resending, because I clearly have no clue.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 14:45 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > > Seriously, Warner?
> >
> > Yes, seriou
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 14:45 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > > Seriously, Warner?
> >
> > Yes, seriously. We are adults. Act accordingly.
> >
and
> thinking "we don't need their contributions anyway, so let's just mock
> them and move on."
I don't think so. I'm guessing I'm older and more set in my ways.
There are much better ways to communicate that in recent messages.
--
Dan Langille
d...@
Success.
Sorry for the noise which would have been reduced if I'd gotten my sysctl on
the right host.
Thank you all.
>
> Warner
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>>> On Dec 17, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>
oked at that code path yet, buy you can see if it's
> making it to passopen() with dtrace and checking its return value. I don't
> see anything in how we register the device, though, that would suggest
> filtering it in jails.
>
> Warner
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 3:37 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:52:12PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What suggestions do you have for where I should look next? I'm happy to
>> start installing various builds o
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 3:37 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
> wrote:
>
> On 17 Dec 2017, at 19:52, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> What suggestions do you have for where I should look next? I'm happy to
>> start installing various builds of FreeBSD in orde
#x27;/dev/pass7' - Operation not permitted
Here is the truss output of the command in question:
https://gist.github.com/dlangille/b80ee804b8080e1cbf5b5ab67f0bdabe
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-current@free
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:43:15 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wro
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:42 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 16:34:34 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
&g
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wro
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
&
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:09:57 -0500, Dan Langille wro
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>&
stuff \
> as a userspace (fuse) filesystem
> I'd hope it's much the same with BSD. Removing the standard interface would
> be \
> counterproductive overall
Can you answer that and I'll relay please?
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:09:57 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wro
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrot
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrot
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrot
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(
e MTIOCEXTLOCATE
> ioctl, and allows the user to change the logical position
> of the tape drive in a number of ways. (Partition,
> block number, file number, set mark number, end of data.)
> The immediate bit and the explicit address bits are
> impl
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 17:29:48 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wr
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 17:29:48 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have updated the patches.
>>>
>
changes are in there from about 5 days ago.
Having solved my server hardware issues, I'm now having issues with the
autochanger mechanism
of the tape library.
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have updated the patches.
>>
>> I have removed the XPT_DEV_ADVINFO changes from the patches to head, since
>> I c
eatures and subcommands.
>>
>> usr.bin/mt/mt.c:
>> Implement support for mt(1) subcommands that need to
>> use getopt(3) for their arguments.
>>
>> Implement a new 'mt status' command to replace the old
>> 'mt status&#
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 17:56:42 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrot
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(
sting it via Bacula.
disclosure: I'm the sysutils/bacula-* maintainer and a Bacula committer.
I'll let the other Bacula devs know about this. They deal with the hardware.
I work on PostgreSQL.
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
___
freeb
On 18 Oct 2003 at 16:24, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> --On Saturday, October 18, 2003 6:25 PM -0400 Dan Langille
> > Cherse
> Cheers? ^^
Yeah, that's what it should have been. I blame my anticipation of
the baseball game...
--
Dan Langille : http:/
able.
Cherse
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 18 Oct 2003 at 12:16, Scott M. Likens wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> Comments anyone?
Yes. Next time, don't bother posting.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
ersion of write() .
>
> Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.22 +2 -2 src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
gt; be able to set PTHREAD_LIBS=-lkse in /etc/make.conf
> and rebuild your ports. Until then, libmap.conf(5)
> is the easiest solution.
Oh, well, perhaps my answer isn't correct after all... :(
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
install
3 - to /etc/libmap.conf, add:
libc_r.so.5 libkse.so.1
libc_r.so libkse.so
run.
See also
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=libmap.conf&sektion=5&apropos
=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.1-RELEASE
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
_
gt; reset the maintainer to ports@)
>
> Done.
