On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 13:57 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > Reposting from -stable. > > > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > > break a few servers. > > > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance > > to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the > > Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree. > > > > I have compile and boot tested this on my local machines, but I don't > > have 64 CPU machines to test upon. > > > > Sean > > > > Very low-priority comment (I looked at the patch at the time it was > posted to stable@). Nice thing about the patch is that it presumably > identifies all the places that depend on the wideness of the cpu > mask. Would it make sense to abstract the cpumask operations with > some macros to not repeat the search for the places when 64 will > be too narrow again ?
What do you mean? Can you give me a quick example? Sean _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
