Re: MFC question

2016-01-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
why can't you provide both in stable/10 ? -a On 13 January 2016 at 16:03, Allan Jude wrote: > I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782 > > It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c) > wit

MFC question

2016-01-13 Thread Allan Jude
I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782 It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c) with cperciva@'s version from libmd. In benchmarks it was 5-30% faster, on x86_64 and arm/mips. But, in head