Many thanks for the comprehensive reply, Thiago.
As it happens, running valgrind with -s on both new testcases, indicates
problems emanating from one line in the other test,
class_transformational_1.f90. I am investigating and will put it right.
Regards
Paul
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 04:13, Thiago
Hello Paul,
Paul Richard Thomas writes:
> Thank you very much for your debugging efforts. You really pulled out the
> stops.
You're welcome. In the future if there are other issues or questions
regarding our CI, please feel free to contact us.
> Can I take it then that you will update the too
Hi Thiago,
Thank you very much for your debugging efforts. You really pulled out the
stops.
Can I take it then that you will update the toolchain system wide so that I
can commit the patch without triggering you every night? It would be a pity
to XFAIL it after your efforts.
I thought that since
10:37 +0100
> Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > I have to hold back on the commit until the business below is sorted out.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -----
> > From:
mit until the business below is sorted out.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Paul Richard Thomas
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 08:48
> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm
> To:
>
>
>
Hi Andre,
I have to hold back on the commit until the business below is sorted out.
Cheers
Paul
-- Forwarded message -
From: Paul Richard Thomas
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 08:48
Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm
To:
Hi there,
You
