Re: X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-13 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:14, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > > I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix > > some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see > > release schedules pushed

Re: X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix > > some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see > > release schedules pushed back because these problems are

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol"__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Makoto Matsushita wrote: > carl> 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it > carl> is not a one size fits all period of time). > > You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at > least, full 1 day or more), and it is not helpful for ordinal users, > not y

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol"__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Makoto Matsushita wrote: > tlambert2> fetch -o - URL | gunzip > unzipped_image > > You fully forgot that all users use FreeBSD. I can tell you how to do the same thing in Windows, using "helper" applications with Netscape (winzip), if you need it. The FTP command I gave works on Linux, AIX

Is this a tool problem or source?

2002-10-13 Thread Julian Elischer
ref3# make linking kernel.debug ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3. ref3# having done a new cvsup and a new config.. UPDATING has nothing relevant that I can see. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsub

Re: X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-13 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > > I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix > > some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see > > release schedules pushed back bec

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Carl Schmidt
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:45:41PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > carl> 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it > carl> is not a one size fits all period of time). > > You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at > least, full 1 day or more), and it

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Makoto Matsushita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-13 ] [ Subjecte: Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF") ] > > carl> 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it > carl> is not a one size fits all period of time). > > You forget

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Carl Schmidt
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:40:20PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:29:32PM -0400, Carl Schmidt wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:43:20AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > > tlambert2> That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, > > > tlambert2> over

Re: X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: > I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix > some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see > release schedules pushed back because these problems are lost in the > noise, and I c

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol"__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Makoto Matsushita
carl> 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it carl> is not a one size fits all period of time). You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at least, full 1 day or more), and it is not helpful for ordinal users, not you. Again, reducing hours/percentag

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol"__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Makoto Matsushita
tlambert2> fetch -o - URL | gunzip > unzipped_image You fully forgot that all users use FreeBSD. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:29:32PM -0400, Carl Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:43:20AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > tlambert2> That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, > > tlambert2> overall... a 14% reduction in size. > > > > The percentage doesn't matter. If I

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Carl Schmidt
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:43:20AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > tlambert2> That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, > tlambert2> overall... a 14% reduction in size. > > The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image is compressed, user who > downloads the image may de-compress t

X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE?

2002-10-13 Thread Wesley Morgan
The last tentative date for 5.0-RELEASE I have seen is "late November, early December"... This does seem odd since I haven't seen a DP2, but... Quite a few people seem to be having serious problems with XFree86 for 3-4 weeks, everything from sig 6's, the "bezier" crashes, to strange freezes that s

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol"__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Makoto Matsushita wrote: > tlambert2> That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, > tlambert2> overall... a 14% reduction in size. > > The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image is compressed, user who > downloads the image may de-compress that image to burn (I don't know > any abou

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol"__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Makoto Matsushita
tlambert2> That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, tlambert2> overall... a 14% reduction in size. The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image is compressed, user who downloads the image may de-compress that image to burn (I don't know any about the burner softwares which support

Re: Still under -current: bwrite: buffer is not busy???

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:42:52AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy??? > panic messages: > --- > panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: cd36f000 FYI, the above line is the real panic message..the bwrite panic is secondary and occurs when trying to sy

Re: cheap power-pc platform on eBay...

2002-10-13 Thread Peter Grehan
> Please be realistic and search the "just ended" acutions to see what the > current market prices are: Expand your search to 'apple g3 desktop', which will pick up the beige desktops. Selective quoting here for sure, but bargains are available to those who go searching. Mabye the price is being

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Compression gets rid of about 36MB. > > How long did that take to compress though? 2 minutes on a P3-800 with 128M of RAM and one IDE disk. Doesn't matter, because all it really adds is latency. > What load did the machine that did the compression have? Currently,

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew Dillon wrote: > :% ls -l > :248643584 Sep 17 00:03 5.0-CURRENT-20020917-JPSNAP.iso > :212988130 Oct 13 10:39 5.0-CURRENT-20020917-JPSNAP.iso.gz > : > :Compression gets rid of about 36MB. > : > :That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, overall... > :a 14% reduction in size. >

Re: GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread walt
BOUWSMA Beery wrote: > ...That is, your kernel can mount the NetBSD partitions with their 16 > partitions within, even if `disklabel' doesn't work yet... Heh, I just mounted the NBSD partition using an un-patched FBSD kernel with GEOM, even though disklabel (recompiled) refuses to list it. Here'

Re: cheap power-pc platform on eBay...

