Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-18 Thread Mike Smith
> (In general, I don't think I like putting the hints in a separate > place or even a separate file... now I have two or three files I have > to deal with rather then one config file. It makes managing bunches > of config files annoying. I wish that the earlier format hadn't been

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-18 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > ... > It looks like sccnattach() is calling scvidprobe() and scvidprobe() > is then: > > 0xc023484b : cmpl $0x0,0x10(%ebp) > 0xc023484f : setne %al > 0xc0234852 : movzbl %al,%eax > 0xc0234855 : push %eax > 0xc0234856 :

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> My test box, with a pristine 5.x kernel, crashes on boot... it only :> gets a few lines in, prints the amount of memory the machine has, :> and BEWM. Low memory page fault. : :I saw the same thing myself. It turns out, though, that I was using : :COPTFLAGS= -march=pentium -Os -pi

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Wes Morgan
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Donn Miller wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > My test box, with a pristine 5.x kernel, crashes on boot... it only > > gets a few lines in, prints the amount of memory the machine has, > > and BEWM. Low memory page fault. > > I saw the sa

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Donn Miller
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > My test box, with a pristine 5.x kernel, crashes on boot... it only > gets a few lines in, prints the amount of memory the machine has, > and BEWM. Low memory page fault. I saw the same thing myself. It turns out, though, that I was usin

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :> Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' :> it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do :> argument parsing. :-] : :Yep, I ran it exactly as you specified in your "HEADS UP" message :to -current. It generates no output for eit

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> He seems to have put a new style GENERIC file (thus one that has no > hints = port irq etc information for ISA stuff) through the perl script. > > You might try the script on an old style GENERIC to get the hints.. That was indeed my problem - sorry for the false alarm, folks! I grabbed the GE

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
I copied GENERIC and GENERIC.hints to MYKERNEL and MYKERNEL.hints respective, and edit them to suit my system. In MYKERNEL, I changed a line of hints to hints "MYKERNEL.hints" and because my fe0's irq is 6, I modified MYKERNEL.hints hint.fe.0.irq="6" Is this ok? I never used *.pl sc

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Marc van Woerkom
> > GENERIC.hints is the corresponding hints file for what used to be > > in GENERIC. > > You might try the script on an old style GENERIC to get the hints.. Ignore that last remark. I did not note that you put in a GENERIC.hints in the tree. :) Better go to bed now.. Marc To Unsubscribe: sen

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Marc van Woerkom
bject: > Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box ** He seems to have put a new style GENERIC file (thus one that has no hints = port irq etc information for ISA stuff) through the perl script. You might try the script on an old style GEN

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Mark Murray
> On Friday, June 16, 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' > > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do > > argument parsing. :-] > >Couldn't have hurt to ask. > > while (defined($ARGV[0])) {

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Peter Wemm
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' > > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do > > argument parsing. :-] > > Yep, I ran it exactly as you specified in your "HEADS UP" message > to -current.

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-17 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' > > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do > > argument parsing. :-] > > Yep, I ran it exactly as you specified in your "HEADS UP" message > to -current

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Joseph Jacobson
>Chris Costello wrote: >> On Friday, June 16, 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: >> > Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' >> > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do >> > argument parsing. :-] >> >>Couldn't have hurt to ask. >>

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do > argument parsing. :-] Yep, I ran it exactly as you specified in your "HEADS UP" message to -current. It generates no output for either GENER

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> IMHO, the hints are a machine property, not a per-kernel property. Setting > up a /boot/device.hints is (IMHO) a one-time task that never needs to be > done more than once, and (again IMHO) the 'make install' had damn well > better not mess with. But what if one does not exist? Wouldn't it be

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Chris Costello
On Friday, June 16, 2000, Chris Costello wrote: > while (defined($arguments[0])) { > system("ls -l " . $arguments[0]); > shift @arguments; > } Actually, just for style purposes: for (; defined($arguments[0]); shift @arguments) { # ... pars

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Chris Costello
On Friday, June 16, 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > How about that and as a stdin pipe as well if no args are specified? Well, I don't know about modifying the argument vector in Perl (and I'd rather not find out how it behaves across various circumstances), but: #!/usr/bin/perl -w

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Peter Wemm
Chris Costello wrote: > On Friday, June 16, 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' > > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do > > argument parsing. :-] > >Couldn't have hurt to ask. > > while

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Chris Costello
On Friday, June 16, 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > Err.. how did you run it? 'perl < MYKERNEL'? If you run 'perl MYKERNEL' > it will generate nothing because I was kinda lame and didn't know how to do > argument parsing. :-] Couldn't have hurt to ask. while (defined($ARGV[0])) { # ... pa

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Peter Wemm
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Did you ran the Perl skript to create the hints file and > > then change your KERNEL config like this? > > Yep! The Perl script generates no output and my kernel config file > matches the requirements perfectly. Though, if you'll read the > subject line again, you

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Peter Wemm
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > > I tried booting a kernel this morning, just to see Peter's new > > "lean-n-mean" kernel config format in action, and I turned my > > workstation into a headless server in the process. :-) > > > > Most notably, these former entries we

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > I tried booting a kernel this morning, just to see Peter's new > "lean-n-mean" kernel config format in action, and I turned my > workstation into a headless server in the process. :-) > > Most notably, these former entries were now missing from my dmesg > output wh

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Did you ran the Perl skript to create the hints file and > then change your KERNEL config like this? Yep! The Perl script generates no output and my kernel config file matches the requirements perfectly. Though, if you'll read the subject line again, you'll see I used GENERIC for my test anyw

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Marc van Woerkom
> Most notably, these former entries were now missing from my dmesg > output when I logged in remotely and poked around: > > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem

Re: GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I had a wierder problem yesterday... I followed the new changes to the kernel config file, and included everything that belonged there, and yet for some reason, my kernel paniced while probing vga0 with an error number 6. I had to use a fixit floppy to get back into the system and compile a generi

GENERIC from today does not detect system console on my box

2000-06-16 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I tried booting a kernel this morning, just to see Peter's new "lean-n-mean" kernel config format in action, and I turned my workstation into a headless server in the process. :-) Most notably, these former entries were now missing from my dmesg output when I logged in remotely and poked around: