On 2012-09-04 23:43, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD
10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against
clang 3.1 and clang 3.2.
...
The benchmark is somewhat meaningless if one does not
know the options that were used during the testing.
If you meant the compilation options, those were simply the FreeBSD
defaults for all tested programs, e.g. "-O2 -pipe", except for boost,
which uses "-ftemplate-depth-128 -O3 -finline-functions". I will add
some explicit notes about them.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
