On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> This is NOT a toolchain issue he is talking about, but a kernel one.
> Please forget all about the toolchain issue. It is a non-issue. I and
> kan are the only ones that it has inconvinced. Everyone else has been
> able to totally ignore it. I'l
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:42:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
> > > 5.x. Am I wrong?
> >
> > We should be *very* careful to accurately describe
I just updated it for gcc 3.2.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* De: Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: GCC 3.2.1-pre and /usr/src/UPDATING ]
> Someone needs to update /usr/src/UPDATING then, so people will
> find out about this need to recompile their C++ world. Who is
> it that updates UPDATING these days?
W
At 4:59 PM -0400 9/2/02, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>On Sunday 01 September 2002 05:58 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>= GCC 3.2.1-pre is now in the tree. Please let me know if you
>= see any problems recompiling your world/kernel.
>=
>= Remember to recompile your C++ ports. GCC 3.2 is not binary
>= comp
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:30:19PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> gordont> There is one outstanding issue with the sendmail script that I'm working on
> gordont> a solution for. In the general case it should work fine. If you set
> gordont> sendmail_enable="NONE" it will echo a benign warnin
gordont> There is one outstanding issue with the sendmail script that I'm working on
gordont> a solution for. In the general case it should work fine. If you set
gordont> sendmail_enable="NONE" it will echo a benign warning about it being set
gordont> improperly.
I've been discussing the issue wi
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
> > > method.o: In function `use_thunk':
> > > method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:05:48PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
>
> And how does one do that?
>
You never posted any error messages you were getting, so I can
only guess what is going on. The patch below gets rpm to compile
on my -current. Never tested it on -stable though, it might
break compiles
I ran into this, and found that re-running config and make depend made it
go away. Didn't have time to do any other follow-up.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Long, Scott wrote:
> >
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:21:12PM -0700,
Peter Wemm said words to the effect of;
> Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
> > > method.o: In function `use_thunk':
>
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
> > method.o: In function `use_thunk':
> > method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
>
> Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build 3.2 or
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:10:42PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> Have no idea what is your problem with linux_base, but rpm build fine
> here after one gets past __size_t and machine/types.h.
And how does one do that?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
> Where can I find this patch? I didn't see it in the message body or attached to any
>of your previous messages.
Sorry,
apparently attachments are stripped now before being delivered
to the mailing lists. The patch is below:
Index: cp/cp-lang.c
==
> Well, I ended up unlinking it from the build and am installing now.
> Once I get a fresh world installed, I'll try and rebuild world again
> to see if the problem persists. Would you like me to get a ktrace of
> aicasm running before I rebuild world? -sc
That would have been interesting.
--
> * De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support
in
> > > 5.x. Am I wrong?
> >
> > We sho
The patch I sent is reversed. Use patch -R to apply.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:20:49 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe
> > -march=pentiumpro -c ./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo
> ^
>
> Maybe "-march=*" doesn't work?
I traced it down to bro
Andrea Campi wrote:
> > > cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe\
> > > -march=athlon -c ./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo
> > ^
>
> I get the same error on a P3:
>
> cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe
> -march=
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:27:45 -0700
Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing the exact same thing. I can't install linux_base either,
> nor can I build rpm.
Have no idea what is your problem with linux_base, but rpm build fine
here after one gets past __size_t and machine/types.h.
-
* De: Richard Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
> > I think you're extremeley confused.
>
> In what way? Or are you just being rude?
GCC being able to produce a.out format binaries has nothing to do with
the ability of a Lisp or
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:29:23AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> I tried CFLAGS with "-O[1|2]" and with or without "-march=-pentium3".
> Always the same error.
>
> Anyone else?
I'm seeing the exact same thing. I can't install linux_base either, nor
can I build rpm.
- alex
To Unsubscr
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:17:25AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> > > > It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
>
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
> I think you're extremeley confused.
In what way? Or are you just being rude?
-- RIchard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
i cvsup'd last night, and now i tried portupdate -a -f and debugging
build problems with libtool i found that on my system i can make perl spin
and consume 100% of a CPU just by:
perl -pe s/foo/bar/g /tmp
(turs out i can do this with any perl command, even perl --version...)
i also can't kill
Dear all,
I have now uploaded the final text of my dissertation on
http://www.geocities.com/tzmnlaos/oss/tzouris_diss.pdf
Thanks to everybody that helped towards the completions of this research.
