Peter Dufault wrote:
>
> > > For the record: If anyone wants labpc tested and kept up to date send
> > > me a card and I'll test it at each stable release cycle. Even better,
> > > also send me the register compatible DAQCARD 1200 PC card version.
> > >
> > > My former client using a batch of th
> > For the record: If anyone wants labpc tested and kept up to date send
> > me a card and I'll test it at each stable release cycle. Even better,
> > also send me the register compatible DAQCARD 1200 PC card version.
> >
> > My former client using a batch of those cards obviously
> > isn't sta
Peter Dufault wrote:
>
> >
> > >> >This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume
> > >> >this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also
> > >> >think it looks wrong.
> > >>
> > >> If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
>
>
> >> >This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume
> >> >this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also
> >> >think it looks wrong.
> >>
> >> If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
> >> that labpc doesn't work, the la
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> >> >This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume
> >> >this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also
> >> >think it looks wrong.
> >>
> >> If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
> >> that la
>> >This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume
>> >this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also
>> >think it looks wrong.
>>
>> If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
>> that labpc doesn't work, the labpc driver sho
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
> >I noticed the following while looking through the M_ZERO patches.
> >When you were cleaning up some dev stuff you made the following
> >change to labpc.c (revision 1.33):
> >
> >
> >labpcs = malloc(NLABPC
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
>I noticed the following while looking through the M_ZERO patches.
>When you were cleaning up some dev stuff you made the following
>change to labpc.c (revision 1.33):
>
>
>labpcs = malloc(NLABPC * sizeof(struct ctlr *), M_DEVBUF, M_NOW
