On Apr 10, 2025, at 15:36, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2025, at 10:14, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On Apr 10, 2025, at 09:25, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> The following data are from later in the builder seqeunce.
>>> Here I'm not looking at builder activity with large Elapsed
>>> multiplicat
> On Apr 9, 2025, at 1:01 AM, Robert Austen
> wrote:
>
> I respectfully disagree.
>
> PF_DEFAULT_TO_DROP has no effect if pfctl does not perform its ioctl call to
> enable itself, ie. to apply any hooks.
> if pfctl fails, then the hooks are left unhooked, and EVERYTHING defaults to
> PASS,
On Apr 10, 2025, at 10:14, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2025, at 09:25, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> The following data are from later in the builder seqeunce.
>> Here I'm not looking at builder activity with large Elapsed
>> multiplication factors for the build. It is more of a random
>> sampl
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 15:48:11 +0800
Zhenlei Huang wrote:
> > On Apr 9, 2025, at 1:01 AM, Robert Austen
> > wrote:
> >
> > I respectfully disagree.
> >
> > PF_DEFAULT_TO_DROP has no effect if pfctl does not perform its ioctl call
> > to enable itself, ie. to apply any hooks.
> > if pfctl fails,
On Apr 7, 2025, at 10:15, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2025, at 09:44, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On Apr 7, 2025, at 08:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon 07 Apr 08:07, Mark Millard wrote:
. . .
>>>
>>> Listing like this is clearly not any useful, the problem we have is the
>>
On Mon 07 Apr 15:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Baptiste Daroussin writes:
>
> > Listing like this is clearly not any useful, the problem we have is the
> > performance changes depending on what is happening in parallel on the
> > machines.
>
> Sounds like increased memory footprint t
On Apr 10, 2025, at 09:25, Mark Millard wrote:
> The following data are from later in the builder seqeunce.
> Here I'm not looking at builder activity with large Elapsed
> multiplication factors for the build. It is more of a random
> sampling showing examples of build-depends, lib-depends, and
>
The following data are from later in the builder seqeunce.
Here I'm not looking at builder activity with large Elapsed
multiplication factors for the build. It is more of a random
sampling showing examples of build-depends, lib-depends, and
run-depends and some with more than one of those notably
c
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 15:13, Sulev-Madis Silber
wrote:
>
> oh, i think WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER does it, it also turns
> WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP on. i might have overlooked what all those
> "compiler" options actually do. what i wanted is to exclude compilers from
> resulting build target.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
before updating your system please run fwget(8) or build
wifi-firmware-iwlwifi-kmod (or the appropriate flavor) from ports if you
are using iwlwifi(4) or iwx(4).
You can do it any time as the extra firmware files will do no harm until
your next reb
10 matches
Mail list logo