Best Regards,
Menelaos.
Tzouris,M wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I uploaded a newer version of my
At 12:29 AM 9/3/2002 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
>Hi,
>with -current I get during compiling kdelibs3 (and after successfully compiling
>qt3 and arts):
>...
>c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../dcop -I../libltdl -I../kdecore -I../kdeui
>-I../kio -I../kio/kio -I../kio/kfile -I/usr/X11R6/inc
* De: Richard Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
> > yes binary support will remain.. if you need to generate new ones (?)
>
> You say this as if no-one would want to do it, but I still use
> programs (lisp and prolog compilers) th
> yes binary support will remain.. if you need to generate new ones (?)
You say this as if no-one would want to do it, but I still use
programs (lisp and prolog compilers) that need to generate and read in
compiled .o files, and "undump" themselves after reading in such
files, and which are never
Hi,
with -current I get during compiling kdelibs3 (and after successfully compiling
qt3 and arts):
...
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../dcop -I../libltdl -I../kdecore -I../kdeui
-I../kio -I../kio/kio -I../kio/kfile -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -
pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr
> > Well, I ended up unlinking it from the build and am installing
> > now. Once I get a fresh world installed, I'll try and rebuild
> > world again to see if the problem persists. Would you like me to
> > get a ktrace of aicasm running before I rebuild world? -sc
>
> Sure. Thanks a lot.
Hrm
> > > > Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following?
> > I'm able to
> > > > build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge.
> > I've not seen
> > > > this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
> > >
> > > This is the third report of this that I've
On Sunday 01 September 2002 05:58 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
= GCC 3.2.1-pre is now in the tree. Please let me know if you see any
= problems recompiling your world/kernel.
=
= Remember to recompile your C++ ports. GCC 3.2 is not binary compatible
= with 3.1.
Most excellent! Thanks!
-mi
Greetings everyone:
I decided to pull the trigger and try to run FreeBSD on my IBM
ThinkPad 770Z with a 3COM 3CXFEM656C 10/100 NIC + 56k modem Cardbus combo.
Originally I tried 4.6.2-RELEASE but Cardbus isn't support so I tried both
a NetGear FA411 10/100 PCMCIA and the LinkSys PCM100 Eth
Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The complete transcript is available here:
> > http://sparc64.style9.org/sparc64.log
>
> Which still does not answer my question. What GCC version is on this
> machine?
Sorry, I thought your question was whether it was in the cross
building st
> The complete transcript is available here:
> http://sparc64.style9.org/sparc64.log
Which still does not answer my question. What GCC version is on this
machine?
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
> > method.o: In function `use_thunk':
> > method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
>
> Is this gcc 3.1 t
> > Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following? I'm able to
> > build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge. I've not seen
> > this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
>
> This is the third report of this that I've seen, and I'm completely
> baf
>
> Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following? I'm able to
> build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge. I've not seen
> this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
This is the third report of this that I've seen, and I'm completely
baffled. Ho
Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following? I'm able to
build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge. I've not seen
this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
===> aic7xxx
===> aic7xxx/aicasm
make -f /usr/src/sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm/../../../dev
Le 2002-09-01, Scott Long écrivait :
> > ===> aic7xxx/ahc
> > (null): Unable to malloc scope object
> > *** Error code 70
>
> Um, what?
>
> I just did a buildworld, followed by a buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
> and did not see this.
Um, I see this one as well, on a not-too-recent -CURRENT that
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
> method.o: In function `use_thunk':
> method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build 3.2 or gcc 3.2 trying to build itself?
Buildwo
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> I made it 1 because I wanted to get feedback on what hardware is
> broken. So far only two people have complained. Hundreds complained
> when the default was 0. Seems like the choice was good to me still.
>
I knew there was a
* De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
> > 5.x. Am I wrong?
>
> We should b
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
> > ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
> > libiconv-1.8_1.
> >
> >
> > cc -I. -I. -I../include -
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
> > 5.x. Am I wrong?
