Hi Thiago, Thank you very much for your debugging efforts. You really pulled out the stops.
Can I take it then that you will update the toolchain system wide so that I can commit the patch without triggering you every night? It would be a pity to XFAIL it after your efforts. I thought that since the failure occurred at -O1 only, it must have been one of those sporadic, random failures that, as far as I can tell, are due to the system deciding that it has something more important to do than run the testsuite Best regards Paul On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 at 06:55, Thiago Jung Bauermann < thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hello, > > One more detail: > > Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> writes: > > > I can see the problem reliably when running the testcase binary for -O1 > > on an armv8l-linux-gnueabihf machine. > > I ran your patch through a different CI loop that we have, where instead > of using the distro's toolchain (binutils, gcc, glibc) to build and test > the patch, it builds every component from scratch and from their > respective tips of trunk. > > This time it didn't detect any problem. All > gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 tests passed: > > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-precommit/2/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/gfortran.sum.xz > > I think this means that with Ubuntu 22.04 glibc we see the problem, but > when using the latest upstream glibc we don't. > > -- > Thiago >
