"Thomas D. Dean" wrote:
>
> # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin
> # make clean
> # cd /usr/src
> # make -DNOCLEAN world
>
> fixed the problem. Before, I used 'make -j36 -DNOCLEAN world'. Could
> it be a problem with the Makefile in man?
-DNOCLEAN is not guaranteed to work. Especially when makefiles cha
I have no environment settings that relate to groff and only MANPATH
that relates to man.
There are no local modifications. etc/make.conf only has
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
HAVE_MOTIF= yes
MOTIF_STATIC= yes
USA_RESIDENT= YES
WRKDIRPREFIX= /usr/obj/ports
NO_MODULES= NO
I have always
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:28:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> like NetBSD (and the corresponding sources under /usr/pkgsrc).
>
>Please stick to reasonable ideas. To move the CVS repo from ports/ to
>pkgsrc/ would be totally unreasonable.
I've
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Matthew Thyer wrote:
>
> > Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > The program works on Compaq True64 UNIX v 4.0d
> > > > It also works on Solaris 7 (only tested sparc).
> > > >
> > > > So it seems FreeBSD is broken here.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD just be
< said:
> There are other places where FreeBSD doesn't comply with the
> appropriate standard - packages vs. FHS
I have never heard of ``FHS''. What is its ANSI, FIPS, IEEE, IEC, or
ISO number?
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip
> > service than actual service.
> I disagree. If one of the ports I maintain isn't PREFIX-clean, let me
> know and it _will_
Hi,
ever since this commit: ...
dillon 2000/11/18 15:06:27 PST
Modified files:
sys/kern vfs_bio.c vfs_cluster.c vfs_subr.c
vfs_vnops.c
sys/sys buf.h vnode.h
sys/ufs/ffs ffs_inode.c ffs_softdep.c
sys/ufs/ufs
"Thomas D. Dean" wrote:
>
> >> /usr/bin/groff -S -Wall -mtty-char -man -Tascii | ...
> >
> > should be -mandoc
>
> This was generated by 'man', not me.
I understand that.
> There appears to be a problem in m
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> >>| Partition table | Data|
> >> | Slice 1 | Slice 2 | Slice 3 | Slice 4 |
> >> | Disklabel | Data |
> >> | c |
> >>
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > On the other hand, I also don't want to use mtree.
>
> The only thing you don't like about mtree is it changing ownership +
> modes, right?
Not only that. Using mtree(1) creates busloads of unnecessar
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip
> service than actual service.
I disagree. If one of the ports I maintain isn't PREFIX-clean, let me
know and it _will_ be fixed. If you know others, please open a PR,
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On the other hand, I also don't want to use mtree.
The only thing you don't like about mtree is it changing ownership +
modes, right? If so, what about a new flag to mtree to make it only
create directories and nothing else?
-
>> /usr/bin/groff -S -Wall -mtty-char -man -Tascii | ...
>
> should be -mandoc
This was generated by 'man', not me. There appears to be a problem in
man.
tomdean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
"Thomas D. Dean" wrote:
>
> trying command: (cd /usr/share/man ; /usr/bin/zcat
> /usr/share/man/man8/zzz.8.gz | /usr/bin/tbl |
> /usr/bin/groff -S -Wall -mtty-char -man -Tascii | ...
should be -mandoc
> tr
# ls /usr/share/man/man*/zzz*
/usr/share/man/man8/zzz.8.gz
# ls /usr/share/man/cat*/zzz*
ls: No match.
Ok, so, man zzz should reformat the man page. I have attached the
output of 'man -d zzz' and 'man zzz'
After 'man zzz', I see
# ls /usr/share/man/cat*/zzz*
/usr/share/man/cat8/zzz.8.gz
So, t
There is also a new access point (either just available or "RSN") from
Zyxel (316); it is a combination of a 310 (cable modem/bridged DSL/PPPOE
router) and single-card bridged access point.
I'm using one at work (overkill since I'm not using the router) as a
bridged access point; it works just f
Not likely to happen - people have an investment in the current scheme
and it would certainly mess with their heads if one day FreeBSD
suddenly started doing something entirely different than what it's
been doing for the last 7 years. For those who really want to track
the NetBSD way of doing thi
"Thomas D. Dean" wrote:
>
> Is this the problem I see with mal-formatted man pages?
Possibly. I don't know if we changed files to get our sources working
with the new groff(1). If we did, we definitely have a bootstrapping
problem, because that would mean that we can't reliably create manpages
w
Is this the problem I see with mal-formatted man pages?
The pages appear as 1 block with no headers, tities, etc.
tomdean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >
> > > The attached patches (p4 and p5) try to solve this bootstrapping
> > > problem with groff(1). I have lightly tested this on my -stable
> > > box, and would appreciate
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:22:09PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >
> > > The attached patches (p4 and p5) try to solve this bootstrapping
> > > problem with groff(1).