>
> We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is being
> suggested.
>
>
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:52:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I've had to add ex, touch and gencat to the installworld target. And
> : I've still not manged to complete a installworld.
> :
> : anyb
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
> 5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is being
suggested.
I believe it is that 5.x a.out binaries not be supported.
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:29:05AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> > I think it should be turned off now. That will help shake out any issues
> > and people complaining that it is gone. The sooner the better.
>
> It isn't a simple knob to "turn it off". It requires several
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've had to add ex, touch and gencat to the installworld target. And
: I've still not manged to complete a installworld.
:
: anybody else see this?
Index: Makefile.inc1
===
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> > >
> > > > Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
> > > > Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
> > > >
> > > > >
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On (2002/09/01 19:12), Marc Fonvieille wrote:
:
: > I had "freeze at boot" problem with my laptop and -CURRENT:
: >
: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42262
: >
: > I found the solution: setting
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:10:11 -0700
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
>
> What about 3.1.1 release?
I have GCC 3.1.1 port installed on STABLE. libiconv barf when co
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 10:21:13PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > Actually, if 3.2 doesn't use thunks, it's likely to break Mozilla again.
> > > This is really not that big of a deal. I'll just need to alter a patch,
> > > and update the Mozilla people.
> >
> > My understanding from watchi
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:29:05AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I think it should be turned off now. That will help shake out any issues
> and people complaining that it is gone. The sooner the better.
It isn't a simple knob to "turn it off". It requires several source
changes.
To Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
What about 3.1.1 release?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's actually nroff (groff) that aborts.
Even a simple "groff --version" or "groff --help" will produce the
"out of memory" error.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a GCC fault. The bug is in internal gettext library gmake is linked
> with. I looked into read_alias_file function and I simply cannot believe
> what I am seeing there.
PR ports/41075.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [E
Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $ startx
> > [...]
> > xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2): unable to connect to X server
> > xinit: No such process (errno 3): Server error.
Of course those xinit errors are useless; I should have looked at
XFree86.0.log.
> You need to eith
I've had to add ex, touch and gencat to the installworld target. And
I've still not manged to complete a installworld.
anybody else see this?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
> > ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
> > libiconv-1.8_1.
> >
> >
> > cc -I. -I. -I../include -
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:17:25AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> > > It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
> > > by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
> >
> >
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:06:31 -0400
Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do they really believe malloc
^^^ I meant realloc here.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Not a GCC fault. The bug is in internal gettext library gmake is linked
with. I looked into read_alias_file function and I simply cannot believe
what I am seeing there. Do they really believe malloc is supposed to
resize memory in-place all the time? Look what happens with map[0-n]
elements every
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:33:35AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I'm going to toggle the switch to activate rcNG as the default boot scripts.
> If you experience any problems, put rc_ng="NO" in your /etc/rc.conf and
> please report any problems.
There is one outstanding issue with the sendmail sc
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c: In function `ipfw_ctl':
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:2508: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different
size
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:2521: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different
size
Some of the code
I'm going to toggle the switch to activate rcNG as the default boot scripts.
If you experience any problems, put rc_ng="NO" in your /etc/rc.conf and
please report any problems.
-gordon
msg42462/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:34:48AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 01:09:11 +1000 (EST)
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Except I just used it to compile biosboot :-). (I had more problems
> > with ufs2 changes than with the compiler.)
> >
> > Actually, I
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 05:35, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I just finished updating my alpha box to shortly before the gcc3.2
> import and now I'm seeing some weird breakage:
> $ startx
> [...]
> xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2): unable to connect to X server
> xinit: No such process
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:05:40PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:52:56 -0700
> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > O -pipe -march=athlon
> ^^
> This bug is in GCC PR database. Do not use -march=athlon for now.
Okay. In case it matters, wo
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
> > ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
> > libiconv-1.8_1.
> >
> >
> > cc -I. -I. -I../include -
BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:52:56 -0700
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O -pipe -march=athlon
^^
This bug is in GCC PR database. Do not use -march=athlon for now.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
> ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
> libiconv-1.8_1.
