Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:59:39PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2012-09-04 23:43, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >>I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on Fr

Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:59:39PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-09-04 23:43, Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD > >>10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1

Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-09-04 23:43, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. ... The benchmark is some

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-09-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-09-04 21:47:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-04 21:47:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [CFT] hwpmc support for Intel Ivy Bridge

2012-09-04 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:02:06PM +0200, Davide Italiano wrote: > [trimming old mails] > > > > > Hi, > > > > here are the results > > > > # pmccontrol -L > > SOFT > > CLOCK.STAT > > CLOCK.HARD > > LOCK.FAILED > > PAGE_FAULT.WRITE > > PAGE_FAULT.READ > >

Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD > 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against > clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. > > The attached text file[1] contains more information about

Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD > 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against > clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. > > The attached text file[1] contains more information abou

Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread O. Hartmann
On 09/04/12 22:39, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD > 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against > clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. > > The attached text file[1] contains more information about the tests,

Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-04 Thread Dimitry Andric
Hi all, I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. The attached text file[1] contains more information about the tests, some semi-cooked performance data, and my conclusions.

Re: [CFT] hwpmc support for Intel Ivy Bridge

2012-09-04 Thread Davide Italiano
[trimming old mails] > > Hi, > > here are the results > > # pmccontrol -L > SOFT > CLOCK.STAT > CLOCK.HARD > LOCK.FAILED > PAGE_FAULT.WRITE > PAGE_FAULT.READ > PAGE_FAULT.ALL > > # pmcstat -SOFF_CORE_RESPONSE_0,rsp=REQ_DMND_DATA_RD+RES_ANY -w1 -T > p

Re: [CFT] hwpmc support for Intel Ivy Bridge

2012-09-04 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote: > > Le 3 sept. 2012 à 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >> Find a patch that add Intel Ivy Bridge support to hwpmc(9). > >> The patch also sup

Re: [patch] mmap() MAP_TEXT implementation (to use for shared libraries)

2012-09-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:00:39 am Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >>

Re: recent update seems to break portupgrade

2012-09-04 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/3/2012 10:45 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > These errors are a problem with bsd.port.mk. I've been meaning to write > up a patch for a while now and get to bapt for testing. If he doesn't > get to it first, I'll get one submitted soon. I've filed ports/171326 to address. The warnings are harmles

machdep.hyperthreading_allowed does not affect SMT cores

2012-09-04 Thread Ryan Stone
I have a Intel Sandy Bridge system that reports that it has SMT cores instead of HTT(under a derivative of FreeBSD 8.2). I'll admit that I don't at all understand the distinction between the two -- I thought that HTT was just Intel's name for SMT. In any case, is there any reason that machdep.hyp

Re: [PATCH] Add locking to ahb(4)

2012-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
I have a full EISA system and a dozen of these cards, and other EISA cards, if anybody wants to take up tilting at that windmill. I'm in Denver CO, and will drive it to your house, within reason. The system is a dual CPU 533MHz Digital system with all the config disks, etc, you need to support

Re: [CFT] hwpmc support for Intel Ivy Bridge

2012-09-04 Thread Davide Italiano
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Fabien Thomas wrote: > > Le 3 sept. 2012 à 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > >> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Find a patch that add Intel Ivy Bridge support to hwpmc(9). >>> The patch also support offcore RS

Re: recent update seems to break portupgrade

2012-09-04 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:14:42AM -0400, AN wrote: > FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #18 r240078: Mon Sep 3 > 17:41:46 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 > > # cat /etc/make.conf > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 > QT4_OPTIONS= QGTKSTYLE > > # added by

Re: [patch] mmap() MAP_TEXT implementation (to use for shared libraries)

2012-09-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I found out that while the running excecutables and a dynamic linker > >> are p

Re: [patch] mmap() MAP_TEXT implementation (to use for shared libraries)

2012-09-04 Thread Svatopluk Kraus
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I found out that while the running excecutables and a dynamic linker >> are protected against writing (ETXTBSY), the loaded shared libraries >> are not prote

Re: [CFT] hwpmc support for Intel Ivy Bridge

2012-09-04 Thread Fabien Thomas
Le 3 sept. 2012 à 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Find a patch that add Intel Ivy Bridge support to hwpmc(9). >> The patch also support offcore RSP token for Sandy Bridge. >> Note: No uncore support. >> >> T