> > Could you disable acpi and try again to make the problem clearer?
> > Without `device acpi' line in your kernel config file, any ACPI code
> > isn't compiled in your kernel.
>
> That was the first thing I tried when mine failed. It didn't make any
> difference - I saw the same failure (the pa
Mitsuru IWASAKI writes:
> All I can say is that acpi is initilized after pcib and its children
> are attached so I don't think ACPI code affects PCI stuff...
>
> > # Power management support (see LINT for more options)
> > #device apm
> > device acpi
>
> Could you disabl
> Could you disable acpi and try again to make the problem clearer?
> Without `device acpi' line in your kernel config file, any ACPI code
As I mentioned, I've already done so. I know ACPI isn't causing the panic,
but it does seem to change the BEHAVIOR of the panic. (I get the errors
mentione
Hi,
> And, of course, the kernel config... a fair amount of crap still not trimmed
> out, but the only difference between this config and the one used to build
> the functional kernel is apm commented out and ACPI added, which I've already
> tried reversing without much difference.
All I can say
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Brandon Hume wrote:
> Sounds similar to what I'm getting; after a boot I get a load of the
> following:
>
> ahc0: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid during SELTO (31, 255)
That's what I get... although I get SELTO (31, 0)
> Similar config to yours; a Tyan Thunder SMP BX
Chris Hedley writes:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Brandon Hume wrote:
> > Just after the "waiting for SCSI devices to settle" message, I'll get a
> > number of SCB errors (which I don't have written down, unfortunately), and
> > then eventually a panic. This is with ACPI enabled... if I don't enable
>
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Brandon Hume wrote:
> Just after the "waiting for SCSI devices to settle" message, I'll get a
> number of SCB errors (which I don't have written down, unfortunately), and
> then eventually a panic. This is with ACPI enabled... if I don't enable
> ACPI, it will proceed immedia
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I get the following:
>
> pci0: unknown card (vendor=0x9004, dev=0x5078) at 8.0 irq 11
Nothing has changed in this area for some time and the id for this
card is in the table of supported devices. Do you get any additional
information from a boot -v?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 03:07:13PM -0500, Brandon Gale wrote:
> I was under the impression that although the driver functions properly, the
> speed is still at 80MB/sec, and not the full 160MB/sec. Correct?
I can't say as there are only U2 drives connected.
--
B.Walter COSMO-P
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:00:56AM +0900, Osamu MIHARA wrote:
> Is anybody here working on driver for AIC-7899, Ataptec's Ultra160
> SCSI controller???
It's working fine here:
ahc1: port 0xb400-0xb4ff mem
0xdf80-0xdf800fff irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci0
OptionMode = 3
ahc1: aic7892 Wide Chan
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Osamu MIHARA writes:
: Is anybody here working on driver for AIC-7899, Ataptec's Ultra160
: SCSI controller???
I thought that Justin just did commits for this.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 20:11:38 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > It will only work at Ultra2 speeds right now, Ultra160 support is coming,
> > though.
>
> To be fair, the sym driver already supports Ultra3. And Qlogic Ultra3 support
> is coming too.
Yes, I should have qualified that. "Ultr
>
> It will only work at Ultra2 speeds right now, Ultra160 support is coming,
> though.
To be fair, the sym driver already supports Ultra3. And Qlogic Ultra3 support
is coming too.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:00:56 +0900, Osamu MIHARA wrote:
> Is anybody here working on driver for AIC-7899, Ataptec's Ultra160
> SCSI controller???
It should work fine under -current.
It will only work at Ultra2 speeds right now, Ultra160 support is coming,
though.
Ken
--
Kenneth Merry
[EMAI
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> > I cannot compile a kernel. It reports the following errors:
>
> Did the patch files.diff apply cleanly? It should add one line to each of
> the sys/conf/files and sys/i386/conf/files.i386, please make sure they
> are there.
>
The patches did not apply cleanly (maybe I s
> Luoqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > I compiled a kernel for -stable, but was unable to boot from it. Does anyone
> > know if there is any incompatibility between the -current boot loader and a
> > -stable kernel?
>
> AFAIK, there is no difference between them (the loaders :).
>
> Try from boot2.
>
It
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> I compiled a kernel for -stable, but was unable to boot from it. Does anyone
> know if there is any incompatibility between the -current boot loader and a
> -stable kernel?
AFAIK, there is no difference between them (the loaders :).
Try from boot2.
--
Daniel C. Sobral
> Luoqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > I've ported it to -stable, but I don't have a machine to test it, please
> > if you could. The code is in http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/aic/stable,
> > apply patch files.diff, copy aic_isa.c to i386/isa, the rest goes to dev/aic.
> >
>
> I cannot compile a kernel. It
> I also tried to experiment with the aic driver (and also failed, little
> similar to Ilya's problems)
>
Could you download the new set of files and see if it helps?
> as devices. What puzzles me is why the probe at the aic0 wants to look
> at bus 0. Shouldn't that be bus 1? Or should I add a s
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> I've ported it to -stable, but I don't have a machine to test it, please
> if you could. The code is in http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/aic/stable,
> apply patch files.diff, copy aic_isa.c to i386/isa, the rest goes to dev/aic.
>
I cannot compile a kernel. It reports the fol
I also tried to experiment with the aic driver (and also failed, little
similar to Ilya's problems)
Configuration:
Asus P2B-DS motherboard with dual PII-350, 128 Mb of memory, running
4.0-19990918-CURRENT.
Adaptec AIC 7890 on-board U2W SCSI controller.
Adaptec AVA 1505 (AIC 6360Q) isa SCSI contr
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Chris Dillon wrote:
>
> > Should this apply cleanly to -stable? If so, I'll give it a shot when
> > I get home.
