> Rant second: FreeBSD *violates* years of traditions with it's > treatment of /usr/local. /usr/local is for *local* things, not add-on > software packages! Coopting /usr/local for non-local software creates > needless complexity and confusion, which of course leads to needless > pain. Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD, storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Confusing error messages from shell image activation Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image ac... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell imag... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Confusing error messages from sh... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages fr... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Confusing error message... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Confusing error message... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error mes... sthaug
- Re: Confusing error mes... Will Andrews
- Re: Confusing error mes... sthaug
- Re: Confusing error mes... Will Andrews
- Re: Confusing error mes... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error mes... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Confusing error mes... Jordan Hubbard
- /usr/local misuse (Was:... Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local misuse (... David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local misuse (... Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local misuse (... David O'Brien