Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >I don't know how GEOM handles disk labels, though we've heard a lot >about changes. It's possible that this code is now completely >redundant. It's preparing to write at offset 8 sectors and on from >the beginning of the partition;

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Dowse writes: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robe >rt Watson writes: >>However, here's a patch that makes Vinum use namei() to rely on devfs to >>locate requested devices instead of parsing the device name and guessing >>the device number (incorrectly with GEO

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes: > >--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes: >>=

Re: signal 6 to XFree86 (Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools...)

[Moved to -current] > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:30:09PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: > > Wesley Morgan wrote: > > >I had one today, they have decreased significantly since removing the > > >Type1 module from my server configuration. > > > > I've also found that disabling xscreensav

i386 tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: laptop panicked [with trace]

> * De: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-02 ] > [ Subjecte: laptop panicked [with trace] ] > > With today's -current. No X11, two ttyv0 in use -- cvs updating, the > > other -- playing hack(6): > > This is known; A temporary fix is to modify the part dereferencing > p->p_l

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Saturday, 5 October 2002 at 4:08:19 +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: > > [CCs trimmed] > >> The divide by zero problem seems to be caused by an interaction >> between two bugs: GEOM refuses to return the sector size because > ... >> The next failure I get is: >> >> Can't write config to /dev/da1s

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > >The divide by zero problem seems to be caused by an interaction > >between two bugs: GEOM refuses to return the sector size because > ... > >The next failure I get is: > > > > Can't write config to /dev/da1s1d, error 45 (EOPNOTSUPP) > > This turns out

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Saturday, 5 October 2002 at 4:08:19 +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: > > [CCs trimmed] > >> The divide by zero problem seems to be caused by an interaction >> between two bugs: GEOM refuses to return the sector size because > ... >> The next failure I get is: >> >> Can't write config to /dev/da1s

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > >The divide by zero problem seems to be caused by an interaction > >between two bugs: GEOM refuses to return the sector size because > ... > >The next failure I get is: > > > > Can't write config to /dev/da1s1d, error 45 (EOPNOTSUPP) > > This turns out

Re: PCI problems with today's current

Hi, > > > Will the patches you just checked in possibly fix the problem? If so, I'll > > > cvsup and try them out. > > > > 99.999%, Yes. > > Cool! I'll cvsup and try it out. If still NG, please try the attached patch against SupermicroP3TDE6.asl. # _BBN is bridge bus number, my guess is 0x3.

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

[CCs trimmed] >The divide by zero problem seems to be caused by an interaction >between two bugs: GEOM refuses to return the sector size because ... >The next failure I get is: > > Can't write config to /dev/da1s1d, error 45 (EOPNOTSUPP) This turns out to be vinum doing a DIOCWLABEL to ma

Re: PCI problems with today's current

Hi, > > OK, just committed. Also imported the latest version of ACPI CA. > > > > Ken, if your problem still remains with acpi enabled, I'll report this > > to Intel folks. So, please let me know the result. > > Looks like your mail crossed mine on the wire. :) indeed :) > I'm having trouble

Re: signal 6 to XFree86 (Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools...)

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:30:09PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: > Wesley Morgan wrote: > >I had one today, they have decreased significantly since removing the > >Type1 module from my server configuration. > > I've also found that disabling xscreensaver/xlockmore helps - or just > set it to "blank

Re: PCI problems with today's current

On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 11:22:58 +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > Hi, > > From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: PCI problems with today's current > Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On 03-Oct-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > >

Re: PCI problems with today's current

Hi, From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: PCI problems with today's current Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 03-Oct-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > I have a Supermicro P3TDE6 motherboard (Serverworks HE-SL chipset) that > > won'

Re: PCI problems with today's current

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 16:03:08 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 03-Oct-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > I have a Supermicro P3TDE6 motherboard (Serverworks HE-SL chipset) that > > won't boot with today's -current. > > > > -current from August 23rd sources boots fine. > > > > It looks li

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robe rt Watson writes: >However, here's a patch that makes Vinum use namei() to rely on devfs to >locate requested devices instead of parsing the device name and guessing >the device number (incorrectly with GEOM). Unfortunately, I almost >immediately run into a di

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes: > > >the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the > >CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom. > > Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD devices. > > Can yo

Re: PCI problems with today's current

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 18:39:08 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 16:03:08 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On 03-Oct-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > > I have a Supermicro P3TDE6 motherboard (Serverworks HE-SL chipset) that > > > won't boot with today's -current.

