Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-08-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, July 26, 2010 10:43:59 am John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday, July 25, 2010 4:48:53 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > Reposting from -stable. > > > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > > break a few servers. > > > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8

Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, July 25, 2010 4:48:53 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > Reposting from -stable. > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > break a few servers. > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance > to test it. It is directly based off of ch

Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-26 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Jul-25 15:13:22 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: >On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 13:57 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> Very low-priority comment (I looked at the patch at the time it was >> posted to stable@). Nice thing about the patch is that it presumably >> identifies all the places that depend on the

Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-25 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 13:57 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > Reposting from -stable. > > > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > > break a few servers. > > > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not s

Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-25 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 13:57 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > Reposting from -stable. > > > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > > break a few servers. > > > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not s

Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-25 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > Reposting from -stable. > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > break a few servers. > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance > to test it. It is directly based off

[patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-25 Thread Sean Bruno
Reposting from -stable. Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to break a few servers. This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree. I have compile