> >
> > Sorry, I missed this statement before. What exactly are the
> > b
Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:21:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD,
> > storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg.
> That's why PREFIX exists.
I know. Unfortunately, support for P
I dropped off the list for a day, or so, during an ISP change. Did I
miss a resolution?
# ls -l `which groff`
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 62860 Dec 7 00:01 /usr/bin/groff*
# groff -v
GNU troff version 1.16.1
#ls -l `which man`
-r-sr-xr-x 1 man wheel 28576 Dec 7 00:01 /usr/bin/man*
# man -
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:28:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> like NetBSD (and the corresponding sources under /usr/pkgsrc).
Please stick to reasonable ideas. To move the CVS repo from ports/ to
pkgsrc/ would be totally unreasonable.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:28:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Okay, let me rephrase: It would be nice if FreeBSD *by default* stored
> the packages/ports under /usr/pkg, like NetBSD (and the corresponding
> sources under /usr/pkgsrc).
Well, that is one tradition that we'll be breaking if o
> > Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD,
> > storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg.
>
> That's why PREFIX exists.
Okay, let me rephrase: It would be nice if FreeBSD *by default* stored
the packages/ports under /usr/pkg, like NetBSD (and the corresponding
s
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:21:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD,
> storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg.
That's why PREFIX exists.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
> Rant second: FreeBSD *violates* years of traditions with it's
> treatment of /usr/local. /usr/local is for *local* things, not add-on
> software packages! Coopting /usr/local for non-local software creates
> needless complexity and confusion, which of course leads to needless
> pain.
Agreed. It
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Christopher Masto writes:
: > If you're only 10 feet from the base, save several hundred dollars and buy
: > a 4 meter patch cable.
:
: Thanks, that hadn't occurred to me.
It depends on the 10' :-)
My laptop roams between 3' and 75' of my closest outlet. Usually
Brandon D. Valentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> >There are other places where FreeBSD doesn't comply with the
> >appropriate standard - packages vs. FHS, for instance. I claim that
> We don't seek to comply with the arbitrarily devised linux filesystem
> standard. We comply with hier(5), a stan
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
>>There are other places where FreeBSD doesn't comply with the
>>appropriate standard - packages vs. FHS, for instance. I claim that
>
>We don't seek to comply with the arbitrarily devised linux filesystem
>s
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Mike Meyer wrote:
>There are other places where FreeBSD doesn't comply with the
>appropriate standard - packages vs. FHS, for instance. I claim that
We don't seek to comply with the arbitrarily devised linux filesystem
standard. We comply with hier(5), a standard steeped in
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> < said:
> > Um - compliance with what, exactly?
> IEEE Std.1003.1-1990 et seq.
Since no one has bothered to close this PR with a note that this
noncompliance is unacceptable, I'm assuming that no one considers it
so. Further, it's not clear that FreeBS
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:10:05AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> > > They're the same thing in different cases, it's hard to see how one can
> > > be superior in any way other than price.
> >
> > "The most stupid thing was that you couldn't set its network name to
> > anything other than its serial
Christopher Masto wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:23:00PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> > > I am told that the Apple "AirPort Base Station", which is $399, works
> > > well and can be configured with the Java-based thing in the ports
> > > collection. I am further told that the Lucent/ORiNOCO
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:22:09PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > The attached patches (p4 and p5) try to solve this bootstrapping
> > problem with groff(1).
>
> Sorry, I missed this statement before. What exactly are the
> bootstrapping problems you're seeing?
>
$B%Q%A%s%3E9$N=P6L4IM}$NHkL)$G$9(B$B%Q%A%s%3E9$G$N!VBgEv$?$j!W$O%7%^$NItJ,ItJ,$K=8CDH/@8$7$^$9!#!JK\Ev$G$9!#!K(B$B$"$J$?$O$=$N;v$B$J$
$B%Q%A%s%3$r$5$l$kJ}$O@'Hs!"$3$N%[!<%`%Z!<%8$r$4Mw$/$@$5$$!#(B$B!VBgEv$?$j$N;EAH$_!W$d!"%Q%A%s%3E9$N!V=P6L4IM}$N;EAH$_!W$NHkL)$rH=$j$d$9$/@b(B$BL@$7$
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > The attached patches (p4 and p5) try to solve this bootstrapping
> > problem with groff(1). I have lightly tested this on my -stable
> > box, and would appreciate a feedback on them.
>
> Do not rem
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:36:26AM +0900, Tatsumi Hosokawa scribbled:
| At Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:18:50 -0600,
| Michael C . Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > Do you have Alpha boot floppies? Does kons25/big5con/korean compile
| > on Alpha? Would this fit on our ever growing mfsroot.flp and kern
39 matches
Mail list logo
