why can't you provide both in stable/10 ?
-a
On 13 January 2016 at 16:03, Allan Jude wrote:
> I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10:
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782
>
> It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c)
> wit
Oliver Pinter writes:
> Can you merge back the r261913 commit to stable/10 or is this a POLA
> violation?
It needs to be accompanied by r264964, and you should ask jmg@ about
merging r262945 and r263218 as well.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
__
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:03:50 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/06/2011 14:44 Johan Hendriks said the following:
> > Hello all i have a question regarding MFC
> >
> > At the svn page from head most revisions comments contain a line
> > like MFC after:x weeks or x days. or x months.
> > Is
on 24/06/2011 14:44 Johan Hendriks said the following:
> Hello all i have a question regarding MFC
>
> At the svn page from head most revisions comments contain a line like
> MFC after:x weeks or x days. or x months.
> Is this done automaticly, or is this still done by the auther.
It's do
On 06/21/2010 09:12, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> jhell writes:
>> Sorry but he only mention of filecomplete in your patch is in this
>> section. That is exactly the same in the patch I had originally
>> generated using SVN.
>
> Umm, the copy I have on my disk has those files. Just to be sure, I
2010/6/21 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> jhell writes:
>> Because SVN in both our patches for tab completion missed filecomplete.h
>> and filecomplete.c [...] the previous patches from des@ &
>> myself will break world builds.
>
> Speak for yourself. Both files are present in the patch I posted, and I
>
jhell writes:
> Because SVN in both our patches for tab completion missed filecomplete.h
> and filecomplete.c [...] the previous patches from des@ &
> myself will break world builds.
Speak for yourself. Both files are present in the patch I posted, and I
tested it (make toolchain, which builds b
I should probably also mention that it does not have "username"
completion the the following form ~userna[TAB][TAB]
But does complete ~/[TAB][TAB] from your own home directory. And if you
spell out the username as ~username/[TAB][TAB] that will also work.
So do not be surprised.
--
jhell
___
On 06/16/2010 07:53, jhell wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 07:29, jhell wrote:
>> Just got home, So Ill be working on getting this put together over the
>> next few minutes and replying to this thread with a go or no go
>> depending on the outcome and posting the patch.
>
> Here it is:
>
> cd /usr/src
> p
On 06/16/2010 02:20, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>>> -Brandon
>>
>> Oh, I see. The diff doesn't include the change(s) to histedit.h
>>
>
> I would be very interested in a diff for FreeBSD 8.1
>
>
> Sam Fourman Jr.
> http://www.fourmannetworks.com/
Just got home, So Ill be working on getting this put
>> -Brandon
>
> Oh, I see. The diff doesn't include the change(s) to histedit.h
>
I would be very interested in a diff for FreeBSD 8.1
Sam Fourman Jr.
http://www.fourmannetworks.com/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:08 PM, jhell wrote:
>> On 06/15/2010 22:00, jhell wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2010 21:14, Brandon Gooch wrote:
I discovered a few moments ago that filename completion had been
committed to HEAD[1]!!!
>>>
This
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:08 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 22:00, jhell wrote:
>> On 06/15/2010 21:14, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>>> I discovered a few moments ago that filename completion had been
>>> committed to HEAD[1]!!!
>>
>>> This is a (seemingly) small, yet VERY useful addition, and, of cour
On 06/15/2010 22:00, jhell wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 21:14, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> I discovered a few moments ago that filename completion had been
>> committed to HEAD[1]!!!
>
>> This is a (seemingly) small, yet VERY useful addition, and, of course
>> I'm so grateful to Guy Yur and Jilles for getti
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 06:33:09PM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I searched the archives, and found this question asked, but no responses.
> I wonder when (if) Perl 5.6 will be MFC'd to 4.x.
^^
Uh, _*WHY*_ are you sending this to freebsd-current
I was thinking about that. Of course my skills limit me to the idea :-P
> Well, maybe if it would load automatically on first open.. :) We need
> some stub loader technology...
>
> - Jordan
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
16 matches
Mail list logo
