is, because xmm

Re: Sched_Ule

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > 1) Use a USB mouse, not a PS2 mouse. > > Is this _only_ with usb? Is moused running? That would give an extra scheduling complication.. > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

Re: Why is em nic generating interrupts?

On Thursday 09 October 2003 05:57 am, Michael O. Boev wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:19 PM > > To: Michael O. Boev > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Why is em nic generating interrupts? > > > >

panic: The GEOM class BDE already loaded

Hi, just got the following panic on my server. The panic occured while trying to attach a gbde encrypted disk. geom_bde is compiled into the kernel. Dump and debugging kernel are available for further debugging. Sources are from October 9th, around 2 PM CET. GNU gdb 5.3 (FreeBSD) Copyright 20

Re: ipnat memory leak?

> > > natd chokes on the latest windoze worms and I have implemented some DoS > > prevention/worm protection in ipnat but I'm seeing this memory leak without > > my improvements there at all. > > > > If it's in the kernel, ipnat is kept under control when natd would normally > > be sucking the

Re: ath0 stop connection

Hi there. I have 2 FreeBSD with a Atheros chipset wireless card one Access point one client, I pinging between the wiereless link (ping -s 25000 client_ip) and I have very good speed on turbo mode close to 3,2Mbps/s but after 3 hours the Freebsd AP cut the connection and put in the screen a sh

Re: ipnat memory leak?

At 6:37 PM -0600 2003/10/09, Vector wrote: However, as soon as I put it in the kernel, ipnat -l and ipnat -t became my best friends. They are incredibly useful. Okay, now that you explain it that way, it makes sense. That was very interesting to r

Re: Sched_Ule

How many of the people experiencing SCHED_ULE related problems (primarily lagging) are also using nvidia-driver? I know I am, and I'm pretty sure Arjan is. Could there be a connection? -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.ed

Re: i865 Video Memory

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 10:10 am, David Malone wrote: > > You can just run "855patch 8192" before starting X, and suddenly > you can do a resolution higher than 640x480 in 8 bit mode ;-) Kewl. What do we have to do to convince you to make a port of it? ;^) -- Where am I, and what

Re: Sched_Ule

On Thursday 09 October 2003 08:16 pm, Evan Dower wrote: > How many of the people experiencing SCHED_ULE related problems (primarily > lagging) are also using nvidia-driver? I know I am, and I'm pretty sure > Arjan is. Could there be a connection? I switched back to the XFree86 nv driver earlier to

Re: Sched_Ule

From: Jonathan E Fosburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I switched back to the XFree86 nv driver earlier today and still have trouble. moused is running and it is a PS/2 mouse. Is nvidia.ko still loaded in the kernel? -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http:

Re: Can not remove directory

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > Can not remove directory /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 rm: > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1: Directory not empty What's going on is that the background file system checker hasn't adjusted down the reference counts for the directory in q

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

TB --- 2003-10-10 04:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-10 04:00:01 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-10 04:03:53 - building world TB --- cd /

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2003-10-10 04:10:17 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-10-10 04:10:17 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-10 04:12:31 - building world TB --- cd /home

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2003-10-10 04:19:20 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-10-10 04:19:20 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-10 04:21:07 - building world TB --- cd /home

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2003-10-10 04:27:43 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-10-10 04:27:43 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-10 04:29:31 - building world TB

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

[releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

5.1-RELEASE: Random lockups; ACPI issues; minor annoyances

I've encountered some suspicious random lock-ups under 5.1-RELEASE while running KDE 3.1.2. They occur on a monthly basis. The machine doesn't panic and I haven't been able to drop to the debugger yet. Severity of the lock-ups has ranged from the odd time being able to partially continue using s

Re: [releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [nothing] argh! /me fix DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC