* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010712 01:45] wrote:
> * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010712 01:42] wrote:
> > * Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010711 19:08] wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
> > >
> > > The discussion of kt
* John Indra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010712 01:51] wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I have been visiting current.freebsd.org for the past weeks, and see no
> newer i386 snapshots then 20010618. Does it mean -CURRENT is in no "stable"
> condition right now?
current is never "stable", if you want stable stil w
Hi all...
I have been visiting current.freebsd.org for the past weeks, and see no
newer i386 snapshots then 20010618. Does it mean -CURRENT is in no "stable"
condition right now?
tq
/john
Live Free OR Die
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if (fork() == 0) {
> - signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
> + signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
This is unportable.
If you want automatic zombie reaping, better don't use the simplified
signal(3) handling, but inste
Oops,
At Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:26:58 +0900,
I wrote:
> Actually this doesn't help libpam.so.1, because the new pam modules
> (pam_*.so) do not work with it. Which means you need to recompile
> the programs linked with it, such as sudo, xdm, and the X server.
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010712 01:42] wrote:
> * Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010711 19:08] wrote:
> >
> > The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
> >
> > The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
> > BSD/OS, so it needs up
* Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010711 19:08] wrote:
>
> The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
>
> The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
> BSD/OS, so it needs updating.
I'm just reviewing the file stuff, I have a number of updates ma
At Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:16:33 -0700 (PDT),
Mark Murray wrote:
> markm 2001/07/09 11:16:33 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> lib/libpam Makefile.inc
> Log:
> Bump the major number. The libraries API has changed incompatibly.
Actually this doesn't help libpam.so.1, because the new
Hi,
After the major number bump of libpam (1 to 2) on July 9,
libpam-linked binaries (xdm, sudo, etc.) dump core.
knu-san ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said me that this problem is caused by
libpam major bump. Old libpam shared lib (libpam.so.1) requires
pam_*.so, but there not exist pam_*.so for libpam.s
At 11:36 AM -0500 7/2/01, Damieon Stark wrote:
>Below is the message I sent about a unified libpwutil, and
>possibly integrating it into FreeBSD. _ANY_ feedback, positive
>or negitive would be appreciated as it will help to validate my
>existance ;)
I like the idea, but I must admit to not havin
At 9:43 PM +0200 7/11/01, Anton Berezin wrote:
> At 2:55 PM +0200 7/11/01, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> > With current as of June 20 I can no longer print to a remote
> > printer. Syslog says "filter 'f' exited (retcode=108)".
> >
> > I added a "set -x" to the filter which is a shell program
Hi All,
FreeBSD -current hasn't correctly detected the CDROM drive in my laptop
for some time now. I've traced the problem down to the drive returning
an invalid ATAPI_LSB_MAGIC and ATAPI_MSB_MAGIC which is checked at line
704 in dev/ata/ata-all.c
It returns d0 d0, which I believe is an o
Hi all,
When I brought my -current box forward from a May build, my
VPN stopped working. From tcpdump & netstat -s I see the pkts
come & go correctly, but are dropped because:
netstat -s: "ip: xx packets for unknown/unsupported protocol".
I have "net.inet.ip.check_interface=0" which was suffici
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:55:33PM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> Sorry, I was offline for a while (broke my leg). I am now recovering
> and slowly catching up. The laptop which had this problem won't be
> back on the ethernet for another two weeks, so I won't be able to do
> more testing.
I have gotten this system to boot with a current SMP kernel from as
late as mid-September 2000, and am working on stabilising the system
so that I can try later versions.
It seems that all the working versions don't use Ultra-160 (I'm not
sure when this hit the tree) - could the problem have been
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Mark Peek wrote:
> At 3:43 PM -0700 7/10/01, David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:29:32PM -0700, Mark Peek wrote:
> > > and a normal build using
> >>
> > >make -DNOPERL MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/iobj buildworld
> >
> >Huh? A normal build shouldn't need -DNOPE
Sorry, I was offline for a while (broke my leg). I am now recovering
and slowly catching up. The laptop which had this problem won't be
back on the ethernet for another two weeks, so I won't be able to do
more testing. And maybe, since so much time has passed, I'd better
CVSup and try again.
A
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:03:40 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura said:
>>> >> I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
>>> >> wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
>>> >> to review this. I'd like to see it committed, so either go ahead
>>> >> or wait
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 01:44:55 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Alfred> I'm also quite sure that you can't call the ktrace functions with
Alfred> any mutexes held so the code is doing to need some help, basically
Alfred> the trick in trapsig() and postsig() is to generate the ktr
19 matches
Mail list logo
