why can't you provide both in stable/10 ?
-a
On 13 January 2016 at 16:03, Allan Jude wrote:
> I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10:
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782
>
> It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c)
> wit
I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782
It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c)
with cperciva@'s version from libmd. In benchmarks it was 5-30% faster,
on x86_64 and arm/mips.
But, in head