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

* De: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-04 ] [ Subjecte: Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost ] > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > > > On the general topic of access to devices before a root has been found, > > Maxime Henrion <[EMAI

Re: ACPI errors and then panic

Hi, # ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem. From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ACPI errors and then panic Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My laptop appears to work ok

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 20:29:51 -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >> FWIW, I've never seen this code. The dates on the patch suggest that >> it was made in the last quarter of an hour: > > I didn't claim that this was his code. This was code

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > On the general topic of access to devices before a root has been found, > Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has done some interesting work on > 'rootfs', a pseudofs used to bootstrap support for devfs, etc. In such an > environment, Vinum and other c

Re: PCI problems with today's current

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 16:03:08 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 03-Oct-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > I have a Supermicro P3TDE6 motherboard (Serverworks HE-SL chipset) that > > won't boot with today's -current. > > > > -current from August 23rd sources boots fine. > > > > It looks li

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > FWIW, I've never seen this code. The dates on the patch suggest that > it was made in the last quarter of an hour: I didn't claim that this was his code. This was code I just wrote to address Vinum not finding the devices due to major/minor num

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 20:21:29 -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: >> >>> The assumption here is that the devfs will be available to the system >>> before the root is mounted transparently over it. This is

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 16:03:24 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Terry Lambert wrote: > >> Emiel Kollof wrote: > >>> * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: > > sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 20:07:11 -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > >> The assumption here is that the devfs will be available to the system >> before the root is mounted transparently over it. This is also doable >> with an unmounted instance of the

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > The assumption here is that the devfs will be available to the system > > before the root is mounted transparently over it. This is also doable > > with an unmounted instance of the backing devfs, not yet

ACPI errors and then panic

My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get suspend, resume, etc. I have never been able to get ACPI to work with it, including with a -current as of 2 hours ago. If ACPI is enabled, I get a spew of: ACPI-0412 *** Error: NsSearchAndEnter: Bad character in ACPI name and

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 16:03:24 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: >> Emiel Kollof wrote: >>> * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c: >> >> [ ... ] >> This crud has *go

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 14:11:57 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writ > es >> : >>> On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote: On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [...] > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inven

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > The assumption here is that the devfs will be available to the system > before the root is mounted transparently over it. This is also doable > with an unmounted instance of the backing devfs, not yet mounted on > /dev, if a transparent mount of / over

RE: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

> > Terry Lambert wrote: > > Emiel Kollof wrote: > > > * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: > > > > > > > > sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c: > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > This crud has *got* to be taken out and shot, then > rewo

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > I think the major problem with the Vinum code is that it isn't > very readable in an 80 column editor window with 8 column tabs, > but that's pretty much the worst you can say about it, other than > the code has not been maintained by the people changing

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

Terry Lambert wrote: > Emiel Kollof wrote: > > * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: > > > > > > sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c: > > [ ... ] > > > > This crud has *got* to be taken out and shot, then reworked to do it > > > proper

alpha tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

At 9:02 PM +0200 10/4/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >There are numerous architectural issues which have never been >fixed in vinum, and one or more of these bits now. > >Whoever loves vinum will have to chase it/them down and fix it. > >If I receive patches or requests for changes to GEOM as result

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

Emiel Kollof wrote: > * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: > > > > sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c: [ ... ] > > This crud has *got* to be taken out and shot, then reworked to do it > > properly. > > Amen! (and no, I'm not volunteer

Re: (forw) CryptoGraphic Disk.

* Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Emiel Kollof writes: > >Seems that the NetBSD-current people have a cool new toy. Any chance of > >getting this into FreeBSD CURRENT in the future? See forward. > > We already have much the same in the GEOM_AES modu

Re: (forw) CryptoGraphic Disk.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Emiel Kollof writes: >Hi folks, > >Seems that the NetBSD-current people have a cool new toy. Any chance of >getting this into FreeBSD CURRENT in the future? See forward. We already have much the same in the GEOM_AES module, although the configuration is not as sli

(forw) CryptoGraphic Disk.