Pssst! Should we change the databases/mysql323-server maintainer
too?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cu
the list. I just looked them over.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
make
> 5) make install
There was a patch recently commited:
<http://www.freshports.org/databases/mysql323-
server/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d.org>
Thanks.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freeb
On 29 Aug 2003 at 11:07, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>>On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:38, Dan Langille wrote:
> >>>>On a 5.1-release box, I tried to install databases/mysql323-client
> >>>>and was told:
> >>>>
> >>>>configure: error: Y
On 29 Aug 2003 at 10:52, Paul Blazejowski wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:38, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On a 5.1-release box, I tried to install databases/mysql323-client
> > and was told:
> >
> > configure: error: Your compiler cannot convert a longlong value t
-3.23.57/config.log
is at <http://www.freebsddiary.org/tmp/config.log>
Any ideas?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any m
ll that.
> > This is not in combination with softupdates. That's next on the agenda.
>
> So, how much slower was it? ;-)
$ uname -a
FreeBSD cvsup.nz.freebsd.org 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0:
Thu Mar 8 01:24:24 NZDT 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/ZEKE i38
>'on' in current is just an experiment.
>
> I have been running vfs.vmiodirenable=1 on two STABLE boxes for the last
> week or so. Still no problems. Been doing massive cvsups and all that.
> This is not in combination with softupdates. That's next on the agend
On 28 Dec 2000, at 9:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> which are good candidates for people looking for a good and simple
> task to do for FreeBSD.
How do we know which are the "good and simple" ones?
--
Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/
F
On 25 Feb 00, at 16:22, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> AFAIK, the last commit was over 4 hours ago. I'd say try again.
>
> Should find out myself in the next half-hour or so.
my build world just finished. no errors.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking
blems. I can not
> understand this behaviour ... Please help.
libcrypto is being updated. You (and the rest of us) will just have to wait
until it's finished.
See also the thead titled "Re: yes, current is broke...".
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm lo
p in /usr/src/secure/lib.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work]
http://www.dvl-software.com/ | http://www.unixathome.org/
http://www.racingsystem.com/ | http
On 21 Feb 00, at 20:57, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 21 Feb 00, at 15:23, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> > Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > >
> > > binary installation:
> > > - before: user needs to install openssl port
> > > - now:user needs
On 21 Feb 00, at 15:23, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> >
> > binary installation:
> > - before: user needs to install openssl port
> > - now:user needs to install openssl package
>
> Where is the openssl package, and what it is
ink
calling it GUIDED will certainly reduce the number of calls for help.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work]
The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/
NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/
The Racing System - http://w
On 14 Feb 00, at 13:51, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Dan Langille wrote:
> > I have one box which is slow to boot under -current (mind you, I've never
> > run anything but -current on this box). In my previous message, there
> > were two excessively long pauses.
On 7 Feb 00, at 18:12, Dan Langille wrote:
> I have one box which is slow to boot under -current (mind you, I've never
> run anything but -current on this box). There are two pauses. One after
> ata0 appears and another after ata-isa0 appears.
I'm reposting this as there h
On 14 Feb 00, at 11:15, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 14 Feb 00, at 22:02, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 Feb 00, at 18:12, Dan Langille wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have one box which is slow to boot under -current (
On 14 Feb 00, at 22:02, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7 Feb 00, at 18:12, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > I have one box which is slow to boot under -current (mind you, I've never
> > run anything but -current on this box). There are two pauses. One after
> > ata0 appea
On 7 Feb 00, at 18:12, Dan Langille wrote:
> I have one box which is slow to boot under -current (mind you, I've never
> run anything but -current on this box). There are two pauses. One after
> ata0 appears and another after ata-isa0 appears.
