Around Today, "Donn Miller" wrote :
DM> > I got disgusted with RP 5 because all of my favorite programs updated
DM> > to G2 format, so I nuked it. Today I installed the latest linux-base
DM> > port, downloaded the binary (non-rpm) version of linux RP 7 and it
DM> > worked great. video
From: Ville-Pertti Keinonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 17 Mar 2000 08:24:51 +0200
::Another (perhaps simpler) alternative might be to try to get it to
::work in SB emulation mode.
::
::I've managed to get it to probe as a SoundBlaster (just by adding
::pci_write_config(dev, 0x41, 0x10, 1) to the pr
Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
>
> Darryl Okahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, I was going to take Ville-Pertti Keinonen's ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > ESS2 mixer code and turn it into an LKM, which I'd then try to add sound
> > output using the Linux code. However, I'm not familiar wi
Darryl Okahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I was going to take Ville-Pertti Keinonen's ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> ESS2 mixer code and turn it into an LKM, which I'd then try to add sound
> output using the Linux code. However, I'm not familiar with how one
> accesses interrupts and DMA
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Hmm... If I have a PII (Actually celeron 300A) or a PIII, which is
> > better, 'pentium' or 'pentiumpro'? I would think the latter, but I've
> > learned not to assume where gcc is concerned.
>
> I think that 'pentium' would result in code
Doug Barton wrote:
> I got disgusted with RP 5 because all of my favorite programs updated
> to G2 format, so I nuked it. Today I installed the latest linux-base
> port, downloaded the binary (non-rpm) version of linux RP 7 and it
> worked great. video and all. This is on an up-to-the-min
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> Anyone get this beast to work on -current? The audio works, but the video
> doesn't work at all. I have COMPAT_LINUX in my kernel, and RealPlayer 5.0
> works pretty well.
I got disgusted with RP 5 because all of my favorite programs updated
to G2 format, so I nuk
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> > Idea Receiver writes:
>
> > "make all" success without any problem.
>
> There was an error but "make all" always complete.
>
> > however, make install fail ;(
>
> What are your CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf ?
default only. CFLAG= -O -pipe
I have recently "upgraded" to current (5.0) and am finding that with the new ATAPI/IDE
driver I am getting filesystem inconsistencies regularly :( This manifests itself
with
fsck
complaining profusely after a crash. The machine has hung _hard_ a couple of times,
and upon reboot fsck complains
i have the same problem, either building from ports or from scratch, so i
make -k install'd it, and while X works, im missing some extensions so its
a bit broken. anybody got a fix for this?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the m
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Mark Newton wrote:
> I think we're talking about different things.
Sorry, I think you're right.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 03:37:22PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> > > in there. I've got all the other posix functions, though. Are
> > > you using Linuxthreads?
> >
> > Everyone is using Linuxthreads now; it's the default.
>
> I didn't
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Mark Newton wrote:
> > in there. I've got all the other posix functions, though. Are you using
> > Linuxthreads?
>
> Everyone is using Linuxthreads now; it's the default.
I didn't think so - it's still a port. We *support* linuxthreads out of
the box, but don't instal
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:29:58PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Mark Newton wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:01:57PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> > > Hmm. Do you get video, though? Also, which plugins did you install?
> >
> > Yup, I get video; like I said, it's w
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Mark Newton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:01:57PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> > Hmm. Do you get video, though? Also, which plugins did you install?
>
> Yup, I get video; like I said, it's working perfectly. I just took it
> through the stock standard installation
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:01:57PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> > I've had it working perfectly with the latest linux_base-6.1 and no
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. Hasn't crashed once so far, which is rather
> > unusual for products from RealNetworks!
>
> Hmm. Do you get video, though? Als
Mark Newton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 05:35:43PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
>
> > Anyone get this beast to work on -current? The audio works, but the video
> > doesn't work at all. I have COMPAT_LINUX in my kernel, and RealPlayer 5.0
> > works pretty well.
>
> I've had it working p
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 05:35:43PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> Anyone get this beast to work on -current? The audio works, but the video
> doesn't work at all. I have COMPAT_LINUX in my kernel, and RealPlayer 5.0
> works pretty well.
I've had it working perfectly with the latest linux_base-
Anyone get this beast to work on -current? The audio works, but the video
doesn't work at all. I have COMPAT_LINUX in my kernel, and RealPlayer 5.0
works pretty well.
$ printenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/local/qt/lib:/usr/local/lib/rvplayer5.0:/usr/local/RealPlayer7/Common:/usr/local/RealPlayer7/Co
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > This is a bug. If install-info is installed, then it isn't a build tool.
