On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Ryan Moeller wrote: > > On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > > On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote: > >> OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD > >> has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be > >> integrated downstream. > > > > So currently all pools created with OpenZFS will use 512 bit > > alignment, at least if the underlying storage device uses 512bit > > sectors (which most drives tend to do)? > > > > If this is the case, it feels like a pessimisation. > > > > Regards > > > The vdev ashift optimizations from FreeBSD were put in OpenZFS before > the import into base. That sysctl does work now.
Ugly hack w/ geom_noop required again? _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