I'm reposting this as there h
On 7 Feb 00, at 23:38, Dan Langille wrote:
> This 4.0-current box contains a 10/100 nic. This may sound strange,
> but I suspect this NIC is the cause of my problems, but I have no
> explanation as to why it. The above symptoms occur only when this
> box is running. The problem
led)
cs0: not probed (disabled)
sn0: not probed (disabled)
IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.
ad0: 1222MB [2484/16/63] at ata0-master
using WDMA2
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work]
The FreeBSD Diary -
t probed (disabled)
le0: not probed (disabled)
lnc0: not probed (disabled)
cs0: not probed (disabled)
sn0: not probed (disabled)
IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.
ad0: 1222MB [2484/16/63] at ata0-
master using WDMA2
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
--
Dan Langill
On 5 Feb 00, at 22:30, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > After a make -k -DNOFSCHG installworld and a make installworld, I'm
> > getting this:
> >
> > install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 genassym /usr/bin
> > ins
succesfully. You
> have install, libc, and libutil out of sync.
>
> I believe the correct procedure for installing everything in your case
> is:
>
> make -k -NOFSCHG installworld
> make installworld
>
> Jim Bloom
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Dan Langill
ect procedure for installing everything in your case
> is:
>
> make -k -NOFSCHG installworld
> make installworld
>
> Jim Bloom
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > [root@buff:/usr/src/sys/compile/BUFF] # make install
> > inst
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/BUFF.
# uname -a
FreeBSD buff.unixathome.org 4.0-2127-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-
2127-CURRENT #0: Thu Jan 27 15:14:24 GMT 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386
cvsup is about 15 hours old and make world was just done.
cheers.
On 6 Feb 00, at 14:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> I tried to swap network cards today. So I did a boot -c then went into
> visual config. After adding ed0 back in and modifying, then saving the
> values for it, I did a Q to quit and a Y to save. That was about 20
> minutes ago.
sssue? My last cvsup was about 18 hours ago.
On a side note, is there any documentation on kernel.conf? I want to
enable ed0, change the base address and IOMEM. Does anyone have
an example?
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work]
The FreeBSD Diary
On 5 Feb 00, at 16:35, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 08:47:19PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 5 Feb 00, at 9:28, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 07:41:56PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > > I'm experi
On 5 Feb 00, at 1:06, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Dan Langille" writes:
> : OK. I'll cvsup to be sure I have the latest. And try the whole process
> : again. FWIW: I'm following the instructions mentioned by Jim Bloom in
>
On 5 Feb 00, at 9:28, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 07:41:56PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> > I'm experiencing the same problems but the proposed solution of
> > "make -k -DNOFSCHG installworld " doesn't allow the following "make
--
> Ruslan ErmilovSysadmin and DBA of the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] United Commercial Bank,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]FreeBSD committer,
> +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine
>
> http://www.FreeBSD.orgThe Power To Serve
> http://www.orac
ed-stack-boundary=2
../../netinet/mlfk_ipl.c
../../netinet/mlfk_ipl.c:77: `ipl_inited' undeclared here (not in a function)
../../netinet/mlfk_ipl.c:77: initializer element is not constant
../../netinet/mlfk_ipl.c:77: (near initialization for
`sysctl___net_inet_ipf_ipl_inited.oid_arg1')
Please don't forget about us!
[using 2.2.8 and 3.1]
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/
NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/
The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm
To Unsubs
ething.
cvsup, when it was up, was an old 486. It's down now, but it should
return within the next few weeks.
Umm, well, actually, we're waiting for ncr to work under 3.* and then
we'll upgrade and deploy the box.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
The FreeBSD Diary
already examine FTP_PASSIVE_MODE, why not just set it to YES by
> default somewhere?
That makes more sense to me than introducing a new flag.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/
NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.
all, passive mode won't
bother you one bit.
For the argument that some ftp servers don't accept passive mode, I say
it's a question of numbers: which default setting will satisfy the
greatest number of people? which setting will reduce the number of
questions "how do I do X
on
At that point, I gave up.
cheers.
btw: this is the new NZ mirror I'm trying to set up. Mind you, we can
always run it on 2.2.8. But I'd prefer 3.1.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/
NZ FreeBSD User Group - http:/
75 matches
Mail list logo
