In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thomas Veldhouse
writes:
: So, my question is, why NOT? If the old drivers can do it and the Linux
: drivers can do it, I have to wonder why? This was a common interface to
: say the least.
Becaue they have data corruption bugs that can only partially be
worked a
At 11:38 AM 2/15/00 -0600, Thomas Veldhouse wrote:
>Great. Well, I am down too! I don't see any mention of this in any of
>the newsgroups (via Yahoo). I can not find a single reference. I don't
>remember seeing such a thing stated either.
Look through the mailing lists on www.dejanews.com. D
Great. Well, I am down too! I don't see any mention of this in any of
the newsgroups (via Yahoo). I can not find a single reference. I don't
remember seeing such a thing stated either.
So, my question is, why NOT? If the old drivers can do it and the Linux
drivers can do it, I have to wonder
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Thomas Veldhouse wrote:
> No overclocked bus. I do have the Pentium 166MMX overdrive processor on
> the board though. It used to have a 100MHz Pentium in it. However, if
> this is causing ATA some problem, it probably shouldn't. Like I said, the
> old
No overclocked bus. I do have the Pentium 166MMX overdrive processor on
the board though. It used to have a 100MHz Pentium in it. However, if
this is causing ATA some problem, it probably shouldn't. Like I said, the
old drivers in 3.4-STABLE have no problem with it and either does Linux.
Windo
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Soren, do you have any idea what might be the problem? Is there anything I
> can do to give you more information? I have 3.4-STABLE installed on the box
> presently - it is serving as my gateway/firewall, so it really can't afford
> much downtim
It seems Thomas Veldhouse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed over time that many people are test driving the new
> ATA
> Drivers. I attempted to do it a while back but I couldn't boot because of
> the device name changes. I did not know what the new device names were.
> Anyway - is there
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, David Krinsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:05:38AM +, Gary Hampton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Adam Strohl wrote:
> >
> > > Remake your acd device, I think you may need a patch to do it. I had the
> > > same problem, until I rm-ed the de
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:05:38AM +, Gary Hampton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Adam Strohl wrote:
>
> > Remake your acd device, I think you may need a patch to do it. I had the
> > same problem, until I rm-ed the device and remade it.
> >
> > - ( Adam Strohl )
It seems Gary Hampton wrote:
> I have been trying to get the ata drivers to work on my system for a
> a while now but can't seem to mount my cdrom drives. This is what I get on
> boot up:
> atapi: DMA transfer mode set
> acd0: CDROM drive at ata0 as master
I'll bet that your CDROM doesn't do DM
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Adam Strohl wrote:
> Remake your acd device, I think you may need a patch to do it. I had the
> same problem, until I rm-ed the device and remade it.
>
> - ( Adam Strohl ) -
> - UNIX Operations/Systems http:
Remake your acd device, I think you may need a patch to do it. I had the
same problem, until I rm-ed the device and remade it.
- ( Adam Strohl ) -
- UNIX Operations/Systems http://www.digitalspark.net -
- adams (at) digitalspar
12 matches
Mail list logo