>
> I'll answer my own question (which, oddly enough, still hasn't made it
> to the list after about two hours). I forgot about newbus. It
> doesn't work, of
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Chris Dillon wrote:
> Should this apply cleanly to -stable? If so, I'll give it a shot when
> I get home.
I'll answer my own question (which, oddly enough, still hasn't made it
to the list after about two hours). I forgot about newbus. It
doesn't work, of course, and my C
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> After the recent signal related changes, the pre-cam kernel I saved a long
> time ago no longer works with (even statically compiled) user applications,
> which meant I had no way to access my files on an old disk hanging off an
> aic6360 card. So I decide
> I suspect someone will want a PCCARD front end as well. I'll write it if
> someone will work with me on testing.
You have a guinie pig^W^Wtester.
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> After the recent signal related changes, the pre-cam kernel I saved a long
> time ago no longer works with (even statically compiled) user applications,
> which meant I had no way to access my files on an old disk hanging off an
> aic6360 card. So I decide
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> DMA is not supported, sync transfer is supported but not tested, neither
> pnp nor pccard is supported. My card doesn't support any of these, so
> there's not much I could do, I hope sopme of you could fill in the blanks.
Looks pretty good. I'll whip up a
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 11:29:09AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:28:47PM -0800, Brian Beattie wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > The aic driver will likely oneday be ported. However, no one has come
> > > forward to do it. It is a highly desirable dr
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:28:47PM -0800, Brian Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > The aic driver will likely oneday be ported. However, no one has come
> > forward to do it. It is a highly desirable driver to have (even if
>
> Umm, I'm still working on the aic drive
In article <99040212091200.24...@camel.avias.com>,
Ilya Naumov wrote:
> how ironic - older 2.2.x do support it, but newer 3.1/4.0 does not.
What is ironic about that? Old OS versions support old hardware,
and new OS versions support new hardware. It makes perfect sense to
me.
John "My Sun 3/
th , 01 ÁÐÒ 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > Granted, we don't have a driver for that controller either, but the
> > programming manual is readily available from LSI Logic. Seems to me that
> > NetBSD has a driver for it, based on a Linux driver. (Been a while since
> > I looked into it, so I m
Steven Plite wrote:
>
> > But there are *no* alternatives for notebooks, except parallel port
> > SCSI.
>
> This isn't true. The 3.0 version of Newtek's Bus Toaster uses a Symbios
> 53C500 chip. I think Newtek still makes them...
I meant that there are no alternatives available in 3.x.
> Gran
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 11:55:23AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Brian Beattie wrote:
> >
> > > writing it would be a pain) because the only pccard scsi cards that are
> > > out there are aic-6[23]60 based.
> >
> > Not having a pcmcia slot or card, I am not sure about support for this.
>
> On
Brian Beattie wrote:
>
> > writing it would be a pain) because the only pccard scsi cards that are
> > out there are aic-6[23]60 based.
>
> Not having a pcmcia slot or card, I am not sure about support for this.
Once aic6[23]60 is working, the PCMCIA stuff is easily done.
> > However, the sad f
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> The aic driver will likely oneday be ported. However, no one has come
> forward to do it. It is a highly desirable driver to have (even if
Umm, I'm still working on the aic driver. Slowly, but working on it.
> writing it would be a pain) because the o
The aic driver will likely oneday be ported. However, no one has come
forward to do it. It is a highly desirable driver to have (even if
writing it would be a pain) because the only pccard scsi cards that are
out there are aic-6[23]60 based.
However, the sad fact is that the development is less
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:34:08 +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
> Is it doomed forever?
Grrr, I think the whole reason it was removed was to avoid questions
like this. ;-)
The removed aic driver is not under active development, and there are no
plans to revive it in the foreseeable future.
See? :-)
C
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 17:28:06 +0400, Ilya Naumov wrote:
>
> > i wonder what is the situation with AIC driver now? we're suffering
> > without it :)
>
> All traces of it have been completely removed from CURRENT.
>
> You should follow your cvs m
On Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 08:27:36PM +, Dan Moschuk wrote:
>
> Any hope of the aic driver gracing -current anytime soon? I'm really itching
> to port my burning software over.
No one ever bothered to port the aic driver to the new CAM
interface in 3.0 and 4.0. Since I know you're capable of it
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
>
> > At the moment, looking in LINT, it looks like aic still isn't
> > supported. Is that true? Does anyone know whether it will be?
>
> It's true that it isn't supported yet. We are planning on supporting it.
> Brian Beattie is the one working on it, you should probab
> I'd love to see the aic supported, mostly for my notebook. However,
> no one seems to have a confluance of time, information and talent to
> write the driver, or even port the other one in all its gory.
If CAMed aic driver is available, SlimSCSI support is very
easy. First of all, we need CAMed
In message <199901190613.paa06...@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> NAKAGAWA
Yoshihisa writes:
: Adaptec SlimSCSI is major PC-Card SCSI-IF, it is based on
: aic6360. Now, aic not supported yet, so Note-PC user can't use any
: PC-Card SCSI-IF.
I'd love to see the aic supported, mostly for my notebo
> If you want SCSI support any time soon, I would suggest getting a supported
> card. An ISA Advansys card might be a good, cheap substitute for your
> 6360/6260 board.
Adaptec SlimSCSI is major PC-Card SCSI-IF, it is based on
aic6360. Now, aic not supported yet, so Note-PC user can't use any
PC
Peter Mutsaers wrote...
> Hello,
>
> When CAM was integrated someone reported that the aic driver was not
> ready yet for CAM, but that "Brian Beattie is
> working on it".
Right.
> At the moment, looking in LINT, it looks like aic still isn't
> supported. Is that true? Does anyone know whether
44 matches
Mail list logo