2002-10-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:25:00AM +1000, Peter Grehan wrote: > > Where are you finding "Beige" G3's for $35?? I quick eBay search showed > > the price to be more in the $200 - $300 price range. > > That's way too expensive. Search for "apple beige g3". There's one at > $41 if you can get hol

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Still under -current: bwrite: buffer is not busy???

2002-10-13 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, I still get the following panic (2 are attached) under -current on my notebook when doing a 'portupgrade -R -f kdebase'. Anyone else sees this? ### crash1 ### GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Publi

Re: GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread BOUWSMA Beery
[IPv6-only address above; strip the obvious for IPv4-only mail] > > We never had to ability to do this before. GEOM can probably do it for > > you, with something like this patch: > > Oops. Now I get the same error with both kinds of partitions: > > disklabel: ioctl DIOCGDINFO: Operation not

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-13 14:49, Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > That's a commonly asked question, and a very good answer is in the FAQ :P > > There are good reasons why the overworked snapshot servers do not > > attempt to compress the ISO images, which btw contain mos

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> On 2002-10-13 13:36, Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :> > I had upgraded the machine with a snapshot from the Japan snapshot :> > image server; apparently, no one ever thinks of compressiong ISO's, :> > so that was at the limit of what I could download. 8-(. :> > :> > It may be a goo

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-10-13 13:36, Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had upgraded the machine with a snapshot from the Japan snapshot > > image server; apparently, no one ever thinks of compressiong ISO's, > > so that was at the limit of what I could download. 8-(. > > >

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Charlie Root
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: coredumps with ex(1)

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:12AM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: > Ditto. Same caveats as well. Actually, the easiest way for you to reproduce it would probably be to install the security/fuzz port and run it against ex: fuzz -u nobody ex It crashes ex pretty easily. I

Re: cheap power-pc platform on eBay...

2002-10-13 Thread Peter Grehan
> Where are you finding "Beige" G3's for $35?? I quick eBay search showed > the price to be more in the $200 - $300 price range. That's way too expensive. Search for "apple beige g3". There's one at $41 if you can get hold of a keyboard/mouse: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-13 13:36, Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had upgraded the machine with a snapshot from the Japan snapshot > image server; apparently, no one ever thinks of compressiong ISO's, > so that was at the limit of what I could download. 8-(. > > It may be a good idea to put this

Re: current unable to exec processes under load

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Kris Kennaway: > > load: 0.00 cmd: tcsh 8403 [inode] 0.01u 0.00s 0% 1076k > > The dreaded "inode" problem. I've been seeing this from time to time where the > system will be blocked for all I/O on a given disk with all processes waiting > on "inode". > > Ge

Re: Yet another new preventer of cross-builds

2002-10-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-11 15:22, Andre Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That looks like the same error message I've been getting going from > 4.6 to 4.7. I have one machine that went to through the build fine. > But the machine that I'm working on now dies at the make buildworld > with the same type message.

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-13 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-13 ] [ Subjecte: Quickcam ] > I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB port. > What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support? I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel at on

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Peter Wemm wrote: > Add COMPAT4X=true to your make.conf. We added __stdoutp etc to RELENG_4 > and included it in the last two releases. -current's COMPAT4X stuff > has the updated libc.so.4 with these symbols. > > If you want to run 4.x binaries, you need COMPAT4X=true so that we can > update t

Quickcam

2002-10-13 Thread John Angelmo
I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB port. What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support? But there dosn't seem to be any luck for me? http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/160/2002/2/0/7924294/ /John To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsu

Re: GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread walt
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes: > >>Poul-Henning et al, >> >>recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the >>following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without >>GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. M

Re: cheap power-pc platform on eBay...

2002-10-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 08:48:15PM +1000, Peter Grehan wrote: > > There are quite a number of these gadgets on eBay right now, they would > > probably make a cheap entry-level platform for powerpc work: > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2059912083 > > For the budget-consciou

Re: current unable to exec processes under load

2002-10-13 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Kris Kennaway: > load: 0.00 cmd: tcsh 8403 [inode] 0.01u 0.00s 0% 1076k The dreaded "inode" problem. I've been seeing this from time to time where the system will be blocked for all I/O on a given disk with all processes waiting on "inode". Generally updating the system to a more r

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Peter Wemm
Terry Lambert wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > If you can't deal with having to recompile things over the -current > > > > development cycle then don't run it. > > > > > > Uh, the issue was the upco

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Charlie Root
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > If you can't deal with having to recompile things over the -current > > > development cycle then don't run it. > > > > Uh, the issue was the upcoming 5.0 release, which will cause