Hi folks, Seems that the NetBSD-current people have a cool new toy. Any chance of getting this into FreeBSD CURRENT in the future? See forward. Cheers, Emiel - Forwarded message from Roland Dowdeswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 15:09:22 -0400 From: Roland Dowdeswell

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

* Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: > > sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c: > [Big ugly if/else fallthrough snipped] Ick... Which sick person wrote that? switch() and cpp macros usually do wonders in cases like these in terms of

Re: Vote: lib/libexpat -> lib/libbsdxml

In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: >(renaming the directory seems like a fine idea to me, but I think >you should check with PHK first, seeing that he is very actively >working there) My initial thought was that leaving the directory called libexpat was

Re: Vote: lib/libexpat -> lib/libbsdxml

At 5:56 PM +0300 10/4/02, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >Hi there! > >I'd like to rename src/lib/libexpat to src/lib/libbsdxml. >The reason I think it should be done is the output of the >following command (libpam not being an exception here): > >cd src/lib; for dir in lib*; do [ "$dir" != "lib`cd $dir; m

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writ es > : > >On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote: > >> On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> [...] > >> > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in > >> > the system, so can I get you to try again maki

Re: ccd striping ?? [Was: vinum disks lost]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writes : >On 04.10-12:45, Lars Eggert wrote: >[...] >> For some reason I was under the (mis?)impression that ccd was no longer >> being maintained... If it works with geom, we can probably move our >> machines over to ccd. They're all no-frills stripes, so

RC_NG for local rc scripts

I was looking at how the RC_NG base scripts work, and decide to try changing a few ports rc scripts to RC_NG. The process was simple enough to convert the security/cyrus_sasl{,2} (pwcheck.sh, saslauthd{1,}.sh), mail/cyrus_imapd{,2} (imapd.sh), net/openldap{,2} (slapd.sh) and databases/mysql323-{

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel E > ischen writes: > >On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > >> lian Elischer writes: > >> > >> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new featu

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the > >responsibility to make older subsystems work. > > I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that: > > When will you have made KSE work on spa

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > >> > >> Oh, you mean like KSE on Alpha? > > > > What existing functionality on the alpha does KSE stop? > > So you agree that requiring vinum users to turn off GEOM is ok? Part > of adding a new feature is providing proof of concept that it works

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel E ischen writes: >On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju >> lian Elischer writes: >> >> >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the >> >responsibility to make older subsystems work.

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the > >responsibility to make older subsystems work. > > I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that: > > When will you

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

* De: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-04 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated... ] > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan Farfeleder writes: > > > > I have committed your patch, but left it #undef'ed until we get > the kernel straightened out. > > O

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan Farfeleder writes: > I have committed your patch, but left it #undef'ed until we get the kernel straightened out. On behalf of the FreeBSD project I have to warn you that if you persist in doing work of this kind over and over again, you will eventually be

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

On 04-Oct-2002 Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Stefan Farfeleder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-04 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated... ] >> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > >> > Hi Stefan, >> > >> > I tried this patch and it pan

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > >> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: >> >> >This is a cryptographically si

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the > >responsibility to make older subsystems work. > > I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that: > > When will you h

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

* De: Stefan Farfeleder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-04 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated... ] > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > I tried this patch and it paniced my (almost-) current machine with > >

HEADSUP: acpica-unix-20021002 imported (Re: cvs commit:src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica - Imported sources)

I've imported Intel acpica-unix-20021002 which is the latest version. It seems that some problems related with ACPI namespace parsing are solved from 20020815. Detailed info. about changes is available at: http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt If you have any prob

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: > >> >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > >> > > >> >-

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Holmes write s: >As I understand vinum & ccd (please correct me if I am wrong), this will >keep ccd from ever achieving the performance and ease of use of vinum. I don't think anybody advocated ccd as a wholesale replacement for vinum. That being said, I h

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

Lars Eggert wrote: > For some reason I was under the (mis?)impression that ccd was no longer > being maintained... If it works with geom, we can probably move our > machines over to ccd. They're all no-frills stripes, so ccd > functionality is good enough. >From the man page of ccd: ccd ha

ccd striping ?? [Was: vinum disks lost]

On 04.10-12:45, Lars Eggert wrote: [...] > For some reason I was under the (mis?)impression that ccd was no longer > being maintained... If it works with geom, we can probably move our > machines over to ccd. They're all no-frills stripes, so ccd > functionality is good enough. [...] i'm not c

