On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > > This is NOT a toolchain issue he is talking about, but a kernel one. > Please forget all about the toolchain issue. It is a non-issue. I and > kan are the only ones that it has inconvinced. Everyone else has been > able to totally ignore it. I'll probably do something about it next > week. I think that the ability to run 2.2.6 binaries should remain. the ability to generate them or even debug them can be almost completely removed.. there are always other ways to do that.... (e.g. boot 2.2.6 in a vmware machine or run them in a chroot) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Peter Wemm
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Bruce Evans
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Alexander Kabaev
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Gordon Tetlow
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 David O'Brien
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Peter Wemm
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Matthew Emmerton
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 David O'Brien
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 David O'Brien
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Peter Wemm
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Julian Elischer
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Garrett Wollman
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Bruce Evans
- Re: aout support broken in gcc3 Terry Lambert
- web browsers (was: Re: aout support brok... David Schultz
- Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support ... Michael WARDLE
- Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support ... David Schultz
- Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support ... Terry Lambert