Yes I understand it's true there are many options I will test what I can
for my AMD 64 machine since it's a laptop I can probably start making some
reports and also look into ZFS snapshots and tunables. Thank you very much
it was helpful
___
freebsd-curre
Good morning Roberto,
It depends which architecture are you currently using. Ideally the tests
should be run in each CPU type for each architecture and for each
combination of options in the make.conf, src.conf and src-env.conf. That
could last for ever. Feel free to test whatever you can. For ins
On 2003.06.23 19:42:25 +0200, Byron Schlemmer wrote:
> Had a quick search around mail archives and problem reports. Did spot
> anything, but it seems
>
> MASTER_SITE_BACKUP?=
> MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE?=
>
> work in make.conf for 5 however make.conf(5) doesn't seem to mention it?
> Is this a featur
I'll look into this ;)
--
Tom Rhodes
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:44:29 +1100 (EST)
Andy Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Carl Schmidt wrote:
>
> > The following PR has two patches attached which address the lack of
> > some documentation of make.conf in the manual page. It a
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Carl Schmidt wrote:
> The following PR has two patches attached which address the lack of some
> documentation of make.conf in the manual page. It also contains a patch
> for make.conf to fix style inconsistencies and two (if I recall
> correctly) items which are documented i
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:37:32PM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:10:14 -0500
> Carl Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:53:35AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:09:14 +0200
> > > Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:10:14 -0500
Carl Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:53:35AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:09:14 +0200
> > Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On (2002/11/19 15:17), Carl Schmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > > The following
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:53:35AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:09:14 +0200
> Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On (2002/11/19 15:17), Carl Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > The following PR has two patches attached which address the lack of
> > > some documentation of make.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:09:14 +0200
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (2002/11/19 15:17), Carl Schmidt wrote:
>
> > The following PR has two patches attached which address the lack of
> > some documentation of make.conf in the manual page. It also
> > contains a patch for make.conf to
On (2002/11/19 15:17), Carl Schmidt wrote:
> The following PR has two patches attached which address the lack of some
> documentation of make.conf in the manual page. It also contains a patch
> for make.conf to fix style inconsistencies and two (if I recall
> correctly) items which are documented
On Fri, 10 May 2002 17:46:31 EST, "David W. Chapman Jr." wrote:
> > sysctl.conf is also missing. If its not there, it doesn't get
> > parsed. You only need make.conf if you wish to put stuff in there.
> > same with rc.conf, except everyone puts something in rc.conf
> >
> N/m on the sysctl
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:40:11PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
> > something that I have messed up on my end?
> > I have run cvsup/merg
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
> something that I have messed up on my end?
> I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that
> changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* d
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps
> something that I have messed up on my end?
> I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that
> changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* d
Thus spake Ruslan Ermilov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> IIRC, it was requested by many that this change be backed out, no?
No, the discussion -arch converted to a discussion about the
implementation of a "world.conf" file, which implicits this
commit.
Alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Vincent Poy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I was looking on the -current tree and don't see make.conf in
> > either etc or etc/defaults. In previous versions, make.conf is in
> > etc/defaults and then you can put your
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Vincent Poy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I was looking on the -current tree and don't see make.conf in
> > either etc or etc/defaults. In previous versions, make.conf is in
> > etc/defaults and then you can put your own modifications in
Thus spake Vincent Poy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was looking on the -current tree and don't see make.conf in
> either etc or etc/defaults. In previous versions, make.conf is in
> etc/defaults and then you can put your own modifications in etc. So any
> chance of bringing back make.conf int
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Eric D. Futch wrote:
> I originally sent this to freebsd-stable but didn't get any replies. It
> has been reworded.
>
> I ran across this while playing with the INSTALL knob in make.conf. In
> almost all of the Makefiles in src/ there is either -C or -c hard coded as
> an
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:32:36AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > OTOH, bsd.cpu.mk is too under-engineered to support any compiler except
> > gcc. It unconditionally translates FreeBSD-specific names like k6-2 to
> > gcc-specific flags like -march=k6.
>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:32:36AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> k6-2 is already over-engineered. The only difference between it and k6
> is 3dnow, but neither gcc nor any source files support 3dnow (now :-).
3dnow support exists in several ports, though.
OTOH, k6-3 doesn't add any new features,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:32:36AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> k6-2 is already over-engineered. The only difference between it and k6
> is 3dnow, but neither gcc nor any source files support 3dnow (now :-).
Binutils 2.11.0 and GCC 3.0 will. :-)
> OTOH, bsd.cpu.mk is too under-engineered to supp
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr=
> > > ote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >=20
> > > > Is there anything against adding support for
> > > > k6-3 to the just added CPUTYPE mechanism? :)
> > >
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >
> >
> > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr=
> > ote:
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > >
>
>
> --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr=
> ote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > Is there anything against adding suppo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything against adding support for
> k6-3 to the just added CPUTYPE mechanism? :)
> My little machine feels left out. Hehehhe
> I made a simple patch to etc/defaults/make.conf
> a
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:09:02AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> Waitaminit. These are correct, please look at bsd.sites.mk. What
> makes you think they are not working?
Hmm... weird. I tried using the overrides in make.conf some time ago
and they didn't work and I had to use
* From: Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Hi -current and -ports,
*
* I've noticed something that seems to have been broken for a long time.
* In etc/defaults/make.conf we have several MASTER_SITE_* variables which
* reference "%SUBDIR%". However, these variables do not work as expected.
>> but current as of today is stomping on /usr/sbin/sendmail, /usr/bin/mailq,
>> etc. all about /usr/sbin/mailwrapper.
> Yeah, that bit me too but I forgot to post a message here. I'm using
> postfix and I just changed /etc/mail/mailer.conf to this:
>
> sendmail/usr/local/sbin/sendmail
>
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 04:27:26PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> my /etc/make.conf has NO_SENDMAIL=true
>
> but current as of today is stomping on /usr/sbin/sendmail, /usr/bin/mailq,
> etc. all about /usr/sbin/mailwrapper.
Yeah, that bit me too but I forgot to post a message here. I'm using
postfi
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
;-><
said:
;->
;->> This is going in the right direction, but here is a question (and I don't
;->> have the answer). Is it so much more easier to create new compile time
;->> directive than to go the extra step and use packages where they are
;->> avail
< said:
> This is going in the right direction, but here is a question (and I don't
> have the answer). Is it so much more easier to create new compile time
> directive than to go the extra step and use packages where they are
> available ? For example "bind8" is available as a package. Why not h
Hi,
From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I was not talking about things that constitute the "real" core of the
> > distribution (kernel, basic libraries etc.). I was more thinking about
> > "userland" stuff that is included in the distribution but might not be
> > r
In message <011801bf159c$f80630e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Patrick Bihan-
Faou" writes:
> Hi,
>
> From: Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There are a _lot_ of pitfalls to this kind of approach, as I have
> > discovered using Linux Debian. This would probably open a can of
> > worms you have n
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You'll also need the a.out X11 libraries, and last time I tried,
> they built OK, but wouldn't work.
They build OK and work fine.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
"Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You'll also want to use:
>
>make world -DWANT_AOUT=YES
>
>to have the a.out libraries built.
You'll also need the a.out X11 libraries, and last time I tried,
they built OK, but wouldn't work.
Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> compat22=yes in /etc/make.conf accomplishes a.out support which we need
> for netscape support. Correct?
>
You will also need a.out libraries from XFree86 in order to get Netscape
working.
> What does compat3x do however? Provide ELF compatibilit
37 matches
Mail list logo