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju lian Elischer writes: >No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the >responsibility to make older subsystems work. I'm _so_ glad to hear _you_ say that: When will you have made KSE work on sparc64 and ia64 ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp

RE: PCI problems with today's current

On 03-Oct-2002 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > I have a Supermicro P3TDE6 motherboard (Serverworks HE-SL chipset) that > won't boot with today's -current. > > -current from August 23rd sources boots fine. > > It looks like the PCI bus probe is failing somehow. > > I've seen other folks complainin

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: >> >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. >> > >> >--ms040706010906030302070807 >> >Content-Type: text/plain; chars

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: > >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > > > >--ms040706010906030302070807 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > >Content-Transfer-Encod

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: >> >>I'd consider not having vinum work under geom a show-stopper... at least >>until geom can stripe. > > > Well, the showstopper is in vinum. The fact that ccd(4) works > seamlessly with GEOM is testament to this.

Re: [Call for testers] acpica-unix-20020918

Hello, It works fine here, and the battery status works now! No lid switch yet though :-/ Thanks! Mvh, Frode Nordahl On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:27, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > [forgot to announce] > Please try the latest version acpica-unix-20020829, patches for > FreeBSD at: > http://peopl

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > >--ms040706010906030302070807 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> I would need to

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > I would need to look at the code to be able to tell, I don't have > time for that. I'd consider not having vinum work under geom a show-stopper... at least until geom can stripe. Lars -- Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> USC Information Sciences Institute

Re: Meaning of net.inet.tcp.inflight_debug output?

:Hi, : :what does this mean? Is it important? :---snip--- :kernel: 0xc27b4814 bw 4 rttbest 2735 srtt 2250 bwnd 2803 :kernel: 0xc0ef235c bw 23101 rttbest 680 srtt 293056 bwnd 1063153 :kernel: 0xc27b435c bw 54061 rttbest 1297 srtt 1756 bwnd 28636 :kernel: 0xc27b435c bw 47663 rttbest 1297 srtt 1784

Re: GNOME 2.0 DOES NOT COMPILE

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 12:23, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Joe, the libkvm changes should work all the way back to 4.x > (I haven't tested this of course) but 'ps has been using it to > get this info for years) that would simplify the > conditionals. > (i.e just remove the old code) Yep, my patch

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writes : >On 04.10-18:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message n0go013 writes : >> >On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote: >> > > On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > > [...] >> > > > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in >> > >

Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost

On 04.10-18:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message n0go013 writes : > >On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote: > > > On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > [...] > > > > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in > > > > the system, so can I get you to try again making sure

i386 tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:10:57AM -0700, Bill Huey said: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:24:03AM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote: > > Almost. It's indeed called Ant but has been developed under the > > umbrella of the Apache Jakarta project. > > I used it to build Tomcat tonight and it looks

Re: GNOME 2.0 DOES NOT COMPILE

Joe, the libkvm changes should work all the way back to 4.x (I haven't tested this of course) but 'ps has been using it to get this info for years) that would simplify the conditionals. (i.e just remove the old code) On 4 Oct 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 10:39, Lars

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writes : >On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote: >> On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> [...] >> > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in >> > the system, so can I get you to try again making sure you have >> > rev. 1.20 of src/sys/g

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On 04.10-15:40, fergus wrote: > On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > [...] > > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in > > the system, so can I get you to try again making sure you have > > rev. 1.20 of src/sys/geom/geom_disk.c ? [...] > i'll let you know the test re

Re: GNOME 2.0 DOES NOT COMPILE

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 10:39, Lars Eggert wrote: > The Gupta Age wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I was trying to compile GNOME 2.0 on a freebsd current > > machine on which the world was recently cvsuped, built > > and installed. CVSUP-ed on 09/22/2002 > > > > the gnome compilation breaks while trying to

$B!y$?$^$2$?%K%e!<%9!y(J

EBEKEBEKEBEKEBEKEBEKEBEKEBEKEB @@ @@@@@@@@@@@™@‚½‚Ü‚°‚½ƒjƒ…[ƒX@™ @@@@— ƒrƒfƒI”Ì”„E“ÁŽêƒ_ƒbƒ`ƒƒCƒtE‚r‚lƒNƒ‰ƒu @@‚`‚u’j—D•åWE‰‡•ŒðÛE‚Žû“üŠmŽÀuo’£ƒzƒXƒgv•åW @@@@@@@@¦¦¦@‚»‚Ì‘¼— î•ñ–žÚ@¦¦¦ @EBEKEBEK

