Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >
> >
> > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr=
> > ote:
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > Is there anything against adding support for
> > > k6-3 to the just added CPUTYPE mechanism? :)
> > > My little machine feels left out. Hehehhe
> > > I made a simple patch to etc/defaults/make.conf
> > > and share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk
> > > Should I have touched anything else?
> > >=20
> > > Regards,
> > >=20
> > > ps: I think this can be MFCed asap (even during the
> > > veil period) since it is very straightforward.
> >
> > Looks fine to me. I'll commit it.
>
> I see no reason for it. k6-3 is essentially k6-2 core with extra cache on
> chip. Threre are no other significant differencies in the features or
> instruction set.
Not even to mention that there is such a beast as k6-2+....
I would suggest to rename k6-2 into k6/3dnow (similarly to what we have for
i586/mmx) and put a note saying that k6/3dnow should be used for k6-2/k6-2+/k6-3.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
