Peter Dufault wrote:
>
> >
> > >> >This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume
> > >> >this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also
> > >> >think it looks wrong.
> > >>
> > >> If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
> > >> that labpc doesn't work, the labpc driver should be killed, not fixed.
> > >>
> > >> Objections ?
> > >
> > >What you are saying is that people who may be using this driver have
> > >not yet moved up to -current or 4.x and as such should not be allowed
> > >to?
> >
> > I'm saying:
> >
> > "If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
> > that labpc doesn't work, the labpc driver should be killed, not fixed."
> >
> > That's 1.5 year Julian, and if nobody *who is using it* objects it goes.
>
> For the record: If anyone wants labpc tested and kept up to date send
> me a card and I'll test it at each stable release cycle. Even better,
> also send me the register compatible DAQCARD 1200 PC card version.
>
> My former client using a batch of those cards obviously
> isn't staying up to date on the OS. Anyone who upgrades a working
> system will be just as upset if it doesn't work as if it is gone
> so I defer on the axe discussion.
I gather you aren't in a position to test using your former client's
cards.. ("former" is a bit of a clue I guess). What are the chances that
he may decide one day to upgrade? (e.g. to support a new PC)
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Dufault ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Realtime development, Machine control,
> HD Associates, Inc. Fail-Safe systems, Agency approval
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000
---> X_.---._/ presently in: Budapest
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
