Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-21 Thread Brent Verner
[2002-11-18 11:39] Alfred Perlstein said: | * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 11:06] wrote: | > I've just turned witness back on on the bento cluster, and got the | > following lock order reversals a number of times overnight: | > | > Nov 18 07:45:40 gohan11 kernel: 1st 0xc6887200 pipe

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-16 Thread Brent Verner
[2002-12-04 15:12] Alfred Perlstein said: | * Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021204 15:04] wrote: | > | > FYI, just got a similar one yesterday on an up-to-date -current: | > | > lock order reversal | > 1st 0xc784d700 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465 | > 2nd 0xc05138

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-05 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Dec-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021204 15:04] wrote: >> >> FYI, just got a similar one yesterday on an up-to-date -current: >> >> lock order reversal >> 1st 0xc784d700 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465 >> 2nd 0xc0513840 sigio

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-04 Thread Lars Eggert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Lars Eggert [021204 15:04] wrote: >FYI, just got a similar one yesterday on an up-to-date -current: > >lock order reversal > 1st 0xc784d700 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465 > 2nd 0xc0513840 sigio lock (sigio lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_si

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-04 Thread Lars Eggert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Lars Eggert [021204 15:04] wrote: >FYI, just got a similar one yesterday on an up-to-date -current: > >lock order reversal > 1st 0xc784d700 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465 > 2nd 0xc0513840 sigio lock (sigio lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_si

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021204 15:04] wrote: > > FYI, just got a similar one yesterday on an up-to-date -current: > > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc784d700 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465 > 2nd 0xc0513840 sigio lock (sigio lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sig.

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-12-04 Thread Lars Eggert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Kris Kennaway [021118 11:06] wrote: >I've just turned witness back on on the bento cluster, and got the >following lock order reversals a number of times overnight: > >Nov 18 07:45:40 gohan11 kernel: 1st 0xc6887200 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /local0/src-client/sys/ker

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:18:08PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 12:01] wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > I'm still

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Nov-2002 John Baldwin wrote: > > On 18-Nov-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 12:01] wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> >>> > Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits. >>> >>> Thanks. >>>

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Nov-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 12:01] wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> >> > Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits. >> >> Thanks. >> >> > I'm still in a holding pattern about addin

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 12:01] wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits. > > Thanks. > > > I'm still in a holding pattern about adding more debugging info to > > lockd now that we're

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits. Thanks. > I'm still in a holding pattern about adding more debugging info to > lockd now that we're in release candidate mode. I may ask for a > branch to be done, but i'm

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 11:06] wrote: > I've just turned witness back on on the bento cluster, and got the > following lock order reversals a number of times overnight: > > Nov 18 07:45:40 gohan11 kernel: 1st 0xc6887200 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ >/local0/src-client/sys/kern/s

Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c and kern_sig.c

2002-11-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
I've just turned witness back on on the bento cluster, and got the following lock order reversals a number of times overnight: Nov 18 07:45:40 gohan11 kernel: 1st 0xc6887200 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /local0/src-client/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465 Nov 18 07:45:40 gohan11 kernel: 2nd 0xc0447780 sigio

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 26-Mar-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020326 14:43] wrote: >> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote: >> > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track >> > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, i

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:43:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote: > > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track > > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the > > following lock order rev

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020326 14:43] wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote: > > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track > > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the > > following lock order reversal

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020324 14:26] wrote: > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the > following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight: > > Mar 24 07:31:44 gohan17 kernel: lock

Re: Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-24 Thread Kenneth Culver
On Sunday 24 March 2002 05:26 pm, you wrote: > The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track > down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the > following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight: > > Mar 24 07:31:44 gohan17 kernel: lock order reversal

Lock order reversals in sys_pipe.c

2002-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight: Mar 24 07:31:44 gohan17 kernel: lock order reversal Mar 24 07:31:44 gohan17 kernel: 1st 0xcf51aa80 pipe