Re: GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes: >On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >In file included from /src/current/sys/geom/geom_bsd.c:62: >/src/current/sys/sys/disklabel.h:174: size of array `__assert174' is negative >*** Error code 1 > >because of

Re: GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: # In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes: # >Poul-Henning et al, # > # >recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the # >following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Peter Wemm
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 01:38:12AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > >=20 > > > Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-b= > ased > > > current to a -current as of yesterday,

Re: Bug unmounting readonly NTFS partitions uncovered by GEOM

2002-10-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
done. In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Peter Edwards" writes: >ntfs_unmount has had this bug since v 1.1: there's a "ronly" variable that >should be used to detect if the mount is read-only and affect the flags >passed to the VOP_CLOSE of the device vnode accordingly. It's never set to >anything

Bug unmounting readonly NTFS partitions uncovered by GEOM

2002-10-13 Thread Peter Edwards
ntfs_unmount has had this bug since v 1.1: there's a "ronly" variable that should be used to detect if the mount is read-only and affect the flags passed to the VOP_CLOSE of the device vnode accordingly. It's never set to anything other than zero, but the matching VOP_OPEN in ntfs_mount() gets it

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:32:14PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > Actually, this should only be requir

Re: GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes: >Poul-Henning et al, > >recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the >following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without >GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is from Oct 12 and the k

GEOM and NetBSD partitions/disklabels

2002-10-13 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
Poul-Henning et al, recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is from Oct 12 and the kernel derived from GENERIC, plus/minus devices/options to match

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Charlie Root
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: alpha can't cross-compile i386

2002-10-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
The situation did not change during the last two months, even with the latest GCC imports. beast.FreeBSD.org still blows up attempting to build world and kernel for i386: : -- : >>> stage 4: building everything.. : -

Re: coredumps with ex(1)

2002-10-13 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Ditto. Same caveats as well. -- Eric Brunner-Williams wampumpeag, llc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: coredumps with ex(1)

2002-10-13 Thread Keith Bostic
> I'm able to cause ex to null pointer deref with random (garbage) > input..is anyone interested in the tracebacks? Sure, I would be -- although the input is more interesting to me than the stack trace. I won't do anything with it immediately, though. Regards, --keith =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Mega Tr0n
nm looks like it was just fixed. I'll give it another whirl :) sorry On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 03:56, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > -- > >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > --

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Mega Tr0n
I got the same error on my laptop after cvsuping today. Been reluctant to after all the talk of recompiles and the kde stability problems, but gave in after trying to install a port and remembering they switched it back to tgz On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 03:56, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > -

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some > > > > date which I don't know off-hand)

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: imake-4 build broken

2002-10-13 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:31:52PM -0400, Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't really understand how this is happening. The uses of NSIG are > > > also conditionalized. If _POSIX_SOURCE is defined, line 46 should not > > > be visible. What rev is your /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some > > > date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild > > > everything though. > > > > Th

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some > > date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild > > everything though. > > This would be OK, if the X11 package

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Vincent Poy
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some > > date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild > > everything though. > > This would be OK, if the X11 package came from the FreeBS

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: > Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some > date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild > everything though. This would be OK, if the X11 package came from the FreeBSD source tree, instead of just as a binary on the CDRO

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: HEADS UP: Port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based > > current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs > > running on that machine i got an error message lik

Re: cheap power-pc platform on eBay...

2002-10-13 Thread Peter Grehan
> There are quite a number of these gadgets on eBay right now, they would > probably make a cheap entry-level platform for powerpc work: > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2059912083 For the budget-conscious developer, I'd recommend the Apple 'Beige' G3. Not much more expensive

Re: current unable to exec processes under load

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:12:43AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > Can you back out my scheduler changes just to be sure? I can not foresee > any way that they could cause this, but I'd like to be certain. Blocking > on inode usually indicates a vfs deadlock. Can you break into ddb and > type 'sh

Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 01:38:12AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > > > Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based > > current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs > > run

HEADS UP: Port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF")

2002-10-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based > current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs > running on that machine i got an error message like Peter removed the stdio

Unknown symbol "__sF"

2002-10-13 Thread Hellmuth Michaelis
Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs running on that machine i got an error message like /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: . Unknown symbol "__sF" which somehow came from this ancient library

Re: panic during boot

2002-10-13 Thread Alex Varju
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:21:01PM -0700, Alex Varju wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > For the last few days, I have been unable to build a bootable kernel. I > > have gone back to GENERIC, and it still doesn't work. When I try to boot, > > it panics almost im