On 9/9/20 5:40 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Ryan Moeller wrote:
On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
has. It's something that needs to
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Ryan Moeller wrote:
>
> On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> > On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
> >> OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
> >> has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can
On 2020-09-09 17:55, Ryan Moeller wrote:
On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be
integrated downstream.
So curre
On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be
integrated downstream.
So currently all pools created with OpenZFS will
On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be
integrated downstream.
So currently all pools created with OpenZFS will use 512 bit alignment,
at least if the unde
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 22:26, Matthew Macy wrote:
>
> This long since been fixed. Note that Ryan built working installer images
> during the CFT.
Yep, thanks for the note and sorry for the false alarm; it was a local
issue and I've closed the PR.
___
fr
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 17:08 Ed Maste wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 20:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
>
> >
>
> > OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
>
> > has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be
>
> > integrated downstream.
>
>
>
> Note th
On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 20:20, Matthew Macy wrote:
>
> OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
> has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be
> integrated downstream.
Note that our installer tries to set the min_auto_ashift when ZFS is
selected -
OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD
has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be
integrated downstream.
-M
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:04 AM Graham Perrin wrote:
>
> In my sysctl.conf:
>
> vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift=12
>
> – if I recall correct
Looks like it should still be there if your using the in tree ZFS:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev.c?revision=358333&view=markup#l144
On 01/05/2020 19:03, Graham Perrin wrote:
In my sysctl.conf:
vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift=12
– if I recall c
In my sysctl.conf:
vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift=12
– if I recall correctly, the line was written automatically when I
installed FreeBSD-CURRENT a year or so ago.
With OpenZFS enabled:
root@momh167-gjp4-8570p:~ # sysctl vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift
sysctl: unknown oid 'vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift'
Should
11 matches
Mail list logo