>
>
> cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe\
> -march=athlon -c ./iconv.c
To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
libiconv-1.8_1.
cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -march=athlon -c
./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo
In file included from gbk.h:64,
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 01:09:11 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Except I just used it to compile biosboot :-). (I had more problems
> with ufs2 changes than with the compiler.)
>
> Actually, I agree. Not having a clean break in FreeBSD-3 was very
> expensive. Support for ru
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> >
> > > Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
> > > Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
> > >
> > > > aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for comp
On (2002/09/01 19:12), Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> I had "freeze at boot" problem with my laptop and -CURRENT:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42262
>
> I found the solution: setting hw.pci.enable_io_modes to 0.
> So I have a question: that sysctl has to be =1 by default? I mean if
John,
You might want to check out www.rackmount.com. Bought
some 1U/2U rackmount gears from them and pre-loaded with
FreeBSD 4.5. (Six months ago). Their machines are great.
Never had any problem.
Bryan Taylor
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, John Chang wrote:
> Do you know where I could get a good ser
I just finished updating my alpha box to shortly before the gcc3.2
import and now I'm seeing some weird breakage:
$ man ls
out of memory
It's actually nroff (groff) that aborts.
Also:
$ startx
[...]
xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2): unable to connect to X server
xinit: No such proc
Today (after GCC 3.2 import and makeworld) I
try to upgrade 'gmake' port and resulting 'gmake' command
dumps core in the libc's 'qsort'.
When I make 'gmake' without "--with-included-gettext"
option it work - at least I can make 'databases/gdbm' port with
it (which can be made with
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
>
> > Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
> > Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
> >
> > > aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
> > > some boot blocks), but is broken in gc
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >
> > I will import GCC 3.2 snapshot from the top of FSF gcc-3_2-branch in
> > about ten minutes. This task should not take long to complete, but since
> > this is the first time I am doing it, there is good possibility of
> > unexpected delays,
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>
> I will import GCC 3.2 snapshot from the top of FSF gcc-3_2-branch in
> about ten minutes. This task should not take long to complete, but since
> this is the first time I am doing it, there is good possibility of
> unexpected delays, so please be patient.
>
> Plea
[Quoting David Malone, on Sep 2, 12:22, in "Re: CPU slowdown usi ..."]
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:52:20AM +0200, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
> > - Suspending in X freezes the system. I've not found any way
> > out of that, other than hard resetting the system.
>
> Could you try running acpidump be
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
> Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
>
> > aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
> > some boot blocks), but is broken in gcc3 for at least compile-time
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:46:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> This is *totally* UNTRUE:
>
> /usr/local/bin//mutt:
> libslang.so => /usr/local/lib/libslang.so (0x280e5000)
> libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x28148000)
> libssl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.2 (0x28167000)
÷ Sat, 31.08.2002, × 02:04, Jens Schweikhardt ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:03:17PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> # ? Wed, 28.08.2002, ? 23:46, Bruce A. Mah ???:
> # > If memory serves me right, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> # >
> # > > # Do you have time to commit mention o
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:52:20AM +0200, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
> - Suspending in X freezes the system. I've not found any way
> out of that, other than hard resetting the system.
Could you try running acpidump before and after running X? On my
machine the ACPI tables vanish when you run X 'cos
Some experiences with ACPI and APM on a Toshiba Portege 7220cte.
Interesting is the extreme CPU slow-down after suspend/resume
using ACPI.
Running current, (cvsup-ed Aug. 30). A fixed-up ASL (similar to
the Tecra8200.asl diff from Mitsuru IWASAKI) is used with
acpi_dsdt_load="YES" in /boot/load
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> > It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
> > by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
>
> How would gcc-3.2 get more buggy over time than it is today??
I said it was
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
> aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
> some boot blocks), but is broken in gcc3 for at least compile-time
Which boot blocks?
> assignments to long longs and
> > As near as I can tell the panic is happening in VOP_GETATTR(). It looks
> > to me like it would be possible for the vnode to be recycled between the
> > time when it passes the vp->v_mount test at the top of the loop and the
> > time when vn_lock() succeeds. Shouldn't we bump the vnode ref
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
> yesterday's -current was will affect DP2. I rather expected the release
> engineers to at least querry the lists to ask what the known issues are
> before picking whic
97 matches
Mail list logo
