David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What??? 'pentiumpro' code isn't going to be very optimized for a Pentium > (if it even runs at all). According to the gcc(1) man page, -mpentiumpro is synonymous to -mcpu=pentiumpro, which only affects instruction scheduling but not the actual instruction set used (for that, use -march=...). So it certainly should run. If you are aware that the man page is wrong in this respect, please tell us! -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Dan Nelson
- Re[2]: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELE... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Sascha Schumann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... R Joseph Wright
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas Köllmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas Köllmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Donn Miller