why can't you provide both in stable/10 ?
-a On 13 January 2016 at 16:03, Allan Jude <allanj...@freebsd.org> wrote: > I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782 > > It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c) > with cperciva@'s version from libmd. In benchmarks it was 5-30% faster, > on x86_64 and arm/mips. > > But, in head I ended up being asked to bump __FreeBSD_version because it > removes sys/crypto/sha2.h which was apparently used by a 3rd party > driver, and replaces it with sys/crypto/sha512.h > > Does this kind of change mean it cannot be MFCd to stable/10? Or is it > ok to MFC it? > > -- > Allan Jude > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
