On 18-Nov-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021118 12:01] wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> > Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> > I'm still in a holding pattern about adding more debugging info to
>> > lockd now that we're in release candidate mode. I may ask for a
>> > branch to be done, but i'm not sure yet.
>>
>> Feel free to give me non-committed patches to test :-)
>
> GRR, witless always gives me the locations of the correct lock
> order, never the locations of the incorrect ones, so here, try this
> and give me a backtrace, it should nail you with extreme prejudice
> when you get what i think is the wrong order:
This is why there is a static lock-order list that you can add to.
For example:
Index: subr_witness.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/kern/subr_witness.c,v
retrieving revision 1.130
diff -u -r1.130 subr_witness.c
--- subr_witness.c 11 Nov 2002 16:36:20 -0000 1.130
+++ subr_witness.c 18 Nov 2002 20:42:35 -0000
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@
{ "uidinfo hash", &lock_class_mtx_sleep },
{ "uidinfo struct", &lock_class_mtx_sleep },
{ NULL, NULL },
+ { "sigio lock", &lock_class_mtx_sleep },
+ { "pipe mutex", &lock_class_mtx_sleep },
+ { NULL, NULL },
/*
* spin locks
*/
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