> > Build tools are programs/scripts that are needed to build the sources
> > only. They are not installed. Since install-info is installed, it can't
> > be a build tool. this means that we either
> Idea Receiver writes:
> "make all" success without any problem.
There was an error but "make all" always complete.
> however, make install fail ;(
What are your CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf ?
Jean-Marc
--
Jean-Marc ZucconiPGP Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsu
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 09:57:22AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > > > I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
> > > > solution is really as easy as it seems:
> > >
> > > Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the problem w
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> Wondering why one would use -mcpu and not -march. If the code runs only on
> Celerons, PII's, and PIII's why would one *not* use -march.
>
> I'm curious about (possible) breakages with -mcpu or -march compared to -Ox
> settings which seem to br
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> One thing to check would be: did your installworld acutally
> complete? At one point the installworld was falling over in h2ph
> when a crypto-related header file was being perl'ified. If this is
> your problem, try doing a 'make -i installworld'
At 11:01 PM 3/15/00 -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
>Sounds like one of those nasty gcc optimization bugs. I generally
>build my kernel and world with -mpentium -O3 -pipe, and I haven't seen
>any bugs at all. I build everything with these flags without
>problems. The only problems I've see, as mentio
Speaking of ISOs, where is the 4.0-RELEASE ISO, I need it to do up this
machine which I wanna format and install 4.0 clean =/
Matt
--
Matt Heckaman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [Please do not send me]
!Powered by FreeBSD/x86! [http://www.freebsd.org] [any SPAM (UCE) e-mail]
On Thu, 16 M
On Wednesday, 15 March 2000 at 16:29:03 -0500, Mathew Kanner wrote:
> On Mar 15, Mathew Kanner wrote:
>> On Mar 15, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>>> Btw are you running the latest 4.0 or -current code ? there was
>>> a time when we had problems with the HPT and Promise controllers ?
>>
>> The kernel
At 01:42 PM 3/16/00 +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What??? 'pentiumpro' code isn't going to be very optimized for a Pentium
> > (if it even runs at all).
>
>According to the gcc(1) man page, -mpentiumpro is synonymous to
>-mcpu=pentiumpro, which
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 01:12:39PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> >Also take into account that many people are downloading and
> >recoding the images on Windows boxes, which don't have gzip
> >by default.
>
> And then they can xfer it over to their FBSD system, etc..
You're suggesting that
At 11:09 PM 3/15/00 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>That's true. Most of the files in the ISO images are already
>compressed, so trying to gzip it saves only a few percent.
>
>Also take into account that many people are downloading and
>recoding the images on Windows boxes, which don't have gzip
>by
Now that the code freeze is over, can the 64Bit XDR changes be made? This
is the only thing preventing the next release of the rpc.lockd code at this
point.
--
David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acting Lab Director | NYSLP: FREEBSD
Syste
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
> > > solution is really as easy as it seems:
> >
> > Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the problem with
> > install-info was that the system couldn't use the new binary. Are you
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N.
>Dodd" writes:
> : On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Maxim Bolotin wrote:
> : > I sent my changes to Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12 Mar 2000, but
> : > still have no answer, unfortunately I have no commit privs, so
> : > s
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have 1)the usual DSMaestro2E 3-02-98.pdf datasheet, 2)some small stuff
> > > I grabbed off ftp.esstech.com.tw (nolonger exists on the site?) and
>
> I have just got this doc.
> is anyone going to work on this?
Well, I was going to take Vil
-Original Message-
From: Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:57:27 -0600
Subject: Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4)
> In the last episode (Mar 15), David O'Brien said:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:51:55AM -0600, Dan
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N.
Dodd" writes:
: On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Maxim Bolotin wrote:
: > I sent my changes to Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12 Mar 2000, but
: > still have no answer, unfortunately I have no commit privs, so
: > somebody have to commit it for us. I thought that Mi
Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Munehiro Matsuda) wrote:
>
> > No, I don't have real ESS docs.
>
> Thanks, anyway.
>
> > I have 1)the usual DSMaestro2E 3-02-98.pdf datasheet, 2)some small stuff
> > I grabbed off ftp.esstech.com.tw (nolonger exists on the site?) and
I have ju
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Maxim Bolotin wrote:
> I sent my changes to Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12 Mar 2000, but
> still have no answer, unfortunately I have no commit privs, so
> somebody have to commit it for us. I thought that Mike have to,
> just because he commit our previous version of drive
< Here's what's supported:
> fpa(4), fea(4) - Device Drivers for DEC FDDI Controllers
> fpa is a PCI card, fea is EISA.
