On 11/7/2011 2:57 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
On 11/7/2011 10:24 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Unlikely; the inp is properly locked there and the udp info attach
better still be valid there; your problem is most likely elsewhere;
try to see if you have other threads and see what they do at the same
tim
On 11/7/2011 10:24 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Unlikely; the inp is properly locked there and the udp info attach
better still be valid there; your problem is most likely elsewhere;
try to see if you have other threads and see what they do at the same
time, etc. You would need to race with udp_det
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
>> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kbi" or "KBI". In other words, something
>> that hints at the function's
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:47:59AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
> >> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kbi
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
>> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kbi" or "KBI". In other words, something
>> that hints at the function's rea
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> I'm unsure if this replies to your concerns because you just criticize
>> without making a real technical question in this post.
>>
> I made comments on 3 points:
> - using internal
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kbi" or "KBI". In other words, something
> that hints at the function's reason for existing.
Sure. Below is the extraction of only vm_
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> [restored cc: to the original poster]
>
> on 02/11/2011 08:10 Benjamin Kaduk said the following:
>> I am perhaps confused. Last I checked, bsd.kmod.mk caused '-include
>> opt_global.h' to be passed on the command line. Is the issue jus
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>
>>> Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_t merge is done.
>>> Again, I
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:29 -0800, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 11/07/11 11:20, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > I noted that we no longer have the disc1.iso in this release. What
> > should I use to populate a NFS rootfs for netinstalls?
> >
> > This was what I had been using(8.2-RELEASE) to populate NFS ro
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>
>
> 2011/11/7 Garrett Cooper
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> > On 2011-Nov-06 17:41:49 +0200, Alexander Yerenkow
>> > wrote:
>> >> And problem compiling kernel for amd64 arch.
>> >>
>> >> I attached full log
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi Gang,
We are seeing repeatable panics under high PPS load on our production
systems. It happens when the traffic gets into the range or 200MBps and
150-200K PPS. We have been managed to track it down to the following piece of
code:
(gdb) l *udp_i
On 11/07/11 11:20, Sean Bruno wrote:
I noted that we no longer have the disc1.iso in this release. What
should I use to populate a NFS rootfs for netinstalls?
This was what I had been using(8.2-RELEASE) to populate NFS roots for
netinstalls. This allowed you to boot up into something that was
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:46 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> On all of my used FreeBSD 9.0-RCX and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT boxes (all
> amd64 and CLANG compiled), I do not have a graphical user interface in
> VLC anymore. Instead, calling vlc most recent 1.1.11), I get this error:
>
> VLC media player 1.1.11
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Gary Jennejohn
wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:46:28 +0100
> "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
>> On all of my used FreeBSD 9.0-RCX and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT boxes (all
>> amd64 and CLANG compiled), I do not have a graphical user interface in
>> VLC anymore. Instead, calling v
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I noted that we no longer have the disc1.iso in this release. What
> should I use to populate a NFS rootfs for netinstalls?
>
> This was what I had been using(8.2-RELEASE) to populate NFS roots for
> netinstalls. This allowed you to boot up int
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:46:28 +0100
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
> On all of my used FreeBSD 9.0-RCX and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT boxes (all
> amd64 and CLANG compiled), I do not have a graphical user interface in
> VLC anymore. Instead, calling vlc most recent 1.1.11), I get this error:
>
> VLC media player
On 11/06/2011 06:43, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/05/2011 10:15, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 07:37:48AM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Kostik Belousov
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06
Panic screenshot is here:
http://sobomax.sippysoft.com/ScreenShot859.png
-Maxim
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd
I noted that we no longer have the disc1.iso in this release. What
should I use to populate a NFS rootfs for netinstalls?
This was what I had been using(8.2-RELEASE) to populate NFS roots for
netinstalls. This allowed you to boot up into something that was
self-contained.
The other ISO's seem t
Hi Gang,
We are seeing repeatable panics under high PPS load on our production
systems. It happens when the traffic gets into the range or 200MBps and
150-200K PPS. We have been managed to track it down to the following
piece of code:
(gdb) l *udp_input+0x5d2
0x806f6202 is in udp_inp
Thank you for your work. I will give it a try in stable/9. I have
another two PR:
kern/160307 and bin/160275 that maybe you can help;
the reason of bin/160275 is complicated, but the fix for kernel crash
caused by module without ctf section(for example, nvidia.ko) missed
somthing
(my mistake)
i
On all of my used FreeBSD 9.0-RCX and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT boxes (all
amd64 and CLANG compiled), I do not have a graphical user interface in
VLC anymore. Instead, calling vlc most recent 1.1.11), I get this error:
VLC media player 1.1.11 The Luggage (revision exported)
Blocked: call to unsetenv("D
2011/11/7 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>
>>> Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_t merge is done.
>>> Again, I did not spent time converti
2011/11/7 Garrett Cooper
> On Nov 6, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> > On 2011-Nov-06 17:41:49 +0200, Alexander Yerenkow
> wrote:
> >> And problem compiling kernel for amd64 arch.
> >>
> >> I attached full log:
> >>
> >> http://www.box.net/shared/juajg1o2lg1mxbht5x9b
> >
> > It looks
2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>
>> Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_t merge is done.
>> Again, I did not spent time converting all in-tree consumers
>> from
On Nov 6, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2011-Nov-06 17:41:49 +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>> And problem compiling kernel for amd64 arch.
>>
>> I attached full log:
>>
>> http://www.box.net/shared/juajg1o2lg1mxbht5x9b
>
> It looks like you did a parallel - in which case the a
On 2011-Nov-06 17:41:49 +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>And problem compiling kernel for amd64 arch.
>
>I attached full log:
>
>http://www.box.net/shared/juajg1o2lg1mxbht5x9b
It looks like you did a parallel - in which case the actual error is
buried somewhere in that output. Please repeat wit
28 matches
Mail list logo
