At Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:59:38 +0200,
Georg-W. Koltermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:32:58PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >
> > Georg-W. Koltermann writes:
> >
> > <...>
> > > In order to get real performance I would like to run either the SUN
> > > JDK with -h
ÂÛ ÇÍÀÅÒÅ ×ÒÎ ÒÀÊÎÅ
ÃÐÈÍÌÅÉË ?
ÝÒÎ ÀÊÖÈÎÍÅÐÍÛÉ ØÀÍÒÀÆ, ÀÃÐÅÑÑÈÂÍÎÅ
ÏÎÃËÎÙÅÍÈÅ ÏÐÅÄÏÐÈßÒÈÉ, ÏÅÐÅÕÂÀÒ
ÓÏÐÀÂËÅÍÈß ÀÎ, ÑÀÁÎÒÀÆ ÐÀÁÎÒÛ
ÏÐÅÄÏÐÈßÒÈß, ÓÑÒÐÀÍÅÍÈÅ ÊÎÍÊÓÐÅÍÒÎÂ È
ÌÍÎÃÎÅ ÄÐÓÃÎÅ, ÍÎ ÇÀÌÅÒÜÒÅ, ÊÀÊ ÍÅ
ÏÀÐÀÄÎÊÑÀËÜÍÎ, ÂѨ  ÐÀÌÊÀÕ ÇÀÊÎÍÀ!
Åñëè åù¸ 5-10 ëåò íàçàä ÿâëåíèå
ãðèíìåéëà áûëî ïðåðî
Brain fart on my end. Sorry for wasted bandwidth.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin P.
> Grubin
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 12:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: strangeness in recent current
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I c
Folks,
I checked the commits and the recent list mail, but there's no hint as to
why a recent world (supped earlier this evening) would have had this happen.
It seems when I attempt to execute non-native binaries (such as linux
binaries: netscape, etc) I am seeing complaints like the following:
So the question remains..
where was I supposed to change the interrupt mentionned in the
UPDATING entry..
if not in the pccard.conf, then where?
I certainly get the 'hangs' mentionned as being a symptom
of NOT doing it..
Warner?
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 a
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > kernel: pcic1: irq 11 at device 4.1 on pci0
>
> > in pccard.conf I had
> >
> > irq 11
> >
> > is this not what I was supposed to do?
>
> Sorry, I guess maybe this directive is counter-intuative. It supposed to
> be a list
After blowing away my obj/ and src/ directories and
getting them fresh, this problem was no longer
present... not sure what caused them, but either
I had something strange in my obj/ or src/ tree,
or the problem was fixed in the last week.
Regards,
Tony.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> Why can't a filesystem hacker back it out until his return? Things are
> not getting better and this is tripping up more and more people.
The enclosed patch might help somewhat against the "active pagedep"
panics introduced in revision 1.98 of ffs_softdep.c. Instead of a
panic, a message is p
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:33:22PM +1000, Idea Receiver wrote:
>
> I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
> -stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
>
> recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
> is to accept
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:55:40PM -0700, Seth Kingsley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > kernel: pcic1: irq 11 at device 4.1 on pci0
>
> > in pccard.conf I had
> >
> > irq 11
> >
> > is this not what I was supposed to do?
>
> Sorry, I guess maybe t
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> kernel: pcic1: irq 11 at device 4.1 on pci0
> in pccard.conf I had
>
> irq 11
>
> is this not what I was supposed to do?
Sorry, I guess maybe this directive is counter-intuative. It supposed to
be a list of the free irq's in t
I started tracking -current about 5 years ago. It was interesting. I
learned a lot. I did a few "fox paws" and saw a few. Maybe I helped
a time or two in testing and reporting.
My last world was two or three months ago. The one before that was
similar. I am not tracking so I should be with
I upgraded to last nights's -current.
UPGRADING said:
20010604:
pccard support for pci cards has been committed. You must change
your /etc/pccard.conf irq lines. It must match the irq used by
pcic device. Interrupt storms may result if you fail to do this.
Inter
> Brian Somers wrote:
>
> > I've had reports of this in the past. The other end is sending a
> > ``code 5'' packet - something that doesn't appear in the spec :(
> >
> > ppp(8) just ignores these (emitting a warning), they shouldn't be
> > causing any problems themselves (even if CBCP is actuall
Brian Somers wrote:
> I've had reports of this in the past. The other end is sending a
> ``code 5'' packet - something that doesn't appear in the spec :(
>
> ppp(8) just ignores these (emitting a warning), they shouldn't be
> causing any problems themselves (even if CBCP is actually being used).
I sent this to Mobile yesterday and didn't get an answer. I sure don't
feel good being the only person with this problem, but . . . I've cleaned
and polished my pointy hat.
I updated my world and kernel from a cvsup of May 26 to June 6, including
a mergemaster run that included a new pccard.con
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> [ ... FreeBSD Legato client coredump ... ]
>
> > This is really a 'ports' issue...
>
> No, it's an Advocacy and commercial support of FreeBSD issue.
>
>
> > I don't know why this happens. It was suggested that it
> > was pr
> >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >0x28121637 in _fd_lock_backout () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
>
> You're not running -current if you're using libc_r.so.4.
> We're at libc_r.so.5. And fd locks have also been disabled
> in -current.
>
err~~ sorry about my stupid.
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wrot
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wro
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wro
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wrot
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Idea Receiver wrote:
> I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
> -stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
>
> recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
> is to accept TCP connection from remo
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wro
Gordon Tetlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I'm able to setup the realm correctly but when I try to run the
> k5admind daemon, it cores whenever I try to connect to it. I'll look into
> building a debug version and try to get some more info on this one.
Do you run the k5admind from inetd
Matthew Jacob wrote:
[ ... FreeBSD Legato client coredump ... ]
> This is really a 'ports' issue...
No, it's an Advocacy and commercial support of FreeBSD issue.
> I don't know why this happens. It was suggested that it
> was probably a bug in nsrexecd- malloc maybe. Possibly.
> It doesn't al
On 2001.06.08 00:47 Terry Lambert wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > I think you guys should write a short-and-to-the-point application
> > and send it to the core team.
>
> Feel free to copy mine, and send it to the core team...
>
> /* A short and sweet application */
> int
> main()
> {
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I think you guys should write a short-and-to-the-point application
> and send it to the core team.
Feel free to copy mine, and send it to the core team...
/* A short and sweet application */
int
main()
{
write( 1, "Hello World!\n", 13);
return( 0);
}
28 matches
Mail list logo
