Wouldn't it be better if you didn't do the bogus locking in the attach
routine? It would be better to not lock at all and not initialize the
ISR until last. That's what I did with if_rl. Let's not work around
the bogus locking, but insteal eliminate it. There's no way that the
driver can interr
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Attached is a diff that fixes a "could sleep" problem where
> > ether_ifattach() does a malloc and dc(4) is holding a lock in its softc.
> > It uses a cleaner exit strategy with only one call to DC_UNLOCK and no
> > multiple retur
Nate Lawson wrote:
> Attached is a diff that fixes a "could sleep" problem where
> ether_ifattach() does a malloc and dc(4) is holding a lock in its softc.
> It uses a cleaner exit strategy with only one call to DC_UNLOCK and no
> multiple return statements as well as fixing one place where "erro
Attached is a diff that fixes a "could sleep" problem where
ether_ifattach() does a malloc and dc(4) is holding a lock in its softc.
It uses a cleaner exit strategy with only one call to DC_UNLOCK and no
multiple return statements as well as fixing one place where "error"
wasn't set. If people a
