Hi, On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao <atti...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I'm unsure if this replies to your concerns because you just criticize >> without making a real technical question in this post. >> > I made comments on 3 points: > - using internal implementation details of mutex(9) is broken > - LOCK_FILE/LOCK_LINE are broken (a bit of a divergence on the > original subject :/) > - there is _no_ reason not to use inlines function for such trivial oneliners > ok, I read the original thread, now that I understand the purpose of the patch. It would make the third comment irrelevant, but I still do not agree about the reason of the patch.
- ARnaud _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
