Re: [Patch, Fortran, Update 2] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

2021-04-26 Thread Andre Vehreschild via Fortran
Hi Steve, hi all, I agree. The cas-things have been removed (I will put the patch for them into the pr98301 ticket, so safe them), streamlining the patch a bit more. Bootstraped and regtested ok on x86_64-linux/f33. Ok for trunk? Regards, Andre Steve Kargl PR fortran/98301 - random_

[Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/92621 Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

2021-04-26 Thread José Rui Faustino de Sousa via Fortran
Hi all! Proposed patch to: PR92621 - Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c) Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. The code currently generated tries to deallocate the undefined artificial cfi.n pointer before it is associated with the allocatable

[wwwdocs, patch] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP (depobj/mutexinoutset for depend), OpenACC (-Wopenacc-parallelism)

2021-04-26 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, this patch documents a new OpenMP feature (many more to be added) in GCC 12. And it documents a new flag for OpenACC. Comments? Wording suggestions? I think for OpenMP, the sentence will be modified several times before the release :-) Tobias - Mentor Graphics (Deutschl

Re: [wwwdocs, patch] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP (depobj/mutexinoutset for depend), OpenACC (-Wopenacc-parallelism)

2021-04-26 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Comments? Wording suggestions? I think for OpenMP, the sentence will be > modified several times before the release :-) Can I take this as a promise? :-) + + For Fortran, OpenMP 5.0 support has been extended for following features + which were be

Re: [PATCH] openacc: Warnings for strange partitioning choices for parallel regions

2021-04-26 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2021-04-26T14:32:10+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > first, can you add an entry regarding this flag > to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html ? Is that a standard thing that all new command-line flags do get highlighted there? (I wouldn't have considered that one important enough?) > S

Re: [PATCH] openacc: Warnings for strange partitioning choices for parallel regions

2021-04-26 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 26.04.21 21:54, Thomas Schwinge wrote: On 2021-04-26T14:32:10+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: first, can you add an entry regarding this flag to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html ? Is that a standard thing that all new command-line flags do get highlighted there? (I wouldn't have consider

[Patch, committed] OpenACC: Fix pattern in dg-bogus in Fortran testcases again (Re: [PATCH] openacc: Warnings for strange partitioning choices for parallel regions)

2021-04-26 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, as discussed below/in this thread, the reset of the diagnostic contest affects the output with ENABLE_OFFLOAD. The attached patch now uses [Ww]arning in dg-bogus. It might be possible to reduce the differences between ENABLE_OFFLOAD being true or false, but it does not seem to be simple