Re: GNOME 2.0 DOES NOT COMPILE

The Gupta Age wrote: > Hi. > > I was trying to compile GNOME 2.0 on a freebsd current > machine on which the world was recently cvsuped, built > and installed. CVSUP-ed on 09/22/2002 > > the gnome compilation breaks while trying to compile > libgtop2. here is the error: I ran into the same prob

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:24:03AM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote: > Almost. It's indeed called Ant but has been developed under the > umbrella of the Apache Jakarta project. I used it to build Tomcat tonight and it looks to be a very power package. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 06:26 US/Eastern, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-10-03 22:22, Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> If most file formats would be XML-based (yes I know XML should not >>> replace all file formats, but it comes a g

Vote: lib/libexpat -> lib/libbsdxml

Hi there! I'd like to rename src/lib/libexpat to src/lib/libbsdxml. The reason I think it should be done is the output of the following command (libpam not being an exception here): cd src/lib; for dir in lib*; do [ "$dir" != "lib`cd $dir; make -V LIB`" ] && echo $dir; done Cheers, -- Ruslan

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > Can you try the patch at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > > > It works! Already 5 hours without a single signal 6. A slightly different version wit

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

On 04.10-14:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I suspect vinum uses this sysctl to get an inventory of disks in > the system, so can I get you to try again making sure you have > rev. 1.20 of src/sys/geom/geom_disk.c ? still in the middle of the build but i don't think so -- it looks like vinum is us

Parsing route dump treceived by using sysctl

Hi, I am currently trying to get a route dump in freebsd4.4 using sysctl with NET_RT_DUMP. I am running into problems while parsing the returned rt_msghdr structures. The sockaddr structures returned after the rt_msghdr are messed up and it is not giving correct gateway or netmask. For ex: whe

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Can you try the patch at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > > > I haven't had a chance to compile or test it, but it should > > be easy enough to fix if it doesn't (compile). > > I

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > I tried this patch and it paniced my (almost-) current machine with > a pagefault in the kqueue code: Bravo! > > I can see that there is some amount of #ifdef stuff in your patch, The #ifdefs are already in

Meaning of net.inet.tcp.inflight_debug output?

Hi, what does this mean? Is it important? ---snip--- kernel: 0xc27b4814 bw 4 rttbest 2735 srtt 2250 bwnd 2803 kernel: 0xc0ef235c bw 23101 rttbest 680 srtt 293056 bwnd 1063153 kernel: 0xc27b435c bw 54061 rttbest 1297 srtt 1756 bwnd 28636 kernel: 0xc27b435c bw 47663 rttbest 1297 srtt 1784 bwnd 2579

Re: sym disabling controller LED?

Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a Dawicontrol 2975U SCSI controller, which is handled by the sym > driver: > > sym0: <875> port 0xac00-0xacff mem > 0xe3201000-0xe3201fff,0xe3203000-0xe32030ff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci0 > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checki

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On 2002-10-03 22:22, Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If most file formats would be XML-based (yes I know XML should not > > replace all file formats, but it comes a great way) then these > > formats would be leveraged by the fact that there

Re: Ready to connect libbsdxml (nee libexpat) to the build !

On (2002/10/04 13:26), Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > What was the concensus on the xmlwf program, did we want it in > the tree or not ? Would it be useful to anybody or is it just > a hackers-proof-of-concept thing ? I think it needs to stay out of the base system, so that 3rd party applications a

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, n0go013 writes: >rebuilt kernel with GEOM and everything is ok but disklabel now dumps a >warning message for each undefined partition. should these be manually >initialised to valid entries or is this a bug ? > >more importantly vinum can no longer find the drives

[ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

rebuilt kernel with GEOM and everything is ok but disklabel now dumps a warning message for each undefined partition. should these be manually initialised to valid entries or is this a bug ? more importantly vinum can no longer find the drives but i'm not sure thats related as cvsup was from 200

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, : > Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > > Additional details: it cause not only cvsupd death, but rarely cvsup : > > signal 6 death too with this diagnostic: : > > : > >

  1   2   >