Note that finding any FDDI hardware these days is getting to be quite
expensive. The manufacturers of FDDI silicon announced late last year
that they were no longer accepting
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> Planning a router between FDDI and Fast Ethernet I'm wondering if I'm
> on the safe side when using FreeBSD 4.0-current for this project
> rather than being more conservative and use an older version of the
> OS.
fpa0: port 0xe400-0xe47f mem
0xfa
If memory serves me right, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> Planning a router between FDDI and Fast Ethernet I'm wondering
> if I'm on the safe side when using FreeBSD 4.0-current for this project
> rather than being more conservative and use an older version of the OS.
You mean 4.0-stable, right? :
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>1/ I think the removal of IPSEC from LINT is by mistake in this patch
yes, that is a mistake.
>2/ The change of separating buffer management from IO management
>is long overdue and the introduction of b_iocmd is a good first step
>for thi
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/b_iocmd.patch
I concur that these patches represent effectlively a mechanical
edit of the sources to produce effectively the same functionality
as before.
I have a couple of points which I would like to discuss.
These are not comp
I've been using the dc driver without a hitch
but when I updated to current two days ago dc stopped
working. Symptoms are no link light on the hub and
ifconfig reports . Lights are on on the
NIC though. Enumerating the varieties of media/mediaopt
has no effect. Fortunately, there is the de dr
>> Original Message <<
On 3/16/00, 2:52:36 AM, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instructions:
> Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton writes:
> > : You can find ins
Howard Leadmon writes:
>
> Has anyone updated a mid-febuary 4.0 to the RELEASE code on Alpha via CVS
> and had it go smooth, and if so what steps did you use to get there??
Yes, at least 3. But my methods are rather unconventional. On my
build machine, which is running a 4.0-current box fr
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What??? 'pentiumpro' code isn't going to be very optimized for a Pentium
> (if it even runs at all).
According to the gcc(1) man page, -mpentiumpro is synonymous to
-mcpu=pentiumpro, which only affects instruction scheduling but
not the actual instruct
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... If I have a PII (Actually celeron 300A) or a PIII, which is
> better, 'pentium' or 'pentiumpro'? I would think the latter, but I've
I have to admit that I kind of lost track of Intel's Pentium du
jour offerings after the PPro, but I think PII
I sent my changes to Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12 Mar 2000, but
still have no answer, unfortunately I have no commit privs, so
somebody have to commit it for us. I thought that Mike have to,
just because he commit our previous version of driver. If you can commit
it I'll have no objection.
W
I notice someone posted this the other day Never have not seen a =
response...so...this is 5.0 CURRENT make world from cvsup March 15.
Hi,
Please check your version of /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/biosdisk.c.
This was fixed yesterday.
welpje:[sys/boot/i386/libi386] % grep '$FreeBS
I notice someone posted this the other day
Never have not seen a response...so...this is 5.0 CURRENT make world from cvsup
March 15.
ys/boot/i386/libi386/biosdisk.c -o
biosdisk.o/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/biosdisk.c: In function
`bd_print':/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/biosdisk.c
> > >> Any ideas how to fix this, or to get to 4.0 RELEASE on my other alphas do
> > >> I have to do a clean reload??
> > >>
> > >> ../../sys/ucontext.h:34: invalid #-line
> > >> ../../alpha/alpha/genassym.c:44: #-lines for entering and leaving files don't
>match
> > >
> > >Can I see the conte
>
> I think that 'pentium' would result in code that isn't as optimized as
> 'pentiumpro', but I've heard that 'pentium' has a lot less problems.
What??? 'pentiumpro' code isn't going to be very optimized for a Pentium
(if it even runs at all).
> I've heard that -mpentiumpro can be pretty bugg
Planning a router between FDDI and Fast Ethernet I'm wondering
if I'm on the safe side when using FreeBSD 4.0-current for this project
rather than being more conservative and use an older version of the OS.
What FDDI cards could be recommended? (There aren't many, though, I believe).
--
Chris
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> >On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> >
> >> Any ideas how to fix this, or to get to 4.0 RELEASE on my other alphas do
> >> I have to do a clean reload??
> >>
> >> ../../sys/ucontext.h:34: invalid #-line
> >> ../../alpha/alpha/genassym.c:44:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith wrote:
> > fxp0: The Intel driver is by far the highest preformance model,
> > beats the 3com (second best) hands down with much lower CPU
> > overhead.
>
> Do you actually have any numbers to quantify this? There's nothing in
> the driver architecture nor
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:11:48PM -0800, Darryl Okahata wrote:
> While you are right about the download/gunzip times, compression
> doesn't help that much. As has been mentioned in -hackers, the ISO
> images only compress by 3% or so, or around ~20MB. So, instead of a
> 640MB ISO image, yo
57 matches
Mail list logo
